Supreme Court of India

31,998 judgments

Year:

Afroz Jahan v. State of Bihar

· Tarun Chatterjee; Harjit Singh Bedi

The Supreme Court allowed a transfer petition and quashed multiple criminal cases between parties upon their amicable settlement under Article 142 of the Constitution.

criminal petition_allowed Transfer Petition Article 142 Constitution of India Compromise in criminal cases Quashing of criminal proceedings

Charu Chetal nee Girotra v. Prashant Chetal

· K.G. Balakrishnan; P. Sathasivam

The Supreme Court disposed of a transfer petition in a matrimonial dispute after the parties settled and agreed to withdraw all pending litigations.

family other matrimonial dispute mediation settlement transfer petition

Kusum v. Pritpal Singh

· K. G. Balakrishnan; P. Sathasivam

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a matrimonial case from Delhi to Chandigarh on grounds of the petitioner's residence and financial hardship.

civil appeal_allowed transfer petition matrimonial case jurisdiction financial hardship

State of Punjab v. Kulwant Singh @ Kanta

· Dr. Arijit Pasayat; P. Sathasivam

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a triple murder case, emphasizing the appellate court's power to review acquittals and the necessity of substantial and compelling reasons to overturn them.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 302 IPC delay in FIR eyewitness credibility

Suraj Singh v. State of U.P.

· Dr. Arijit Pasayat

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction reversing the trial court's acquittal, affirming the broad powers of appellate courts to review acquittals under Section 378 CrPC while emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for substantial reasons to disturb acquittals.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 378 CrPC presumption of innocence ocular evidence

State of West Bengal v. Brahmo Samaj Education Society

· K.G. Balakrishnan; P. Sathasivam; J.M. Panchal · (2004) 6 SCC 224

The Supreme Court allowed the State's review petition, set aside earlier observations on aided institutions' right to appoint teachers, and directed a Constitution Bench to reconsider the constitutional validity of appointment procedures under the West Bengal College Service Commission Act.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant appointment of teachers aided educational institutions Articles 19(1)(g) and 19(1)(6) West Bengal College Service Commission Act

Nikhil Merchant v. Central Bureau of Investigation

· Altamas Kabir; Markandey Katju
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant following a civil compromise withdrawing all claims, holding that inherent powers permit quashing even in cases involving non-compoundable offences to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant compromise quashing criminal proceedings compoundable offences non-compoundable offences

M/S. Indtel Technical Services Pvt.Ltd. v. W.S. Atkins Rail Ltd.

· Altamas Kabir

The Supreme Court held that Indian courts have jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 in international commercial arbitrations governed by foreign law unless expressly excluded by parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 International Commercial Arbitration Jurisdiction of Indian Courts Seat of Arbitration

T.N. Godavaraman Thirumulpad v. Union of India & others

· K.G. Balakrishnan

The Supreme Court approved forest land diversion for bauxite mining under a Rehabilitation Package balancing tribal welfare and environmental protection, while rejecting lease assignment to the SPV and deferring price fixation changes.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Special Purpose Vehicle forest diversion bauxite mining Niyamgiri Hills

State of West Bengal v. Shyamadas Banerjee & Another

· Altamas Kabir; Markandey Katju

The Supreme Court held that a Special Court under the West Bengal Special Courts Act, 1949, lacks jurisdiction to try offences against a person who ceased to be a public servant before cognizance was taken, thereby quashing the proceedings against a former M.L.A.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Special Courts Act, 1949 public servant Member of Legislative Assembly cognizance

Union of India v. Ranu Bhandari

· Altamas Kabir; Markandey Katju

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of a preventive detention order for non-supply of vital documents to the detenu, affirming the right to effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant preventive detention COFEPOSA Act Article 22(5) Constitution non-supply of documents

Union of India v. M/s Dharamendra Textile Processors

· Dr. Arijit Pasayat
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act is mandatory without requiring mens rea or discretion to reduce the penalty, overruling contrary precedent.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 11AC Central Excise Act mandatory penalty mens rea strict liability

S. Abdul Khader v. Abdul Wajid & Ors

· Altamas Kabir; Markandey Katju

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a suit for specific performance where the seller lacked authority and the property was validly sold to a bona fide purchaser without notice.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement for sale bona fide purchaser Section 52 Transfer of Property Act

State of U.P. v. Chandrapal & Anr.

· Dr. Arijit Pasayat; C.K. Thakker; Lokeshwar Singh Panta

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to discrepancies in prosecution evidence and doubts about the authenticity of the FIR and medical reports.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony medical evidence

Arumugam v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu

· Dr. Arijit Pasayat

The Supreme Court modified the murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, holding that witness relationship does not discredit testimony and that the killing occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation but with undue advantage taken.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Section 302 IPC Exception 4 Section 300 IPC interested witness sudden fight

Vaniyankandy Bhaskaran v. Mooliyil Padinhjarekandy Sheela

· Altamas Kabir; Markandey Katju

The Supreme Court held that Rule 104 of Order 21 CPC applies only if a suit affecting title is pending at the start of execution proceedings, dismissing the appellant's attempt to stall eviction by filing a later suit.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 21 Rule 104 CPC execution proceedings title dispute injunction

Rukmini Narvekar v. Vijaya Satardekar

· Markandey Katju; Altamas Kabir

The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings against Ranjit Satardekar could not be quashed based on civil suit evidence and clarified that at the charge framing stage only prosecution material is considered, while quashing proceedings against Vijaya Satardekar for lack of prima facie evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 227 CrPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings framing of charge

N. Naveen Kumar and Ors. v. State of A.P.

· Dr. Arijit Pasayat

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to allow deposit of money in lieu of confiscated assets after dismissal of the criminal appeal, emphasizing that the court cannot review its judgment under Section 482 Cr.P.C. once functus officio.

criminal appeal_dismissed Prevention of Corruption Act Section 482 CrPC inherent powers confiscation of property

State of Haryana v. Sher Singh

· Dr. Arijit Pasayat

The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the accused due to insufficient evidence linking him to rash and negligent driving causing death.

criminal appeal_dismissed rash and negligent driving dying declaration identity of accused eyewitness testimony

Standard Corrosion Controls Pvt. Ltd. v. Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD

· Markandey Katju

The Supreme Court held that a party cannot bypass the agreed ICC arbitration procedure and directly approach the Court under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act for appointment of an arbitrator.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) ICC Arbitration Rules Appointment of arbitrator