Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

N Paraeswaran Unni v. G Kannan

· N. V. Ramana; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that a statutory notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is validly served if sent by registered post within fifteen days of cheque dishonour intimation, and a subsequent delayed notice does not invalidate the complaint, thereby restoring the conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Statutory notice Service of notice

Chhanga @ Manoj v. State of M.P.

· Rohinton Fali Nariman; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC for attempted murder by bomb attack, affirming that intention to kill can be inferred from circumstances even if injuries are simple.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention attempt to murder

State of Uttarakhand & Ors. v. Kumaon Stone Crusher

· Ashok Bhushan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that transit fee under the Indian Forest Act can only be levied on forest produce as defined therein, excluding finished products and minerals regulated under the Mines and Minerals Act, and clarified the interpretation of 'brought from a forest' and the scope of State legislative competence.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant transit fee Indian Forest Act, 1927 forest produce manufacturing process

Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai v. M/s. Essar Teleholdings Ltd

· A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules prescribing the method for disallowance under Section 14A is prospective and cannot be applied retrospectively to assessment years prior to 2007-08.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 14A Income Tax Act Rule 8D Income Tax Rules Retrospective operation Prospective operation

United Bank of India and others v. United Bank of India Retirees’ Welfare Association and others

· Uday Umesh Lalit; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of differential dearness relief rates for pre- and post-November 2002 retirees of United Bank of India, rejecting claims for uniform payment based on the distinct pension schemes and bipartite settlements.

labor appeal_allowed Significant dearness relief pension retirees classification

Kalim Khan v. Fimidabee

· Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud · 2018 INSC 573
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an accident arising from the use of a stationary tractor's battery to trigger blasting explosives qualifies as a motor vehicle accident under the Motor Vehicles Act, remanding the issue of insurer's liability for compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant use of motor vehicle motor accident claim Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act insurance policy breach

State of Karnataka v. P. Ravikumar @ Ravi

· R. Banumathi; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of two accused in a murder case, holding that extra-judicial confessions without corroboration and circumstantial evidence insufficient to prove conspiracy do not warrant conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed extra-judicial confession Section 302 IPC conspiracy to murder benefit of doubt

State of Karnataka v. Srinivasa

· R. Banumathi; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder case where medical evidence did not conclusively prove homicidal death, granting the accused benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC Acquittal Benefit of doubt Medical evidence

State of Karnataka v. Srinivasa

· R. Banumathi; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder case due to inconclusive medical evidence and the possibility of suicide, granting the accused the benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC homicidal death suicide medical evidence

State of Karnataka v. A.B. Mahesha

· R. Banumathi; Vineet Saran · 2018 INSC 702

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused due to material contradictions in prosecution evidence creating reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed acquittal contradictory evidence last seen alive recovery of stolen property

State of Karnataka v. A.B. Mahesha

· R. Banumathi; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused due to material contradictions in prosecution evidence creating reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed last seen theory recovery of stolen property contradictory evidence reasonable doubt

Subhash Mahto v. State of Bihar

· R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee · 2018 INSC 838

The Supreme Court upheld the life imprisonment conviction of Subhash Mahto for murder under Section 302 IPC, dismissing his appeal and rejecting his claim for differential treatment or benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder life imprisonment overt act

Subhash Mahto v. State of Bihar

· R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld the life imprisonment conviction of Subhash Mahto for murder under Section 302 IPC based on specific overt acts and eyewitness evidence, dismissing his appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder common intention overt act

M/S BEE GEE CORPORATION PVT. LTD v. PUNJAB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

· R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld a court auction sale in favor of a decree holder purchaser, ruling that procedural requirements under Order 21 Rules 72 and 85 CPC were duly complied with and the sale was valid.

civil appeal_dismissed Order 21 Rule 72 CPC Order 21 Rule 85 CPC auction sale decree holder

The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Hansraj @ Hansu

· R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee · 2018 INSC 807

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the accused due to the prosecution's failure to prove proper custody and timely analysis of seized narcotic substances.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant chain of custody NDPS Act Excise Act delay in sample analysis

The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Hansraj @ Hansu

· R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused under the NDPS and Excise Acts due to failure of the prosecution to prove proper custody and preservation of seized contraband, emphasizing the necessity of an unbroken chain of custody.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant chain of custody NDPS Act Excise Act delay in sample analysis

Bhagirath v. State of Madhya Pradesh

· R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee · 2018 INSC 975

The Supreme Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under the sudden fight exception, reducing his sentence accordingly and allowing the appeal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-I IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC sudden fight

Bhagirath v. State of Madhya Pradesh

· R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, reducing his sentence to the period already served and allowing the appeal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-I IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC sudden fight

Mahender Chawla & Ors v. Union of India & Ors

· A. K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court directed the nationwide implementation of the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018, recognizing the State's constitutional duty to protect witnesses to ensure fair trials and uphold the rule of law.

criminal other Significant witness protection hostile witness Article 21 fair trial

Forech India Ltd v. Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd

· R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code override pending winding up petitions before High Courts where notice has been served, affirming the primacy of the Code and the jurisdiction of the NCLT.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 winding up petition Companies Act, 1956 Companies Act, 2013