UNKNOWN COURT
476 judgments
58b7d9801d02e7ceaa69c085c52c5d1172dc7a5bb1f4fdfc9f9ab7717c484b24
The court upheld the enforcement of orders and fines imposed on the petitioner, dismissing objections based on procedural and substantive grounds.
chol3302021 3757c067
The court allowed substituted service by publication in a newspaper after personal service on a legal heir at the last known address was unsuccessful despite due diligence.
3d6c7d909a62c708869649eca045ac8f86ed2356dba7d6c502e9352a0e1eeb38
The court upheld the validity of land acquisition and compensation awarded, emphasizing strict procedural compliance and fair market value compensation under the Land Acquisition Act and constitutional principles.
38c00d390d6288e70757e6d62d2d7adcdb4299dc829030376d58cf457af04a14
The court upheld the validity of tax assessments and penalties under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, dismissing the petitioner's appeal for lack of procedural or substantive infirmities.
1b2c77f0c8b1134af7a343a526e132c0dfae9a8de57a55ade5e5edb7b92d056f
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of COVID-19 lockdown orders and affirmed the conviction of the petitioner for violating such orders under Section 135 of the Tamil Nadu Police Act.
36348bd414dab29011c66656fe5a85998dd130b01127ef56c993d1caa13a8f0b
The court upheld the constitutional validity of COVID-19 lockdown orders under the Epidemic Diseases Act, emphasizing the balance between public health and fundamental rights.
fd2673108ede4fc27b5573a88700784872ba5b6a8193888742c5d5568eb6fca2
The court upheld the conviction for grievous hurt, ruling that evidence was sufficient and procedural delays did not prejudice the petitioner’s right to a fair trial.
a0d112ec248ab13fb2f275fbf4cf7c355ab0030c0156a398f13b0368f280fd87
The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on a complete and consistent chain of circumstantial and forensic evidence, affirming the correct application of legal principles and procedural safeguards.
bb86a53fe1b5b0eaa36dca37bcecfed4c8a2888f50cfe86034dd5af20bcae36b
The court upheld the conviction for grievous hurt, affirming that credible medical and circumstantial evidence proved the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
dee213a48b8ce30e4c2e6701eaf08411772b4e07030100357b2f58d191332c47
The High Court upheld the appellant's conviction, affirming that the prosecution's evidence was sufficient and procedural safeguards were observed.
483346c28c7f05c2a7c892a32cd40723e9fbcfe54635b80de57faa67fbdca828
The High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for a serious offence, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt with credible evidence and proper adherence to procedural safeguards.
ebacf7c5c135fbb314ca19291fa03a62bad6d761fd6e7bf75e6298d62e50535f
The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal, holding that the petitioner failed to prove forgery or fraud in the property transaction, thereby upholding the respondent's title and possession.
5d8cc7d9c8aa450286984bfe2d3b45344b8407a7fdf2adbef0d42a7632c8e601
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction in a sexual assault case, affirming that credible victim testimony corroborated by medical evidence suffices for conviction despite minor inconsistencies.
a4d993cd483fa8d2b8fa3006146cf040a60876d49d08ef83e00f6802646601b5
The court upheld the conviction of the accused for causing grievous injuries, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through medical and circumstantial evidence.
f18cd7429c447c44db41fd9a7324868f8e413cf34a77ab73c34c7c328ac0d1eb
The court held that the Transfer of Property Act, 1973 governs the transfer and recovery of immovable properties, validating the petitioner’s transfer and recovery rights under the Act against the respondents.
13444f6fbcb15e53d6007f9769d85bdb683f2820106f3338a6c0bdf511bbf75d
The court clarified the scope and applicability of the Bengal Immovable Property (Redemption of Possession) Act, 1973, holding that redemption of possession is a statutory remedy available only under defined conditions and partially allowed the petitioner's application accordingly.
2173b993efa9abd1a45220917765ddbb498a86f9027af0ec8e92235bb4467db4
The Supreme Court upheld the petitioner's ownership and possession rights over disputed land, dismissing the respondents' appeal and affirming eviction of unlawful encroachers.
65f53d114e8c356d2e836e54914ff26dddb2217718c969159250478b92e53165
The court held that compensation for property damage must be just and based on fair market value, allowing partial enhancement of awards where valuations were inadequate.
8b4565f9c4fed526c56be321ab237e6b827a24e663ccff1f56ceab0e9a6bc145
The court upheld the conviction and sentence of the accused, holding that credible eyewitness and forensic evidence proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and procedural safeguards were complied with.
e5c0ea32df8677ead1e36b8f95bcf31dedbb815b615898948506153bee1393cb
The court upheld the conviction and sentence of the accused, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through credible evidence including forensic reports.