High Court of Mumbai
4 judgments
Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Limited v. Vijay D. Kasbe & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that supervisors required to perform manual labor or operate machinery are entitled to double overtime allowance under the Factories Act, 1948, while those exempted under Maharashtra Rules are not, partially allowing the appeal.
Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Limited v. Vijay D. Kasbe & Ors.
The court held that supervisors not performing manual labor are exempt from double overtime wages under the Factories Act, 1948 as per Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963 Rule 100, allowing the appeal and setting aside conflicting High Court orders.
Central Excise Commissioner, Mumbai v. Morarji Gokuldas SPG and WVG Co. Ltd.
The court held that recovery of wrongly refunded excise duty after setting aside a refund order under Section 35E does not require a separate demand notice under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
edfeadf9b441327bc37703df35f6a5c0d0730755a0230808daa8f2575b06b3b7
The High Court allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the stay order and permitting the petitioners to proceed with their property suits in the Bengaluru courts, clarifying jurisdictional principles under Order VII Rules 10 and 11 CPC.