Delhi High Court
139,246 judgments
Mr. M.N. Singh, Advocate. v. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.II & ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court held that dismissal after settlement of an industrial dispute does not contravene Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, and thus a complaint under Section 33A is not maintainable.
Mr. A.P. Dhamija, Advocate. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....
The Delhi High Court held that public sector employees governed by the Payment of Gratuity Act are not entitled to retrospective enhancement of gratuity prior to the statutory amendment date, and differential cut-off dates do not violate Article 14.
of petitioner. v. DELHI ADMINISTRATION & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court modified a Labour Court award directing reinstatement of terminated casual workers to a lump sum compensation settlement, clarifying entitlement under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act and correcting clerical errors in the award.
Mrs. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate. v. SHRI RAM KANWAR & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court held that the Disabilities Act applies to pending cases, reinstated a prematurely retired disabled employee with full back wages, and rejected the employer's plea of refusal of alternative employment.
Mr. Pravir K. Jain with Mr. M.A. Khan, Advocate v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....
The Delhi High Court set aside the permanent deregistration of a pharmaceutical supplier for lack of prior show cause notice, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of natural justice in administrative debarment proceedings.
Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Advocate v. SHRI TRIBHUVAN YADAV .....
The Delhi High Court set aside an inconsistent Industrial Tribunal award and modified it to grant enhanced retrenchment compensation to a casual worker, emphasizing the binding nature of settlements and the illegality of regularizing casual employment contrary to rules.
Mr. K.B. Thakur for Mr Siddharth Yadav, Advocate. v. SAFDARJUNG HOSPITAL & ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking appointment as Nursing Attendants, holding that absence of advertisement invalidated the selection process and no indefeasible right to appointment arose.
Mr. K.B. Thakur for Mr Siddharth Yadav, Advocate. v. SAFDARJUNG HOSPITAL & ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking appointment as Nursing Attendants, holding that absence of advertisement invalidated the selection process and no indefeasible right to appointment arose from mere selection.
Delhi Police & Anr. . Petitioner Through Ms. Sonia Sharma, Advocate v. Omveer Yadav .
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order quashing cancellation of a police constable candidate's candidature who was falsely implicated and discharged in a criminal case, emphasizing fair consideration of facts before denying public employment.
Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate v. DELHI ADMNINISTRATION & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld an Industrial Tribunal award granting retrospective promotion and pay parity to Grade 'B' Staff Nurses and Auxiliary Nurses/Midwives who performed duties of Grade 'A' Staff Nurses, emphasizing the principle of equal pay for equal work and refusing to interfere under Article 226 to prevent injustice.
Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate v. DELHI ADMNINISTRATION & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award granting promotion and equal pay to Grade 'B' Staff Nurses and Auxiliary Nurses/Midwives who worked as Grade 'A' Staff Nurses for three years or more, rejecting MCD's challenge based on qualification and recruitment rules.
Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate v. DELHI ADMNINISTRATION & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal award granting retrospective promotion and equal pay to Grade B Nurses performing Grade A duties, rejecting MCD's challenge based on qualifications and recruitment rules.
Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate v. DELHI ADMNINISTRATION & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award granting retrospective promotion and pay parity to Grade 'B' Staff Nurses and Auxiliary Nurses/Midwives who performed duties of Grade 'A' Staff Nurses, emphasizing the principle of equal pay for equal work and refusing to interfere with factual findings despite formal qualification requirements.
Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate v. DELHI ADMNINISTRATION & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld an Industrial Tribunal award granting retrospective promotion and pay equalization to Grade 'B' Staff Nurses and Auxiliary Nurses/Midwives who worked as Grade 'A' Staff Nurses, emphasizing practical experience over formal qualifications and refusing to set aside the award after long delay.