Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Lok Prahari v. Union of India

27 Mar 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; J B P...
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 39-AA mandating open ballot voting in Rajya Sabha elections and the nomination requirements under Section 33 of the Representation of the People Act, dismissing challenges to these provisions.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant open ballot Council of States Rajya Sabha elections Rule 39-AA

Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary v. The State of Maharashtra

27 Mar 2023 · K. M. Joseph; Aniruddha Bose; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the convict was a juvenile at the time of the offence based on credible school records, invalidated his death sentence, and ordered his immediate release.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice juvenility claim age determination date of birth certificate

Swetab Kumar v. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change

27 Mar 2023 · Krishna Murari; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 301

The Supreme Court held that the immunity granted under the 2020 Advisory for possession of exotic species cannot be retrospectively nullified by the 2022 Amendment Act, emphasizing protection against ex post facto criminal laws and directing further public notice before enforcement.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022 Article 20(1) Constitution of India retroactive criminal legislation

Swetab Kumar v. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change

27 Mar 2023 · Krishna Murari; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court held that declarations under the 2020 Advisory grant immunity from prosecution under the 2022 Amendment Act unless proper procedural safeguards and public notice are provided, prohibiting retrospective criminalization.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022 Article 20(1) Constitution of India amnesty scheme

State Bank of India & Ors v. Rajesh Agarwal & Ors

27 Mar 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that principles of natural justice, including the right to be heard, must be read into RBI's Master Directions on Frauds before classifying borrower accounts as fraudulent due to serious civil consequences.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant RBI Master Directions on Frauds audi alteram partem natural justice fraud classification

Kamukayi & Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

26 Mar 2023 · Surya Kant; J. K. Maheshwari · 2023 INSC 541
Cites 4 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the deceased was a bona fide passenger who died due to an untoward railway incident, entitling the appellants to compensation under the Railways Act, setting aside lower courts' dismissals.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act 1989 untoward incident bona fide passenger compensation

Anil Minda and Others v. Commissioner of Income Tax

24 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that the two-year limitation period for block assessments under Section 158BE of the Income Tax Act begins from the date of the last Panchnama drawn, not the date of the last search authorization.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant block assessment Section 158BE limitation period search authorization

Anil Minda and Others v. Commissioner of Income Tax

24 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that the two-year limitation period for block assessments under Section 158BE of the Income Tax Act starts from the date of the last Panchnama drawn, not the last search authorization.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 158BE Income Tax Act block assessment limitation period search authorization

State of Tripura v. Chandan Deb

24 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Rule 3A(2) of the Tripura Sales Tax Rules, 1976 as a valid machinery provision for tax deduction at source on transfer of right to use goods, reversing the High Court's declaration of ultra vires.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Tripura Sales Tax Act, 1976 Rule 3A(2) tax deduction at source transfer of right to use goods

The State of Tripura v. Chandan Deb

24 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Rule 3A(2) of the Tripura Sales Tax Rules, 1976 as a valid machinery provision for tax deduction at source, reversing the High Court's declaration of ultra vires and affirming tax liability on transfer of right to use goods under the Tripura Sales Tax Act, 1976.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Tripura Sales Tax Act, 1976 Rule 3A(2) tax deduction at source transfer of right to use goods

Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana

24 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar · 2023 INSC 296

The Supreme Court held that parole periods granted under lawful authority do not count towards the total sentence period, dismissing the convict's petition challenging this exclusion.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant parole period sentence calculation temporary release Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners Act

Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana

24 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that the period of temporary or emergency parole granted under statutory provisions does not count towards the total sentence period of a convict, dismissing the petition challenging this principle.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant temporary parole emergency parole sentence calculation Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988

Mah. Adiwasi Thakur Jamat v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

24 Mar 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Manoj Misra
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the affinity test is not mandatory for every caste claim verification under Maharashtra law and is only to be conducted when documentary evidence is insufficient, affirming the quasi-judicial role of the Scrutiny Committee and emphasizing the probative value of pre-Constitution documents and valid caste certificates of blood relatives.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribes caste certificate affinity test Scrutiny Committee

Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel v. The State of Gujarat

24 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings in a family forgery dispute under Article 142, directing restitution to restore harmony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Article 142 of Constitution of India quashing of criminal proceedings family dispute forgery

Director General, Doordarshan Prasar Bharti Corporation of India & Anr. v. Magi H Desai

24 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that casual/contractual service prior to regularisation does not qualify as temporary service under pension rules and cannot be counted for pension benefits absent explicit provision.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant casual service contractual service temporary service qualifying service

Director General, Doordarshan Prasar Bharti Corporation of India & Anr. v. Magi H Desai

24 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that casual/contractual service prior to regularisation does not qualify as temporary service under pension rules and cannot be counted for pension benefits absent any statutory or scheme provision.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 qualifying service casual service contractual service

The State of Odisha v. Radheshyam Agrawal

24 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that penalty cannot be levied while granting extension of time under a contract unless expressly authorized, and set aside the penalty imposed by the State on a delayed contractor.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant extension of time penalty contract delay Odisha Public Works Department Code

The State of Odisha v. Radheshyam Agrawal

24 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that penalty cannot be levied while granting extension of time to a contractor unless expressly authorized by contract or law, and upheld the High Court's setting aside of such penalty imposed by the State.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant extension of time penalty contractor delay Odisha Public Works Department Code

MARSH INDIA INSURANCE BROKERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S ATKINS SPECIAL RISKS LTD.

24 Mar 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court upheld IRDA's dismissal of bribery allegations against an insurance broker, setting aside the appellate tribunal's order for fresh inquiry due to lack of cogent evidence.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority bribery allegations insurance brokerage Securities Appellate Tribunal

Arup Bhuyan v. State of Assam

24 Mar 2023 · M. R. Shah; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 292
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court holds that mere membership of a banned organization declared unlawful under UAPA is punishable without requiring proof of active participation or incitement, overruling earlier decisions that imposed such a requirement.

criminal other Significant Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Section 10(a)(i) mere membership banned organization