Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Santosh Karnani

17 Apr 2023 · Surya Kant; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's grant of anticipatory bail to an IRS officer accused of demanding and accepting bribe, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation for effective investigation in corruption cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 custodial interrogation Section 438 CrPC

Shiv Mangal Ahirwar v. State of Madhya Pradesh

13 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's murder conviction but modified his life sentence to 30 years rigorous imprisonment without remission, clarifying that only Constitutional Courts can impose modified life sentences.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant life imprisonment modified sentence fixed-term sentence murder

Parsvnath Developers Ltd. v. Gagandeep Brar

13 Apr 2023 · M.R. Shah; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that compensation for delay in construction under the Flat Buyer Agreement must be shared between the Developer and Chandigarh Housing Board in a 70:30 ratio as per a binding arbitration award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Flat Buyer Agreement compensation arbitration award liability apportionment

B. S. HARI COMMANDANT v. UNION OF INDIA

13 Apr 2023 · Krishna Murari; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction and sentence of a BSF Commandant for alleged smuggling-related offences due to lack of direct evidence and disproportionate punishment, and ordered restoration of his pension and retiral benefits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Border Security Force Act, 1968 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 General Security Force Court Acetic Anhydride

B. S. HARI COMMANDANT v. UNION OF INDIA

13 Apr 2023 · Krishna Murari; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction and sentence of a BSF Commandant for smuggling-related charges due to lack of direct evidence and disproportionate punishment, restoring his pension and retiral benefits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Border Security Force Act, 1968 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 General Security Force Court proportionality of punishment

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Harsolia Motors and Others

13 Apr 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar · 2023 INSC 367

The Supreme Court held that commercial enterprises taking insurance policies for indemnification of loss qualify as consumers under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as such insurance contracts are not for commercial purpose aimed at profit generation.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 commercial purpose insurance contract contract of indemnity

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Harsolia Motors and Others

13 Apr 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that commercial enterprises taking insurance policies for indemnification of loss are consumers under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and their complaints against insurers are maintainable before consumer forums.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 commercial purpose insurance contract contract of indemnity

Parsvnath Developers Ltd. v. Gagandeep Brar

13 Apr 2023 · M.R. Shah; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that compensation for delay in construction under the Flat Buyer Agreement must be shared between the Developer and Chandigarh Housing Board in a 70:30 ratio as per the binding arbitration award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Flat Buyer Agreement compensation arbitration award liability apportionment

Anil Agarwal Foundation v. State of Orissa

12 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of land acquisition proceedings for Vedanta University, holding that acquisition in favor of a private company without strict compliance with statutory provisions is illegal and void.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 44B Section 41 agreement Public company

Anil Agarwal Foundation v. State of Orissa

12 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of land acquisition proceedings for Vedanta University due to non-compliance with statutory provisions and invalid conversion of the beneficiary company, emphasizing strict adherence to land acquisition laws and protection of public interest.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 41 agreement Public company Section 5A objections

Sita Ram v. State of Uttar Pradesh

12 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and prosecution's failure to examine available independent witnesses, holding that guilt was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Eyewitness testimony Adverse inference Prosecution failure

Radhey Shyam & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan

12 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder due to unreliable eyewitness identification and unfair identification procedures, emphasizing the need for proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child witness eyewitness identification Section 302 IPC Section 148 IPC

Kekhriesatuo Tep v. National Investigation Agency

12 Apr 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 362

The Supreme Court restored bail to appellants coerced into funding outlawed organizations, holding that absence of mens rea negates prima facie case under UAPA and High Court erred in cancelling bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Section 43D(5) mens rea

Kekhriesatuo Tep v. National Investigation Agency

12 Apr 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court restored bail to appellants under UAPA, holding that coerced payments without mens rea do not warrant denial of bail under Section 43D(5).

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Section 43D(5) mens rea

Dr. S.M. Mansoori Thr. L.R. v. Surekha Parmar & Ors.

12 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 363

The Supreme Court held that absence of prior sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. is not a ground to quash criminal proceedings at the initial stage when allegations prima facie show police officers acted beyond official duty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 Cr.P.C. prior sanction police jurisdiction quashing of complaint

Dr. S.M. Mansoori Thr. L.R. v. Surekha Parmar & Ors.

12 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that absence of prior sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. is not a ground to quash charges against police officers at the initial stage when they allegedly exceeded their authority, restoring the trial court's order framing charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 Cr.P.C. police jurisdiction prior sanction quashing of complaint

The Government of Tamil Nadu v. Tamil Nadu Makkal Nala Paniyalargal

11 Apr 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 INSC 350

The Supreme Court held that courts cannot direct creation of posts or regularization of temporary scheme-based employees and set aside the High Court’s order reinstating MNP workers, allowing the State’s appeal.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Makkal Nala Paniyalargal temporary employment scheme creation of posts regularization of service

The Government of Tamil Nadu v. Tamil Nadu Makkal Nala Paniyalargal

11 Apr 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court held that the State Government’s disbandment of a temporary rural employment scheme and termination of workers is lawful, rejecting judicial directions for reinstatement or regularization, and affirmed that creation of posts is an executive function beyond judicial domain.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Makkal Nala Paniyalargal temporary employment scheme regularization creation of posts

Bhagwani Devi, Bharat Bhusan v. State of Rajasthan

11 Apr 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Aravind Kumar · 2023 INSC 356

The Supreme Court held that the 1985 notification repealed earlier restrictions on land transfer, invalidating the State's resumption and restoring the appellant's rights.

property appeal_allowed Significant Rajasthan Colonization Act, 1954 notification repeal land alienation restrictions natural justice

Bhagwani Devi, Bharat Bhusan v. State of Rajasthan

11 Apr 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Aravind Kumar

The Supreme Court held that the repeal of a notification lifting land transfer restrictions prevails over subsequent notifications unless specifically applicable, restoring the appellant's right to the land and emphasizing the requirement of natural justice before land resumption.

property appeal_allowed Significant Rajasthan Colonization Act, 1954 land alienation restrictions notification repeal principle of natural justice