High Court of Allahabad
69 judgments
Raman Singh v. District Inspector of Schools, Jalaun & Ors.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal directing continuation of the appellant as a temporary appointee with salary until regular appointment, setting aside the High Court's dismissal of his writ petition for regularization.
Lal Bahadur Gaum v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that dismissal of a teacher from a private unaided college affiliated to CCS University without prior approval of the Vice-Chancellor under Section 35(2) of the Act is illegal and directed reinstatement.
a9c32eb2fa4bff68aca26ce51ade93226849a258710428f8395ee1a14a7bc3b5
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal upholding the validity of mutation entries and revenue authorities' orders under the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, confirming the appellant had no proprietary right in the disputed land.
N. K. Janu v. Laxmi Chandra
The Supreme Court held that daily wage workers with intermittent breaks in service are not entitled to regularization under the 2001 Rules but are entitled to minimum wages, and dismissed the contempt petition for alleged non-compliance of court orders.
Barez Khan @ Guddu v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the criminal complaint against appellants under Sections 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act, holding that no prima facie case existed to sustain the proceedings.
5bde1265ed48521384e8e2d1f684bbc1b258575bd0a26fccc44d2510aba8320e
The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings due to improper exercise of discretion by the trial court and directed expeditious trial upon fresh application.
Pramod Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for forgery under Sections 467 and 468 IPC, emphasizing cautious reliance on handwriting expert evidence supported by corroborative proof.
Pramod Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The court upheld the appellant's conviction for forgery under Sections 467 and 468 IPC based on corroborated expert and circumstantial evidence but reduced the sentence considering the case's facts and delay.
Vitrajugi Narayan v. Chandra Narthi Kala & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the disputed property was part of an undivided estate governed by the rule of primogeniture, invalidating the sale deed executed by the heir and restoring possession to the appellants.