Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Saraf Exports v. Commissioner of Income Tax

10 Apr 2023 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that profits from DEPB and Duty Drawback schemes do not qualify as profits "derived from" an industrial undertaking under Section 80-IB and thus are not eligible for deduction, dismissing the assessee's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 80-IB Income Tax Act DEPB Scheme Duty Drawback profits derived from industrial undertaking

M/s Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner Commercial Taxes

10 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that Dettol Antiseptic Liquid is classifiable as a medicament under the Kerala VAT Act attracting 4% VAT, while upholding higher tax classifications for mosquito repellants and cleaning products.

tax appeal_allowed Significant classification Kerala VAT Act mosquito repellants insecticides

R. Hemalatha v. Kasthuri

10 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an unregistered Agreement to Sell compulsorily registrable under Tamil Nadu Amendment Act, 2012, is admissible in evidence in a suit for specific performance under the proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Agreement to Sell Registration Act Section 17(1)(g) Section 49 proviso

R. Hemalatha v. Kasthuri

10 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that an unregistered Agreement to Sell, though compulsorily registrable under the Tamil Nadu Amendment Act, 2012, is admissible in evidence in a suit for specific performance under the proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Agreement to Sell Registration Act Section 17(1)(g) Section 49 proviso

Bhimashankar Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamita v. Walchandnagar Industries Ltd.

10 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari · 2023 INSC 335

The Supreme Court held that the statutory maximum limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act cannot be extended by Section 4 of the Limitation Act or Section 10 of the General Clauses Act when it expires during court vacation, dismissing the appeal for condonation of delay beyond 120 days.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Limitation Act, 1963 General Clauses Act, 1897

Bhimashankar Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamita v. Walchandnagar Industries Ltd.

10 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that the statutory maximum limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act is mandatory and cannot be extended by Section 4 of the Limitation Act or Section 10 of the General Clauses Act when the last day falls during court vacation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Limitation Act, 1963 General Clauses Act, 1897

NTPC LTD v. M/S SPML INFRA LTD

10 Apr 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in appointing an arbitral tribunal under Section 11(6) as the Settlement Agreement was valid and allegations of coercion were not prima facie credible, thus no subsisting arbitrable dispute existed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act pre-referral jurisdiction prima facie review arbitrability

International Pvt. Ltd v. The Commissioner

10 Apr 2023 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that penalty under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act is not leviable for belated remittance of TDS after deduction, limiting penalty to failure to deduct tax at source.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 271C Tax Deducted at Source Belated remittance Penalty

The State of Bihar v. Jawahar Lal Ram

10 Apr 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Aravind Kumar

The Supreme Court directed absorption of employees with continuity of service under Article 142, setting aside the High Court's order reversing their termination despite procedural irregularities in the regularization scheme.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization absorption Article 142 continuous service

Mansarovar Commercial Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi

10 Apr 2023 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that companies incorporated in Sikkim were residents of India due to control and management being in Delhi, validating reassessment and service of notices under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment years prior to the Act's extension to Sikkim.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 6(3) control and management residence of company

Mansarovar Commercial Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi

10 Apr 2023 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld that companies incorporated in Sikkim were residents of India due to control and management in Delhi, validating reassessment notices and tax liability under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for pre-extension years.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 6(3) control and management residence of company

Rajalakshmi v. The Special Tahsildar (LA) Koyilandy & Another

10 Apr 2023 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar · 2023 INSC 333

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquired for an IT Park, holding that negotiated price is relevant but not binding and awarding a 60% rise over the negotiated price as just compensation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation negotiated price just compensation

Rajalakshmi v. The Special Tahsildar (LA) Koyilandy & Another

10 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquired for an IT Park by increasing the High Court's award from Rs. 1,35,000/- to Rs. 1,60,000/- per cent, holding that negotiated price is a relevant factor but just compensation requires reasonable enhancement.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 compensation negotiated price sale exemplar

KA RAUF SHERIF v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

10 Apr 2023 · V. Ramasubramanian; Pankaj Mithal

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a PMLA money laundering case from Lucknow to Kerala, holding that territorial jurisdiction is determined by the place of money laundering activities and not by residence of accused or witnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act territorial jurisdiction Special Court money laundering

Ajay Shankar Srivastava v. Bar Council of India

10 Apr 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; J B P...

The Supreme Court constituted a High Powered Committee to monitor verification of advocates' educational and enrollment certificates, directing State Bar Councils and universities to cooperate fully to preserve the integrity of the legal profession.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Bar Council of India verification of advocates fake degrees administration of justice

Ajay Shankar Srivastava v. Bar Council of India

10 Apr 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; J B P...

The Supreme Court upheld the necessity of verifying advocates' educational qualifications and enrollment certificates, constituted a High Powered Committee to oversee the process, and directed all stakeholders to cooperate to preserve the integrity of the legal profession.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Bar Council of India verification of advocates educational certificates fake degrees

National Capital Territory of Delhi v. Subhash Chander Khatri

10 Apr 2023 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken prior to the Act's commencement, even if compensation was unpaid, and set aside the High Court's order granting compensation on lapse grounds.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act deemed lapse land acquisition possession

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Vikas Mishra

10 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court allowed CBI's appeal to grant police custody remand beyond 15 days where the accused frustrated interrogation by hospitalization and interim bail, overruling the strict 15-day limit in such circumstances.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant police custody remand statutory bail Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. interim bail cancellation

HARYANA POWER PURCHASE CENTRE v. SASAN POWER LTD

06 Apr 2023 · K. M. Joseph; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that while bidders must verify information independently, procurers cannot escape liability for grossly erroneous data affecting project costs, directing fresh consideration of water intake cost claims but rejecting customs duty claims on mining equipment as Change in Law.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Section 63 Change in Law Power Purchase Agreement

HARYANA POWER PURCHASE CENTRE v. SASAN POWER LTD

06 Apr 2023 · K. M. Joseph; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal directing reconsideration of compensation for increased water intake costs due to erroneous pre-bid reports but upheld rejection of customs duty claims on mining equipment under the Electricity Act, 2003 framework.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Section 63 Power Purchase Agreement Change in Law