Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

M/S NANDAN BIOMATRIX LTD. v. S. AMBIKA DEVI & ORS.

06 Mar 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that a small farmer growing crops under a buyback agreement is a "consumer" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and is entitled to its protection against seed companies.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant consumer protection Section 2(d) Consumer Protection Act commercial purpose self-employment

Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal

06 Mar 2020 · Arun Mishra; Indira Banerjee; Vineet Saran; M. R. Shah; S. R... · 2020 INSC 294

The Supreme Court held that under Section 24(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, acquisition lapses only if neither possession is taken nor compensation is paid (tendered), reading 'or' conjunctively, and clarified the meaning of 'paid' and the effect of interim court orders.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24 Right to Fair Compensation Act 2013 Land Acquisition Act 1894 Interpretation of 'paid' and 'tender' Lapsing of acquisition

Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal

06 Mar 2020 · Arun Mishra; Indira Banerjee; Vineet Saran; M. R. Shah; S. R...
Cites 8 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act only if both possession is not taken and compensation is not paid (tendered), interpreting 'or' conjunctively and clarifying that tendering compensation suffices even if refused.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation payment

Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur v. M/s Universal Ferro & Allied Chemicals Ltd.

06 Mar 2020 · S.A. Bobde; B.R. Gavai; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court upheld that EOUs undertaking job-work for DTA units with valid permissions under the EXIM Policy are entitled to exemption from excise duty under the relevant notification, rejecting Revenue's demand for duty and penalties.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Export Oriented Unit EXIM Policy Central Excise Act exemption notification

M.S. Bhavani and Anr. v. M.S. Raghu Nandan

05 Mar 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that a Will granting absolute ownership to a widow over property empowers her to validly sell it without consulting heirs, rendering a clandestine sale deed binding despite heirs' objections.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will interpretation absolute ownership life interest sale deed validity

Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/s. Chetak Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

05 Mar 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2020 INSC 279

The Supreme Court held that a company succeeding a partnership firm by conversion under Part IX of the Companies Act is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act for infrastructure projects entered into by the firm.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 80-IA deduction Part IX Companies Act conversion of partnership firm statutory vesting

Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/s. Chetak Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

05 Mar 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a company succeeding a partnership firm under Part IX of the Companies Act is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act for operating an infrastructure facility, as all rights and liabilities vest by operation of law in the company.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 80-IA deduction Part IX Companies Act conversion of partnership firm statutory vesting

Suborno Bose v. Enforcement Directorate

05 Mar 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a Managing Director who takes charge after an initial contravention under FEMA but fails to rectify the continuing offence is liable for penalty under Section 10(6) and Section 42 of the FEMA Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 Section 10(6) FEMA Continuing offence Managing Director liability

Manoj Suryavanshi v. State of Chhattisgarh

05 Mar 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee; M. R. Shah
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of the appellant for the brutal murder of three minor children based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and proper procedural compliance.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence death penalty Section 302 IPC Section 364 IPC

Mankastu Impex Private Limited v. Airvisual Limited

05 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the arbitration seat being Hong Kong excludes Indian courts' jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act to appoint an arbitrator, dismissing the petition accordingly.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant seat of arbitration venue of arbitration international commercial arbitration Section 11 Arbitration Act

Mankastu Impex Private Limited v. Airvisual Limited

05 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the arbitration seat being Hong Kong excludes Indian courts' jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act to appoint an arbitrator, dismissing the petition and directing the parties to approach the Hong Kong arbitration institution.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant seat of arbitration venue of arbitration international commercial arbitration Section 11 Arbitration Act

UCO Bank v. National Textile Corporation Ltd.

05 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court upheld quashing of arbitration proceedings under PMA but held that liability of National Textile Corporation Ltd. for dues of Shree Sitaram Mills Ltd. must be adjudicated in recovery proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Permanent Machinery of Arbitrators Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act recovery proceedings Debts Recovery Tribunal

UCO Bank v. National Textile Corporation Ltd.

05 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court upheld quashing of arbitration proceedings under PMA for lack of jurisdiction but set aside the High Court's conclusion on liability, leaving the question of liability and recovery to be decided in appropriate recovery proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Permanent Machinery of Arbitrators Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act liability after nationalisation arbitration jurisdiction

Union of India v. M.V. Mohanan Nair

05 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that under the MACP Scheme, financial upgradation is limited to the next higher grade pay and not the promotional hierarchy, and that dismissal of an SLP on technical grounds does not create binding precedent.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme MACP Assured Career Progression Scheme ACP

M/S SUPER MALLS PRIVATE LIMITED v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

05 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a single satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer suffices under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act when the same officer has jurisdiction over both the searched person and the other person, dismissing the assessee's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153C Income Tax Act satisfaction note search and seizure Assessing Officer jurisdiction

M/S SUPER MALLS PRIVATE LIMITED v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

05 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a single satisfaction note by the same Assessing Officer for both searched person and assessee satisfies Section 153C requirements, dismissing the assessee's appeal challenging the validity of the assessment.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153C Income Tax Act satisfaction note search and seizure Assessing Officer

Ankit Ashok Jalan v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Mar 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Hemant Gupta
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the Detaining Authority under COFEPOSA must independently and expeditiously consider representations against detention orders without deferring to the Central Advisory Board's opinion.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant preventive detention COFEPOSA Act detention order representation

Hindustan Construction Company Ltd v. NHPC Ltd

04 Mar 2020 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that where the seat of arbitration is designated, only courts at that seat have jurisdiction over arbitration proceedings, and transferred all related petitions filed elsewhere to the court at the seat.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration seat jurisdiction Section 42 Arbitration Act Section 34 challenge

Hindustan Construction Company Ltd v. NHPC Ltd

04 Mar 2020 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that when the seat of arbitration is designated, only the courts at that seat have jurisdiction over arbitral proceedings, and applications filed elsewhere must be transferred accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration seat Section 42 Arbitration Act jurisdiction Section 34 challenge

Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Bank Maryadit v. Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit

04 Mar 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Central Cooperative Banks receiving State Government funds must appoint their CEOs from cadres deputed by the Apex Society under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, harmonizing the 2016 amendment with existing provisions to preserve regulatory control.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Cooperative Societies Act 1960 Section 54(3) Section 49-E(2) Chief Executive Officer appointment