High Court of Calcutta
3 judgments
Year:
Sujasha Mukherji v. High Court of Calcutta
The Supreme Court held that improper moderation of examination marks without a Head Examiner and consensus meetings violated established principles, unjustly disqualifying the appellant, and directed her interview to be conducted afresh excluding original examiners.
Vrajesh Agarwal v. Sushma Poddar & Ors.
The court directed restoration of the appeal dismissed for non-deposit of pre-deposit amount due to genuine financial hardship and ordered the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal to decide the appeal on merits.
4877e5f723436fe6d276e28becc92d44daa48d87652b2d97569fc0b5d09a380b
The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Calcutta High Court for redressal.