Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK..... v. PRIME ENGINEERS CONSULTANTS.....

· HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.... · 2018:DHC:4813-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that disputes expressly excluded from arbitration by contract are non-arbitrable and set aside arbitral awards that disregarded explicit contractual clauses on delay, interest, and price variation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 excepted matters arbitrability price variation clause

Neety Gupta v. Usha Gupta & Ors

· Sanjiv Khanna; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2018:DHC:6971-DB

The Delhi High Court held that in partition suits, mesne profits can be claimed after a preliminary decree even if not prayed for in the plaint, and directed an inquiry into mesne profits payable to the appellant occupying less than her share.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mesne profits partition suit Order XX Rule 18 CPC preliminary decree

Rakesh Oberoi v. Pawan Kumar Saraswat

· 2019:DHC:7988

The High Court of Delhi heard multiple consolidated civil petitions filed by various petitioners against Pawan Kumar Saraswat and others in 2019.

civil other petition High Court of Delhi civil dispute consolidation

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. v. India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd.

· Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2020:DHC:1854-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal between ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. and Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. via video conferencing during the COVID-19 lockdown, with no detailed reasons provided in the excerpt.

other other appeal ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. Securities and Exchange

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. v. India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd.

· Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2020:DHC:1855-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of ICICI Lombard, setting aside an interim order under SEBI Act and granting procedural relaxations due to COVID-19, emphasizing balanced judicial scrutiny of regulatory actions during the pandemic.

civil appeal_allowed Significant COVID-19 lockdown procedural relaxation court fees exemption notarization exemption

IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. v. India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd. & Ors.

· Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2020:DHC:1853-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal by IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. against Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd., disposing it in terms of an earlier judgment to prevent re-litigation of settled issues.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant appeal disposal res judicata trusteeship services housing finance

Swararaj @ Raj Shrikant Thakeray & Anr. v. State & Anr.

· Jasmeet Singh · 2023:DHC:2758

The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning orders for lack of mandatory inquiry and prior sanction but refused to quash the criminal complaint alleging provocative speech hurting religious sentiments.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 202 CrPC Section 196 CrPC summoning order prior sanction

Pondicherry Basketball Association v. Union of India & Ors.

· Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:2993
Cites 8 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the flawed BFI election results due to improper rejection of nominations and directed fresh elections under independent supervision to ensure free and fair process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Basketball Federation of India National Sports Federation Model Election Guidelines Sports Code 2011

Pankaj Pandey v. Neeraj Kumar Mishra

· V. Ramasubramaniam; Pankaj Vimattal

The Supreme Court upheld the legality of salary payments to teachers in recognized Sanskrit institutions based on seniority and government approvals, dismissing the review petition challenging the High Court's orders.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant salary payment grant-in-aid seniority assistant teachers

Chanderprabhu Jain College of Higher Education & School of Law v. Directorate of Higher Education & Ors.

22 Apr 2089 · Anu Malhotra · 2019:DHC:3963

The Delhi High Court upheld the State government's refusal to grant NOC for increased intake in a law college due to non-compliance with mandatory space norms despite Bar Council of India's approval, emphasizing the primacy of university and State regulations in affiliation matters.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant No Objection Certificate Bar Council of India Legal Education Rules 2008 Infrastructure norms