Supreme Court of India

17,225 judgments

Year:

Prem Kishore & Ors v. Brahm Prakash & Ors.

29 Mar 2023 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; J. B. Pardiwala · 2023 INSC 317

The Supreme Court held that dismissal of an eviction petition for failure to produce evidence under Order 17 Rule 2 CPC is not a decision on merits and does not bar a subsequent eviction petition on the same issue under the doctrine of res judicata.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Order 17 Rule 2 CPC Order 17 Rule 3 CPC

Prem Kishore & Ors v. Brahm Prakash & Ors.

29 Mar 2023 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court held that dismissal of an eviction petition for default without evidence under Order 17 Rule 2 CPC is not a decision on merits and does not bar a subsequent eviction petition by res judicata, thus allowing the appeal and setting aside the High Court's order rejecting the plaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Order 17 Rule 2 CPC Order 17 Rule 3 CPC

Prasanta Kumar Sahoo v. Charulata Sahu

29 Mar 2023 · A.S. Bopanna; J.B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld daughters' equal coparcenary rights under the 2005 Amendment, invalidated a challenged settlement deed, and affirmed partition shares accordingly.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act 1956 Section 6 Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005 coparcenary rights

Geeta & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors.

29 Mar 2023 · Rajesh Bindal; Aravind Kumar

The Supreme Court upheld the expulsion of a cooperative society member for non-payment of dues, affirming that procedural lapses do not invalidate expulsion when substantive default is established.

civil appeal_dismissed cooperative society expulsion non-payment of dues Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972

Anwar @ Bhugra v. State of Haryana

29 Mar 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Sections 394, 397 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act due to serious discrepancies in prosecution evidence and doubtful recovery of the weapon.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Sections 394 and 397 IPC Section 25 Arms Act recovery of weapon hostile witnesses

CCE, AURANGABAD v. M/S VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD

29 Mar 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court upheld CESTAT’s classification of imported LCD panels under Chapter 90.13.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices, rejecting revenue’s claim for classification under Chapter 85 parts headings.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Tariff Act, 1975 Classification of goods Liquid Crystal Devices Chapter 90

M P High Court Bar Association v. Union of India & Ors

29 Mar 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; J B P...

The Supreme Court upheld mandatory e-filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals while directing infrastructural support and grievance mechanisms to ensure equitable access to justice.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant e-filing Debt Recovery Tribunals Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993

Shivshankara & Anr. v. H.P. Vedavyasa Char

29 Mar 2023 · B.R. Gavai; C.T. Ravikumar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld concurrent findings that a suit based on prior possession is maintainable and dismissed the appeal challenging possession recovery and refusal to allow amendment of pleadings at appellate stage.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant prior possession permanent injunction amendment of pleadings non-joinder of parties

Pinak Pani Mohanty v. Union of India

29 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court directed transfer of Rs. 5,000 Crores from the Sahara-SEBI Refund Account to the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies for transparent disbursal to genuine Sahara Group depositors under judicial supervision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Sahara-SEBI Refund Account Cooperative Societies Disbursement of funds Judicial supervision

Mohd Muslim @ Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi)

28 Mar 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta
Cites 3 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court allowed bail to an accused under the NDPS Act after prolonged pre-trial detention, holding that stringent bail conditions must be balanced with the constitutional right to a speedy trial and personal liberty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant right to speedy trial Article 21 Section 37 NDPS Act bail conditions

Yashpal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

28 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar · 2023 INSC 310

The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's bail orders in a serious murder case, holding that bail in such offences requires cogent reasons considering the gravity of the crime and the accused's conduct.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail serious offences Section 302 IPC unlawful assembly

Yashpal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

28 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's bail orders in a serious murder case, emphasizing the need for cogent reasons considering the gravity of offences and rejecting bail granted without such reasons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail serious offences Section 302 IPC unlawful assembly

Shiva Kumar @ Shiva @ Shivamurthy v. State of Karnataka

28 Mar 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 306
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that only Constitutional Courts can impose modified life sentences exceeding fourteen years, not limited to death penalty commutation cases, and accordingly modified the appellant's sentence to life imprisonment with a minimum of thirty years actual incarceration.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant modified sentence life imprisonment death penalty commutation Section 302 IPC

Shiva Kumar @ Shiva @ Shivamurthy v. State of Karnataka

28 Mar 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that only Constitutional Courts can impose modified life sentences exceeding fourteen years, not limited to death penalty commutation cases, and modified the appellant's sentence to life imprisonment with a minimum of thirty years' incarceration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant modified sentence life imprisonment death penalty Section 302 IPC

Tajvir Singh Sodhi v. State of Jammu and Kashmir

28 Mar 2023 · B. V. Nagarathna; K. M. Joseph · 2023 INSC 309

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of a flawed drug inspector selection process in Jammu and Kashmir due to procedural irregularities, emphasizing limited judicial interference in expert committee decisions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant judicial review selection process public employment drug inspectors

Tajvir Singh Sodhi v. State of Jammu and Kashmir

28 Mar 2023 · K. M. Joseph; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of a flawed drug inspector selection process in Jammu and Kashmir due to procedural irregularities but limited judicial interference to legality and mala fide, emphasizing expert committee autonomy.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant judicial review selection process drug inspectors Jammu and Kashmir

Pulen Phukan & Ors. v. The State of Assam

28 Mar 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court set aside the convictions for murder and related offences due to inconsistent prosecution evidence and unexplained police presence during the incident, granting benefit of doubt to the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unlawful assembly common object Section 149 IPC murder

Pulen Phukan & Ors. v. State of Assam

28 Mar 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the murder convictions due to inconsistent evidence, unexplained police presence during the crime, and procedural irregularities, granting benefit of doubt to the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unlawful assembly common object benefit of doubt police presence

Abhishek Singh v. Huhtamaki PPL Ltd. & Anr.

28 Mar 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath · 2023 INSC 308

The Supreme Court held that withdrawal of CIRP applications under section 12A of IBC before constitution of CoC is permissible upon bona fide settlement, and the NCLT must apply Regulation 30A and its inherent powers to allow such withdrawal.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 12A IBC Regulation 30A IBBI Regulations Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Abhishek Singh v. Huhtamaki PPL Ltd. & Anr.

28 Mar 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that withdrawal of CIRP applications under section 12A of IBC before constitution of the Committee of Creditors is permissible under Regulation 30A and the inherent powers of the NCLT, allowing settlement-based withdrawal despite alleged moratorium violations and other creditor claims.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 12A IBC Regulation 30A IBBI Regulations Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process