Supreme Court of India

18,255 judgments

Year:

Ghulam Nabi Dar v. State of J&K

· Altamas Kabir; Surinder Singh Nijjar; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that a settlement involving evacuee lands in possession of tenants is lawful and binding despite non-compliance with Rule 13-C of the 2008 Rules, and the Custodian cannot unilaterally withdraw from it.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Jammu and Kashmir State Evacuees' (Administration of Property) Act, 2006 Rule 13-C evacuee property tenants-at-will

Rajesh Patel v. State of Jharkhand

· V. Gopala Gowda; Chandramauli K.
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges due to improbabilities in the prosecution case, unexplained delay in FIR, and non-examination of key witnesses, emphasizing the need for corroboration of prosecutrix testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape Section 376 IPC prosecutrix testimony delay in FIR

State of Uttarakhand v. Yogendra Nath Arora & Anr.

· Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that repatriation does not amount to removal from office under Section 19(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, and only the parent State Government competent to remove the public servant can grant sanction for prosecution.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 19(1)(c) sanction for prosecution removal from office

Ram Deo Prasad v. State of Bihar

· Aftab Alam
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for rape and murder of a minor but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment due to procedural lapses and inadequate evidence quality.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant death penalty rape of minor murder circumstantial evidence

Antrix Corp. Ltd. v. Devas Multimedia P. Ltd.

· Altamas Kabir; Surinder Singh Nijjar

The Supreme Court held that once an Arbitral Tribunal is validly constituted under ICC Rules, a party cannot invoke Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act to appoint another Arbitrator, and challenges to the Tribunal's constitution must be raised before the Tribunal itself.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) ICC Rules UNCITRAL Rules

C.V. Francis v. Union of India

· Altamas Kabir; Anil R. Dave; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that voluntary retirement under a company scheme requires employer acceptance unless the scheme provides for deemed acceptance, and upheld termination of an employee who failed to join duty after refusal of voluntary retirement.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant voluntary retirement deemed acceptance disciplinary proceedings unauthorized absence

Yashwant Singh & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors.

· Altamas Kabir; Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court enforced the State of Bihar's undertaking to appoint trained teachers to vacant posts, upheld appointments already made, and directed aggrieved candidates to seek relief before the High Court without disturbing existing appointments.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant State undertaking appointment of trained teachers primary school vacancies contempt petition

Dharam Pal & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Anr.

· Altamas Kabir; Surinder Singh Nijjar; Ranjan Gogoi; M.Y. Eqb...

The Supreme Court held that upon committal, the Session Court can summon additional accused under Section 193 CrPC without waiting for Section 319 stage, and the Magistrate has jurisdiction to issue summons to persons named in column 2 of the police report if a prima facie case exists.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Committing Magistrate powers Section 193 CrPC Section 319 CrPC Summons to accused

Salil Bali v. Union of India

· Altamas Kabir; Surinder Singh Nijjar; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, affirming 18 years as the age of juvenility and rejecting petitions to try juveniles as adults for heinous offences.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Juvenile Justice Act 2000 age of juvenility constitutional validity rehabilitative justice

Faculty Association of AIIMS v. Union of India & Ors.

· Altamas Kabir; Surinder Singh Nijjar; Ranjan Gogoi; M.Y. Eqb...

The Supreme Court held that reservation is not applicable to super-specialty medical faculty posts at AIIMS, reaffirming the binding precedent that merit alone governs appointments at such high levels.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant reservation super-specialty medical posts AIIMS faculty appointments Indra Sawhney

M/s. Rana Girders Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

· Anil R. Dave; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a purchaser of land, building, and machinery in auction under the State Financial Corporation Act is not liable to pay excise dues of the previous owner unless the entire business is transferred as a going concern.

civil appeal_allowed Significant excise duty liability secured creditor priority State Financial Corporation Act successor liability

Putchalapalli Naresh Reddy v. State of A.P.

· S. A. Bobde; Dr. B. S. Chauhan

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of acquittal and conviction of accused for murder and related offences, modifying the sentence of one accused based on his limited role.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal murder Section 302 IPC Section 147 IPC

Anjanappa v. State of Karnataka

· Ranjana Prakash Desai
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld conviction based on a reliable dying declaration despite hostile witnesses, emphasizing the need for witness protection and rejecting the appellant's challenge to the evidence and procedural delays.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration dowry harassment hostile witnesses witness protection

Arun Kumar Agrawal v. Union of India & Ors.

· Surinder Singh Nijjar

The Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the appointment of Mr. U.K. Sinha as SEBI Chairman, holding that he fulfilled statutory integrity requirements and that his appointment was lawful and free from mala fide.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant SEBI Chairman appointment integrity requirement Section 4(5) SEBI Act IAS Cadre Rules deputation

Dipak Babaria v. State of Gujarat

· H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court upheld the legality of the State's permission for transfer of agricultural land for industrial use under the Tenancy Act, while emphasizing statutory compliance and rejecting claims of arbitrariness.

property appeal_allowed Significant Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958 Section 89A agricultural land transfer industrial purpose

Deepak Bhandari v. Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited

· K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for recovery suits by State Financial Corporations starts from the date of sale of mortgaged assets when the balance due is ascertained, not from the recall notice date.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant State Financial Corporations Act limitation period contract of indemnity guarantee

State of Maharashtra v. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal

· K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the termination of a 25-year-old departmental inquiry against a dismissed IAS officer, holding that continuation is impermissible post-dismissal and excessive delay justifies termination.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant departmental inquiry dismissal from service charge-sheet All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969

Vishal Agrawal v. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board

· K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that the 2007 amendment to Section 151 of the Electricity Act clarifying police powers to investigate cognizable offences applies retrospectively, validating FIR-based investigations and court cognizance on police reports.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Section 151 Police investigation Cognizance of offence

Radhey Shyam v. State of Rajasthan

· Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the murder conviction due to unreliable child witness testimony, inherent improbabilities, and lack of corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child witness testimony Section 302 IPC benefit of doubt corroboration

Satvir Singh v. State of Delhi through CBI

· Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court's acquittal of a customs officer accused of bribery, holding that prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of illegal gratification and that the High Court erred in reversing the acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 offence demand and acceptance of bribe statutory presumption under Section 20