Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mr. M.N. Singh, Advocate. v. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.II & ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court held that dismissal after settlement of an industrial dispute does not contravene Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, and thus a complaint under Section 33A is not maintainable.
Mr. A.P. Dhamija, Advocate. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....
The Delhi High Court held that public sector employees governed by the Payment of Gratuity Act are not entitled to retrospective enhancement of gratuity prior to the statutory amendment date, and differential cut-off dates do not violate Article 14.
of petitioner. v. DELHI ADMINISTRATION & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court modified a Labour Court award directing reinstatement of terminated casual workers to a lump sum compensation settlement, clarifying entitlement under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act and correcting clerical errors in the award.
Mrs. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate. v. SHRI RAM KANWAR & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court held that the Disabilities Act applies to pending cases, reinstated a prematurely retired disabled employee with full back wages, and rejected the employer's plea of refusal of alternative employment.
Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Advocate v. SHRI TRIBHUVAN YADAV .....
The Delhi High Court set aside an inconsistent Industrial Tribunal award and modified it to grant enhanced retrenchment compensation to a casual worker, emphasizing the binding nature of settlements and the illegality of regularizing casual employment contrary to rules.