High Court of Uttarakhand

2 judgments

Year:

SARAL WIRE CRAFT PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX

20 Jul 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that service of an adjudication order under the Central Excise Act must be effected on the concerned person or authorized agent to trigger limitation for appeal, and invalid service renders the appeal period unstarted, allowing the appeal to be heard on merits.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 37C service of order limitation period

Diwani Ram & Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand

29 Jul 2009 · Harjit Singh Bedi; J. M. Panchal

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of a husband and in-laws for killing Sati Devi based on credible evidence of motive and eyewitness testimony, dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder illicit pregnancy eyewitness testimony Section 302 IPC