Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

Prasanta Kumar Sahoo v. Charulata Sahu

29 Mar 2023 · A.S. Bopanna; J.B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld daughters' equal coparcenary rights under the 2005 Amendment, invalidated a challenged settlement deed, and affirmed partition shares accordingly.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act 1956 Section 6 Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005 coparcenary rights

Geeta & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors.

29 Mar 2023 · Rajesh Bindal; Aravind Kumar

The Supreme Court upheld the expulsion of a cooperative society member for non-payment of dues, affirming that procedural lapses do not invalidate expulsion when substantive default is established.

civil appeal_dismissed cooperative society expulsion non-payment of dues Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972

Anwar v. Haryana State

29 Mar 2023 · Rajesh Bandal

The High Court allowed the appeal and acquitted the appellant due to serious doubts in prosecution evidence and questionable recovery of a weapon.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery dacoity Indian Penal Code Section 394 Indian Penal Code Section 397

Anwar @ Bhugra v. State of Haryana

29 Mar 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Sections 394, 397 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act due to serious discrepancies in prosecution evidence and doubtful recovery of the weapon.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Sections 394 and 397 IPC Section 25 Arms Act recovery of weapon hostile witnesses

CCE, AURANGABAD v. M/S VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD

29 Mar 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court upheld CESTAT’s classification of imported LCD panels under Chapter 90.13.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices, rejecting revenue’s claim for classification under Chapter 85 parts headings.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Tariff Act, 1975 Classification of goods Liquid Crystal Devices Chapter 90

M P High Court Bar Association v. Union of India & Ors

29 Mar 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; J B P...

The Supreme Court upheld mandatory e-filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals while directing infrastructural support and grievance mechanisms to ensure equitable access to justice.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant e-filing Debt Recovery Tribunals Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993

Shivshankara & Anr. v. H.P. Vedavyasa Char

29 Mar 2023 · B.R. Gavai; C.T. Ravikumar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld concurrent findings that a suit based on prior possession is maintainable and dismissed the appeal challenging possession recovery and refusal to allow amendment of pleadings at appellate stage.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant prior possession permanent injunction amendment of pleadings non-joinder of parties

Pipnak Pani Mohanty v. Union of India and Others

29 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar · 2023 INSC 320

The Court directed partial disbursement of funds lying in the Sahara-SEBI Refund Account to rightful cooperative society depositors under judicial oversight to ensure transparent and just distribution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Sahara-SEBI Refund Account Cooperative Societies Deposit Disbursement Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies

Pinak Pani Mohanty v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court directed the transfer of Rs. 5,000 crore from the Sahara-SEBI refund account to the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies for transparent distribution to Sahara Group cooperative society depositors under judicial supervision.

civil petition_allowed Significant Sahara-SEBI refund account Cooperative societies Deposit recovery Fund transfer

Pinak Pani Mohanty v. Union of India

29 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court directed transfer of Rs. 5,000 Crores from the Sahara-SEBI Refund Account to the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies for transparent disbursal to genuine Sahara Group depositors under judicial supervision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Sahara-SEBI Refund Account Cooperative Societies Disbursement of funds Judicial supervision

Mohd Muslim @ Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi)

28 Mar 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta
Cites 3 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court allowed bail to an accused under the NDPS Act after prolonged pre-trial detention, holding that stringent bail conditions must be balanced with the constitutional right to a speedy trial and personal liberty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant right to speedy trial Article 21 Section 37 NDPS Act bail conditions

Yashpal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

28 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar · 2023 INSC 310

The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's bail orders in a serious murder case, holding that bail in such offences requires cogent reasons considering the gravity of the crime and the accused's conduct.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail serious offences Section 302 IPC unlawful assembly

Yashpal Singh v. Uttar Pradesh State

28 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. B. Ranit Kumar

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail orders for accused involved in serious offences including murder, emphasizing the need for concrete reasons before granting bail in heinous crimes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail serious offences murder Section 302 IPC

Yashpal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

28 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's bail orders in a serious murder case, emphasizing the need for cogent reasons considering the gravity of offences and rejecting bail granted without such reasons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail serious offences Section 302 IPC unlawful assembly

Shiva Kumar @ Shiva @ Shivamurthy v. State of Karnataka

28 Mar 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 306
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that only Constitutional Courts can impose modified life sentences exceeding fourteen years, not limited to death penalty commutation cases, and accordingly modified the appellant's sentence to life imprisonment with a minimum of thirty years actual incarceration.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant modified sentence life imprisonment death penalty commutation Section 302 IPC

Shiva Kumar @ Shiva @ Shivamurthy v. State of Karnataka

28 Mar 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that only Constitutional Courts can impose modified life sentences exceeding fourteen years, not limited to death penalty commutation cases, and modified the appellant's sentence to life imprisonment with a minimum of thirty years' incarceration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant modified sentence life imprisonment death penalty Section 302 IPC

Tajvir Singh Sodhi v. State of Jammu and Kashmir

28 Mar 2023 · B. V. Nagarathna; K. M. Joseph · 2023 INSC 309

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of a flawed drug inspector selection process in Jammu and Kashmir due to procedural irregularities, emphasizing limited judicial interference in expert committee decisions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant judicial review selection process public employment drug inspectors

Tajvir Singh Sodhi v. State of Jammu and Kashmir

28 Mar 2023 · K. M. Joseph; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of a flawed drug inspector selection process in Jammu and Kashmir due to procedural irregularities but limited judicial interference to legality and mala fide, emphasizing expert committee autonomy.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant judicial review selection process drug inspectors Jammu and Kashmir

Pulon Kon v. Assam Government

28 Mar 2023 · D. R. Bhavai; Dhakram Naray; Sanjay Kalaral · 2023 INSC 305

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder as members of an unlawful assembly, affirming that consistent prosecution evidence and collective liability under Section 149 IPC sustain conviction despite minor procedural lapses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC murder collective liability

Pulen Phukan & Ors. v. The State of Assam

28 Mar 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court set aside the convictions for murder and related offences due to inconsistent prosecution evidence and unexplained police presence during the incident, granting benefit of doubt to the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unlawful assembly common object Section 149 IPC murder