Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Satvir Singh v. State of Delhi through CBI

· Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court's acquittal of a customs officer accused of bribery, holding that prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of illegal gratification and that the High Court erred in reversing the acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 offence demand and acceptance of bribe statutory presumption under Section 20

Rajiv Chowdhrie HUF v. Union of India & Ors.

· V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings initiated under the repealed Land Acquisition Act, 1894, lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if an award was made five or more years before the 2013 Act commenced and possession was not taken or compensation not paid.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse of acquisition proceedings physical possession

Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

· V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that land reservation under the MRTP Act lapses automatically if acquisition is not initiated within 10 years, invalidating subsequent Development Plan modifications imposing new reservations.

property appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act Section 127 Development Plan reservation lapsing of reservation

Raj Kumari & Anr v. Krishna & Ors

· Anil R. Dave; R.K. Agrwal; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that pension and retirement benefits belong to the first wife and daughter as per service rules, upheld the validity of the Will in favor of the second wife and her daughter for immovable properties, and set aside the High Court's contrary decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will validity Pension benefits Hindu Succession Act Inheritance

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India

· Jagdish Singh Khehar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the NJAC and the Ninety-ninth Amendment, reaffirmed the collegium system as part of the basic structure, and rejected recusal of the presiding judge despite his collegium membership.

constitutional other Significant collegium system National Judicial Appointments Commission judicial independence constitutional validity

Union of India v. Manjeet Singh

· M. Y. Eqbal; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of an Army serviceman to disability pension, holding that denial without cogent reasons by the Medical Board that disabilities were unconnected to service is illegal.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension Army service attributability aggravation

Harihar Prasad Padarha v. M/s. Kanha Wilderness Ltd.

· Anil R. Dave; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court quashed the impugned order due to improper bench composition and remitted the appeal for fresh hearing.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural appeal bench composition remand quash order

Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital v. Union of India

· KURIAN, J.

The Supreme Court clarified that recognition of medical qualifications under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 does not include admission capacity, which requires separate prior permission from the Central Government.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 recognition of medical qualifications permission for admission capacity Section 10A

Vishal Mahajan v. State of Punjab

· Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed the criminal appeal to delete the cost direction of Rs. 20,000 awarded by the High Court based on the appellant's correct statement regarding settlement.

criminal appeal_allowed costs settlement criminal appeal High Court order

M/S. CLASSIQUE INTERNATIONAL v. M/S. NIJINOY TRADING PVT. LTD.

· Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court directed parties disputing the payable amount under a settlement to approach the Executing Court for resolution and mediation, maintaining interim orders until further directions.

civil other settlement enforcement execution proceedings contempt petition mediation

Jaipal & Ors. v. State of U.P. Thr. Dist. Mag. & Anr.

· Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeals by setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the Reference Court's order in line with its earlier decision on similar facts, granting the appellants statutory benefits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Civil Appeal High Court judgment Reference Court order statutory benefits

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India

· Jagdish Singh Khehar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Justice Khehar need not recuse himself from hearing the constitutional challenge to the NJAC and the Ninety-ninth Amendment, emphasizing judicial independence and the need to first consider whether earlier precedents require reconsideration.

constitutional other Significant judicial appointments collegium system National Judicial Appointments Commission constitutional validity

Nanag Ram Sharma v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

· Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed an appellant to appear and make submissions before the High Court without being formally impleaded as a party, modifying the impugned order accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Procedural impleadment permission to appear High Court proceedings criminal appeal

Ramesh Chandra Tiwari v. State of Bihar

· Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court partly allowed the criminal appeal by remanding the matter to the High Court to examine the role of one accused, Shri Bishwanath Raut, while upholding the order for others.

criminal appeal_allowed criminal appeal role examination remand High Court

Vishal N. Kalsaria v. Bank of India

· V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that tenancy rights under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act are protected and cannot be overridden by the SARFAESI Act, requiring banks to follow due process before evicting tenants from mortgaged properties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Rent Control Act protected tenant tenancy rights

N.D. Sharma v. Union of India

· Anil R. Dave; Shiva Kirti Singh; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act should be enhanced to the same rate as adjacent land forming a contiguous parcel, awarding Rs. 32,951 per bigha with statutory benefits.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation enhancement contiguous land statutory benefits

Umapathy v. D.M., New India Insurance Co. Ltd.

· Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court restored the original compensation awarded to an injured auto rickshaw driver, setting aside the High Court's reduction, but upheld the reduced interest rate on the compensation.

civil appeal_allowed compensation workmen injury auto rickshaw driver damage to eyes

Ramesh Rajagopal v. Devi Polymers Private Limited

· S. A. Bobde; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a company director for alleged forgery and cheating related to a consultancy unit's website, holding no prima facie offence was made out and the prosecution was an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Forgery Cheating Information Technology Act

Dinesh Yadav v. State of Jharkhand

· Dipak Misra; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court modified the appellant's conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to grievous hurt under Section 326 IPC based on reliable eye-witness and medical evidence, while rejecting parity acquittal and non-examination of Investigating Officer as grounds for acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 326 IPC eye-witness evidence non-examination of Investigating Officer

Krishnegowda & Ors. v. State of Karnataka

· N. V. Ramana; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction and restored the Trial Court's acquittal due to material contradictions and investigative lapses undermining the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Acquittal Reasonable doubt Contradictions in evidence Ocular and medical evidence