UNKNOWN COURT

476 judgments

Year:

29492eefddc130ab57bb17a1bc6b85db18863227df1e8cd970282b8b53412967

17 Oct 2019 · Sanjay T. Shon Kue; K. M. Kajobse

The court clarified that under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, transfer of surplus land requires strict compliance with premium payment and deposit conditions under sections 8 and 9, and failure to do so invalidates the transfer.

property appeal_allowed Significant Bihar Land Reforms Act surplus land land ceiling premium payment

e915e8d629cfea9ed5be1e03089179cdbc3ba6dadd02b3598f39087ed85d2326

10 Oct 2019 · 2019 INSC 667
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the liability of the petitioner under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, dismissing the appeal and affirming the correctness of the High Court's judgment on procedural and substantive grounds.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 negligence liability procedural compliance

111a3ff4ffc64365439beba58b87ce8a81bb1a3d9c8009fafe64de0208324187

03 Oct 2019

The appellate court upheld the trial court’s conviction and sentence, affirming that the prosecution proved the petitioner’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt and that the charges were properly framed under Section 227 CrPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 227 CrPC prima facie case conviction appellate interference

56818d315f3b086ed880caf7d68e844b55f61d564eb840590fffa618adee3b00

03 Oct 2019 · 2019 INSC 1119
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for forgery and cheating under Sections 420, 467, 471, and 477 IPC, affirming the sufficiency of evidence and correct application of legal principles.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant forgery cheating Indian Penal Code Section 420 IPC

e33483751e9a98f11a24739644e918768e2ef57116e14fb10e152d9b246c5538

03 Oct 2019

The court upheld the conviction for forgery and cheating under IPC Sections 420, 467, 471, and 477, affirming that the prosecution proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt with sufficient documentary and oral evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant forgery cheating Indian Penal Code Section 420

8a76657201cc28e742beaa05c0ef2dc062cce7283243e3c6c62012489f6f3590

27 Sep 2019
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The court upheld the legality of the police investigation and prosecution against the petitioner, dismissing challenges based on alleged procedural irregularities and abuse of process.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant police investigation procedural safeguards Code of Criminal Procedure Indian Penal Code

1aa531097476a3b72c795880aac18683a3856678695475fa63e0b42f49683566

23 Sep 2019
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The court upheld the conviction of the petitioner for causing grievous hurt, affirming that corroborated medical and eyewitness evidence sufficed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant grievous hurt proof beyond reasonable doubt medical evidence eyewitness testimony

4922339604578641126ecfd382c39d764e5c606524007ba639ff3c9fb5d6348f

17 Sep 2019 · 2019 INSC 1044

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, affirming that consistent and corroborated evidence beyond reasonable doubt justifies conviction despite minor contradictions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder circumstantial evidence medical evidence

742091a1615fabc418f421e88c724dce7e8d4c07208fd4c46419fd315701b4c4

17 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, affirming that credible eyewitness and medical evidence proved the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder proof beyond reasonable doubt eyewitness testimony

8adbad0e0743733995787d11fa7a873fe5e5400031ebfa9048711f82073ea3f0

13 Sep 2019 · 2019 INSC 1028
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The court upheld the validity of the FIR and investigation, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge and emphasizing limited judicial interference in ongoing criminal proceedings.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant FIR validity judicial interference police investigation quashing of FIR

0547cb1b5ad0554b34ef01e96541b8740e0e067760ed48d3f2f639ce7909a4f7

13 Sep 2019

The court upheld the conviction under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, emphasizing strict compliance with excise laws and proof beyond reasonable doubt for illegal liquor possession.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act illegal liquor possession excise laws seizure procedure

cae9c77b00204bfbd9ac0793a4bf7dd1287c6b9989ce21a6f7639f682efbd403

03 Sep 2019 · 2019 INSC 990

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the petitioner for obstructing a police officer in the discharge of official duties under Section 70(2) of the Tamil Nadu Police Act, affirming the sufficiency of evidence and legal applicability.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant obstruction of public servant Section 70(2) Tamil Nadu Police Act police officer duties criminal conviction

31679a6e3524dbf2b944d64ac16545be2a8bc8033f3dddf930d152ea8970d517

03 Sep 2019

The court upheld the conviction under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for illegal possession and transportation of liquor, affirming the validity of seizure and chain of custody established by the prosecution.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act Section 70(2) illegal possession seizure validity

5b09ec6b72e95e39ee1d899725f5bf988508363b2c03cb43246f9c9f31763519

22 Aug 2019

The High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for forgery and cheating under IPC Sections 420, 464, 465, 467, 468, and 471, dismissing their appeals for lack of credible defense.

criminal appeal_dismissed forgery cheating Indian Penal Code burden of proof

0e6559ce9b0313d2b8cad46bf49d2ff0b7aaa4026e5614ea7ab5a49f78ca74d0

22 Aug 2019 · 2019 INSC 943
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the petitioner, affirming that the evidence and prior convictions sufficiently established guilt beyond reasonable doubt with due adherence to procedural safeguards.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant conviction sentence proof beyond reasonable doubt prior convictions

40912c0d4c64622145b951226891ddf6d054db1e882f00266642e15ba2e0c332

22 Aug 2019
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The court dismissed the petitioner’s appeal, upholding the conviction based on sufficient evidence and correct application of criminal law principles.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant conviction criminal procedure evidence fundamental rights

6168fc74f5167ab52f8c965bcc29cda46dcd09ce89fc1c726d67eff36ca79110

20 Aug 2019 · 2019 INSC 921

The court upheld the conviction under IPC Sections 197/36, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt with proper procedural compliance.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Penal Code Section 197 Section 36 Mens rea

അപ്പനീല്‍വഭാദത്തികള v. മകരള സഠസഭാനവഠ

16 Aug 2019 · INDU MALHOTRA; SANJIV KHANNA

The Supreme Court upheld the Land Tribunal's decision denying appellants' claim to private ownership and agricultural rights over land brought under government ownership under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 owner cultivator land ownership agricultural rights

13cbe6ab3b7d1da3cb6d273100ea4a762438cb05ee07ae8e5105576943cfbf30

13 Aug 2019

The court upheld the petitioner's lawful possession and ownership of disputed properties based on credible possession records and title documents, dismissing the respondent's claims.

property petition_allowed Significant property possession ownership dispute possession records property registers

cf9ef90b44c331bfee280e8b2e10a3e7572a4f32b9eca210d0b11b57de7ab851

08 Aug 2019 · 2019 INSC 884

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on reliable digital forensic evidence, affirming the admissibility and evidentiary value of electronic data in criminal proceedings under Section 196 CrPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant digital forensic evidence Section 196 CrPC chain of custody admissibility of electronic evidence