UNKNOWN COURT
476 judgments
2ec38ae099f04a1a1159e501d5b045768ded5d4618bde47c3b1dcf14bb887de0
The High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea to quash the FIR and criminal proceedings, affirming that quashing powers under Section 482 CrPC are to be exercised sparingly and only when no prima facie offence is made out.
355877fd3fcad4b7ec6d736ea22a6ea7388ddfb55e1786b6124757acfda17c4a
The court upheld the legality of administrative actions against the petitioner, emphasizing compliance with natural justice and statutory provisions, and dismissed the petition seeking relief.
61374a83c391f6efef45efe8bf016dd2a7f308789e57725d10ee3f41c811e0e6
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the accused, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt with due adherence to procedural safeguards.
05cbcd1f67e606b84049ae24c364079ea2bcf3fef63d99ee326b38f47c6506e6
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on complete circumstantial and forensic evidence, affirming the prosecution's burden to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and dismissing the accused's appeal.
29da0ea742fd83b47526a28bab2a13058878c215a775191b5959aaf92612efa0
The court upheld the respondent’s statutory possession rights under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1949, dismissing the petitioner’s claim of wrongful dispossession.
f66900305b9f0ec710a3c9390e53d18c194ad8cece7b2325ec513923209d0c49
The court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder and conspiracy under Sections 302 and 120B IPC, affirming that consistent eyewitness and medical evidence sufficiently proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
8c8e19ae55669384cf6191315badbcbe7e691494385f24c5a9af78db49f91574
The court upheld the conviction and sentence of the petitioner, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt under the Indian Penal Code.
1873c4067b1125e825e0b552587b4eb77dc0decb1c9019aceda2858bc31bfe09
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of accused No.1 for murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through consistent eyewitness and medical evidence.
161649a719ba5e7ce4e6ed95520166da187e57c6533bffe900a3b0b9aa1383a4
The court upheld the conviction of accused persons for murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC based on conclusive circumstantial and eyewitness evidence establishing common intention.
ce1de9d11e044c68f467d457bdf3a6193bba3b3fe2dc2a87fe958c7caa5e5ba9
The court clarified that appointment of a receiver under Section 92 CPC in public trust disputes is discretionary and must be exercised cautiously, dismissing the petition for lack of sufficient grounds.
d94577a590574c0530b7d7428ab290a58c0d2f3765164141926377b5842a4269
The court upheld the conviction in a criminal fraud case, emphasizing strict procedural compliance and sufficiency of prosecution evidence.
4dc91e2495c5e8d78fa049e70ddbfcd79c76c507e91817c8b095645efaafc6fd
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on voluntary confessional statements corroborated by evidence, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the trial and appellate courts' findings.
9e9371ced79d7a78229e813dadfd936d7b48382b3ab9b46f56e22404fa23abab
The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction, holding that the prosecution proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt and the trial was conducted fairly.
60edb68b2c518b99c197cfe45decc354784f58171b9d6b2b8da51ae248291c45
The court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC, affirming that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt the accused's intention and act of murder based on consistent eyewitness and medical evidence.
83aa8e99adc89b540de15a0b47cc7b5a870073ae70ef965f0323b4d4a3d71197
The court upheld the murder conviction of the accused, holding that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through credible evidence and proper procedure.
0735ebf724a2f9c16241bdde7cbd12528889b9ae3ec7d2ca70911a93bbab48f5
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for causing hurt and criminal intimidation under Sections 294, 506(2), and 319 IPC, dismissing the appeal for lack of merit.
8f6a09139e373df21f466eb66f696866321c4807a7198608d3729f0a2bbb38fd
The High Court upheld the conviction under IPC Sections 294(gp), 506, and 319, affirming that credible medical and witness evidence sufficed to prove the petitioner’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
9c9e0748ef85613cf5488fa2dcde3782c6b6e60d4771ef385b993890f1ae62d5
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction and sentence for murder and related offences, affirming the sufficiency of medical and eyewitness evidence and proper application of law.
9a0ab4005c23cdd037a7be450aac7eaed437cda88f9e75eae3f72449c99d2afc
The High Court upheld the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that credible and corroborated evidence proved the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
caaa4ebe22c22cf77b00a14e44220f11426df23c5dcafc34c24a4f620fd9d643
The court upheld the conviction under Sections 825 and 826 IPC, affirming the trial court's proper application of law and procedural fairness, and dismissed the appeal.