Supreme Court of India

17,225 judgments

Year:

Siju Kurian v. State of Karnataka

17 Apr 2023 · Surya Kant; Aravind Kumar
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of acquittal and conviction of the accused for murder and related offences based on proper reappreciation of circumstantial evidence and admissible confession leading to discovery.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence confession under Section 27 Evidence Act last seen theory appellate review of acquittal

Soundarajan v. State

17 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to failure of prosecution to prove demand of gratification and held that defective charge framing without prejudice is not fatal under Section 464 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 PC Act Section 13(1)(d) PC Act demand of gratification

Yedala Subba Rao & Anr. v. Union of India

17 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court granted bail to accused under UAPA, holding that the prosecution failed to establish prima facie truth of accusations and that confessional statements were inadmissible, emphasizing protection of fundamental rights during prolonged pre-trial custody.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant UAPA bail provisions Section 43D UAPA Section 27 Evidence Act confessional statements admissibility

Yedala Subba Rao & Anr. v. Union of India

17 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 1 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court allowed bail to accused under UAPA, holding that the prosecution material was insufficient to prima facie prove their involvement, and that confessional statements and recoveries were inadmissible or unconnected.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant UAPA bail provisions Section 43D UAPA confessional statements admissibility Section 27 Evidence Act

Improvement Trust, Ropar v. Shashi Bala

17 Apr 2023 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Kumar

The Supreme Court held that allotments under the Government's discretionary quota for residential plots under Punjab Town Improvement Rules, 1983, are void for arbitrariness, and set aside the High Court's direction to allot a plot to the respondent social worker.

property appeal_allowed Significant discretionary quota allotment of plots Article 14 Punjab Town Improvement Rules 1983

State of Rajasthan v. Asharam @ Ashumal

17 Apr 2023 · Sanjiv Khanna; M. M. Sundresh
Cites 2 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court order allowing additional evidence under Section 391 CrPC, holding that the discretion to admit such evidence at appellate stage must be exercised cautiously and the claim of witness tutoring based on a video recording was unsubstantiated.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 391 CrPC additional evidence appellate discretion tutoring of witness

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Santosh Karnani

17 Apr 2023 · Surya Kant; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's grant of anticipatory bail to an Income Tax officer accused of corruption, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and rejecting doubts about the prosecution's prima facie case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 custodial interrogation Section 17A

Soundarajan v. State

17 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to failure of prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of gratification and held that omission in framing charge was not fatal without prejudice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 PC Act Section 13(1)(d) PC Act demand and acceptance of gratification

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Santosh Karnani

17 Apr 2023 · Surya Kant; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's grant of anticipatory bail to an IRS officer accused of demanding and accepting bribe, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation for effective investigation in corruption cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 custodial interrogation Section 438 CrPC

Shiv Mangal Ahirwar v. State of Madhya Pradesh

13 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's murder conviction but modified his life sentence to 30 years rigorous imprisonment without remission, clarifying that only Constitutional Courts can impose modified life sentences.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant life imprisonment modified sentence fixed-term sentence murder

Parsvnath Developers Ltd. v. Gagandeep Brar

13 Apr 2023 · M.R. Shah; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that compensation for delay in construction under the Flat Buyer Agreement must be shared between the Developer and Chandigarh Housing Board in a 70:30 ratio as per a binding arbitration award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Flat Buyer Agreement compensation arbitration award liability apportionment

B. S. HARI COMMANDANT v. UNION OF INDIA

13 Apr 2023 · Krishna Murari; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction and sentence of a BSF Commandant for alleged smuggling-related offences due to lack of direct evidence and disproportionate punishment, and ordered restoration of his pension and retiral benefits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Border Security Force Act, 1968 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 General Security Force Court Acetic Anhydride

B. S. HARI COMMANDANT v. UNION OF INDIA

13 Apr 2023 · Krishna Murari; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction and sentence of a BSF Commandant for smuggling-related charges due to lack of direct evidence and disproportionate punishment, restoring his pension and retiral benefits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Border Security Force Act, 1968 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 General Security Force Court proportionality of punishment

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Harsolia Motors and Others

13 Apr 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar · 2023 INSC 367

The Supreme Court held that commercial enterprises taking insurance policies for indemnification of loss qualify as consumers under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as such insurance contracts are not for commercial purpose aimed at profit generation.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 commercial purpose insurance contract contract of indemnity

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Harsolia Motors and Others

13 Apr 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that commercial enterprises taking insurance policies for indemnification of loss are consumers under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and their complaints against insurers are maintainable before consumer forums.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 commercial purpose insurance contract contract of indemnity

Parsvnath Developers Ltd. v. Gagandeep Brar

13 Apr 2023 · M.R. Shah; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that compensation for delay in construction under the Flat Buyer Agreement must be shared between the Developer and Chandigarh Housing Board in a 70:30 ratio as per the binding arbitration award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Flat Buyer Agreement compensation arbitration award liability apportionment

Anil Agarwal Foundation v. State of Orissa

12 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of land acquisition proceedings for Vedanta University, holding that acquisition in favor of a private company without strict compliance with statutory provisions is illegal and void.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 44B Section 41 agreement Public company

Anil Agarwal Foundation v. State of Orissa

12 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of land acquisition proceedings for Vedanta University due to non-compliance with statutory provisions and invalid conversion of the beneficiary company, emphasizing strict adherence to land acquisition laws and protection of public interest.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 41 agreement Public company Section 5A objections

Sita Ram v. State of Uttar Pradesh

12 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and prosecution's failure to examine available independent witnesses, holding that guilt was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Eyewitness testimony Adverse inference Prosecution failure

Radhey Shyam & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan

12 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder due to unreliable eyewitness identification and unfair identification procedures, emphasizing the need for proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child witness eyewitness identification Section 302 IPC Section 148 IPC