UNKNOWN COURT
50 judgments
_c:ryry" uppl"iot.i il, A;G;H: A;;"* v. Mr' Shaildendra Bhardwaj, .Adriocate for Gorden Forests India Ltd
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions filed after the Supreme Court's cut-off date, directing that such claims not be entertained by the committee and be treated as claim petitions in accordance with Supreme Court orders.
Deepesh Gupta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Court allowed the petition to quash the FIR and complaint under the Wild Life (Protection) Act and IPC, and issued a corrigendum correcting typographical errors in the earlier judgment.
NTPC LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
The court corrected a typographical error and directed the Trial Court to consider NCLT-granted immunity before deciding whether NTPC Ltd. should be arrayed as an accused, requiring a reasoned order.
Technology Development Board v. M/S ACME METAL POWDER (P) LTD. & ORS
The court transferred the execution petition to the competent court at Pondicherry having territorial jurisdiction over the judgment debtors and the properties involved.
SHAILENDRA SWARUP v. SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside penalty orders under FERA due to non-service of Show Cause Notice on a resigned director, emphasizing strict compliance with procedural fairness and natural justice.
2514959417c7b54772372baec9b3de9f8795032480a7f031b532d3326f55fa92
The court dismissed the company appeal and all pending applications as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties.
NOVEMBER 09, 2OL[2] RN pr -',,r /'r n:\ v.K, sHALr, J.
The court allowed the appellant to withdraw the criminal appeal and dismissed it as withdrawn.
5. In support of the aforesaid submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the decisions in 'The Corporation of Calicut vs. W.P.[C) No.702/2009 Page[2] 6l J K.Sreenivasan', (2002) 5 SCC 361; W.P.(C) No.1093 112009, Shri Tek Chand vs. Estat
The Delhi High Court held that while the appellate forum cannot exercise equity jurisdiction to stay eviction orders under the Public Premises Act, the court may stay eviction pending fair disposal of pending applications when no unauthorized construction exists.
22a878555e340de717016f436f1a7941a0cee438ad504399adb67f37827aebda
The court disposed of the appeal based on a lawful and mutually agreed settlement between the parties, binding them to its terms.
5d922730d232a8d1db91697dde8269e552aad51b7ef20163f370984fd451c772
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw it.
% 30.09.2011 v. Mr.A.K.Gupta and Mr.Dilshad Hussain, Advocate for
Contempt petition dismissed as the respondent agreed to comply with the settlement terms and facilitate repurchase of the disputed shop.
b48e1fb7c5d5fc09134144ccf51224cd176e16e14654ab958dc4771b8333fb62
The court dismissed the appeal as not pressed while preserving the parties' rights to pursue the suit, directing the Trial Court to dispose of the suit after trial in accordance with law.
•j hroLiuh v. None
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to failure to serve the respondent and absence of petitioner’s appearance.
24531864fb3c3c25763b518b2f6fc5164d2e6a5c0cb1459e25b258a2db60c83f
The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request for withdrawal.
7bb775f90bf33bbdf1124968af20d6d5d5ab103d293a4776c48d4cc29c7fa898
The court refused mediation, allowed withdrawal of petitions by the petitioners, dismissed the petitions as withdrawn, and ordered immediate return of trial records to avoid delay.
2bbce6979c1134bba1971a9f462865a52faaa681fe4fca07fed9525b33d01dec
The court dismissed the criminal appeals as withdrawn upon the appellants' counsel's request to withdraw the appeals.
6f747eaad7a9103099441ecf4f431b147471b339bc8495a3143bf6b260253712
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's repeated failure to appear before the court.
3b74cd3875fbbb59f55097904b8a5352046560021804f9143cbf41c0e3225dc3
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-appearance of the petitioner on the second call.
df4f90b6aa203b0645524ff14abcba2bf1c3846ff136ef1cc5d7a0698e5378fc
The court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their criminal petition with liberty to file a fresh one, dismissing the current petition as withdrawn.
3. The aforesaid petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. V.k. SHALI, J. MAY 02, 2011 RN
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw three criminal petitions with liberty to seek remedies before the trial court, dismissing the petitions accordingly.