High Court of Allahabad

44 judgments

Year:

Ajay Kumar Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh

01 Aug 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vivek Narathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Government Order on reservation for persons with disabilities, clarifying that identification of posts for reservation is a continuing State responsibility and reservation applies collectively across disability categories at the establishment level.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reservation persons with disabilities locomotor disability Government Order 7.5.1999

The State of Bihar v. Mahendra Singh

25 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vivek Narathi

The Supreme Court held that using different languages in the application form and OMR answer sheet violates recruitment rules and justifies rejection of candidature, but in this case, the rejection was set aside as unjustified.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment examination application form language OMR answer sheet language instructions

Bharat Rail & Ors. v. Mahendra Singh

25 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vivek Narathi

The court held that a candidate's inadvertent use of different languages in the application form and OMR sheet does not justify rejection of candidature if it does not affect authenticity, allowing the appeal and restoring candidature.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment examination language instructions application form OMR sheet

Ayodhya Faizabad Vikas Prati Karan v. Ram Nawaz

20 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagaratna

The Supreme Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act are not barred if possession was taken before its commencement and compensation was deposited, even if not paid to landowners.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Compensation payment

Seela Vinay Bank v. Collector

10 May 2022 · D. Y. Chandrachud; A. A. Bopanna; Bela M. Vitrevedi

The court upheld the Sub-Registrar's refusal to register a disputed sale deed on grounds of fraud and procedural non-compliance, dismissing the appeal and affirming the limited scope of registration authorities under the Registration Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Registration Act, 1908 Registration Rules, 2003 Section 35(3)(a) Section 72 appeal

Samapan Varishth Jan Parishad v. Rajendra Prasad Agrawal & Ors.

06 May 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramaniam

The Supreme Court held that residents of a nursing home under a license have no legal estate and cannot resist eviction after license termination, setting aside the interim injunction protecting them.

civil appeal_allowed Significant licensee rights nursing home occupancy license vs lease eviction of licensee

Reddy Veerana v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

05 May 2022 · Vini Rana; J. K. Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The court upheld the acquisition and compensation awarded for commercial land in NOIDA, affirming market value-based compensation with justified deductions and recognizing the appellant's ownership rights over unacquired land portions.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition compensation market value development charges

Reddy Veerana v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

05 May 2022 · Vini Rana; J. K. Maheshwari

The court upheld the validity of land acquisition and compensation based on market value with reasonable development charge deductions, affirming prior binding precedents and dismissing challenges to acquisition notifications.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition compensation market value development charges

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited v. U.P. State & Ors.

22 Feb 2022 · M. R., B. V. Nagaratna

A financier who takes possession of a vehicle under hire-purchase or hypothecation agreement is liable to pay motor vehicle tax from the date of possession under the Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1997, irrespective of vehicle use.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant motor vehicle tax financier liability hire-purchase agreement possession of vehicle

U.P. State v. M/s McDowell and Company Limited

05 Jan 2022 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Vidnesh Maheshwari; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that excise duty is not payable on liquor destroyed by fire caused by natural calamity without licensee negligence, upholding the High Court's quashing of the excise department's recovery demand.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant excise duty fire damage natural calamity licensee liability

Uttar Pradesh State v. Principal Abhay Nandan Inter College

27 Dec 2021 · Sanjay Vikash Kaul; M. M. Sundresh
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the State's power to amend service regulations introducing outsourcing in aided educational institutions, rejecting the High Court's declaration of unconstitutionality and affirming the validity of the outsourcing policy under Articles 14 and 30(1).

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Intermediate Education Act, 1921 Regulation 101 Outsourcing policy Article 14

Satya Prakash Diwedi v. Munna alias Chandra Bhan

17 Dec 2021 · N. V. Chandrachud; B. V. Nagaratna

The Supreme Court held that a claimant's appeal for enhancement of compensation cannot be used by the High Court to reduce the award without any cross-appeal by the insurance company and restored the original compensation amount.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Compensation Permanent Disability Order 41 Rule 33 CPC

Uttar Pradesh State v. Vivek Kumar Singh & Ors.

11 Dec 2021 · M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that mandatory service eligibility criteria for promotion cannot be bypassed by discretionary exemption under relaxation rules, setting aside the High Court's order granting such exemption.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant promotion eligibility service rules relaxation rules discretionary exemption

Rajesh Kumar Singh v. Rajiv Nain Upadhyay

08 Dec 2021 · D. Y. Chandrachud; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that seniority lists must be prepared in accordance with statutory rules and merit, setting aside inconsistent lists and allowing the appeal for fresh seniority preparation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Seniority list Promotion Uttar Pradesh Service Seniority Rules, 1991 Uttar Pradesh Minor Irrigation Department Engineering Service Rules, 2009

Wahab Uddin v. Meenakshi Gahlot

13 Nov 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the termination of appellants' temporary appointments for Hindi stenographer posts due to failure in requisite tests and non-compliance with selection rules, dismissing their appeal for regularization.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant temporary appointment Municipal Employees Establishment Rules 1947 selection list validity typing test

Sughar Singh v. Harir Singh & Ors.

26 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; Avinrudh Bose

The Supreme Court upheld the plaintiff's suit for specific performance, clarifying that readiness and willingness must be proved substantively and that procedural non-compliance should not defeat equitable relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness Uttar Pradesh Special Courts Act, 1963 section 16(c)

Uttar Pradesh Jal Apurti Evam Sewerage Nigam v. Pradip Kan

22 Oct 2021 · Dr. Sanjay Yadav; Vigyan Narthi; B. V. Nagaratna · 2021 INSC 659
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of water and sewerage taxes under the Uttar Pradesh Jal Aapurti Evam Sewage Ati Niyam as a constitutionally competent property tax, setting aside the High Court's order for refund.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Uttar Pradesh Jal Aapurti Evam Sewage Ati Niyam water tax sewerage tax Article 265

Uttar Pradesh Jal Apurti Evam Sewerage Nigam v. Pradip Kan

22 Oct 2021 · Dr. Sanjay Yadav; Vigyan Narthi; B. V. Nagaratna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of water and sewerage taxes imposed under the UP Jal Supply and Sewerage Regulation Act, holding them to be constitutionally valid property taxes within the State Legislature's competence.

tax appeal_allowed Significant water tax sewerage tax Uttar Pradesh Jal Supply and Sewerage Regulation Act, 1975 property tax

Neelima Srivastava v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

17 Aug 2021 · S. Abdul Nazir; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that an employee appointed during leave and continuing service only by interim orders is not entitled to regularization unless statutory conditions are met, and restored the appellant's right to regularization under the 2001 Rules.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization unauthorized appointment interim order service rules

Saurav Jain v. ABP Jain

05 Aug 2021 · D. Y. Chandrachud; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of MDA's auction and possession under ULCRA, dismissed the first respondent's ownership claim based on a void sale deed, and affirmed the civil court's jurisdiction to try the suit.

property appeal_allowed Significant ULCRA urban land ceiling possession auction validity