Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Delhi Development Authority v. Surender Singh

· Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that taking possession alone suffices to prevent lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, overruling earlier contrary precedent and allowing appeals by Delhi Development Authority.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 24(2) possession

03e9005d7cbd501a3d0314a5ff9bc0de1f3945f38e509957d145e1146b128982

· ആലക 28.89; എപ്രീം. ആര്‍. ഷഭാ; സതി. ടതി. രവതികുമഭാര്‍ · 2023 INSC 333

The Supreme Court upheld the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, including 35% solatium, dismissing appeals seeking further enhancement as unjustified.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Compensation Solatium Market value

f1503f0f4a921d5bb39cb1ec7eca8bfbbc8443c5d5234391ca6cabba2290d4d3

· A. R. Saha; Sathi Tati Ravikumbar

The Supreme Court upheld the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, including statutory solatium and interest, dismissing appeals challenging the adequacy of compensation and validity of sale deeds.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation solatium interest

ARTI DIXIT & ANR v. SUSHIL KUMAR MISHRA & ORS

· K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that failure to furnish valid and enforceable security as mandated by Section 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act renders an application to set aside an ex-parte decree incompetent, dismissing the appeal challenging eviction based on such decree.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 17 Provincial Small Cause Courts Act Order IX Rule 13 CPC ex-parte decree security for performance of decree

State of Uttarakhand and Anr. v. Ravi Kumar

· Surya Kant; J.K. Maheshwari · 2023 INSC 550

The Supreme Court remanded the dispute over ownership and tenancy rights of land leased under the Government Grants Act for fresh adjudication, emphasizing strict compliance with lease conditions including prior approval for transfer.

property other Significant Government Grants Act, 1895 Leasehold rights Prior approval Bhumidhar

State of Uttarakhand and Anr. v. Ravi Kumar

· Surya Kant; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court remanded the dispute over ownership of land leased under the Government Grants Act for fresh consideration of the validity of transfer and compliance with lease conditions, emphasizing strict adherence to prior approval requirements.

property other Significant Government Grants Act, 1895 prior approval leasehold rights Sale Deed validity

M/S. TATA MOTORS LTD. v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES

· K.M. Joseph; B.V. Nagarathna; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2023 INSC 533
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that replacement of defective automobile parts under warranty, with manufacturer-issued credit notes to dealers, constitutes a taxable sale under State Sales Tax Acts, affirming Mohd. Ekram Khan & Sons v. CTT.

tax appeal_allowed Significant sales tax warranty replacement credit note sale of goods

M/S. TATA MOTORS LTD. v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES

· K.M. Joseph; B.V. Nagarathna; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that replacement of defective automobile parts under warranty with manufacturer-issued credit notes to dealers constitutes a taxable sale under State Sales Tax Acts, affirming Mohd. Ekram Khan and overruling contrary High Court decisions.

tax appeal_allowed Significant sales tax warranty replacement credit notes sale of goods

Alpha G184 Owners Association v. Magnum International Trading Company Pvt. Ltd.

· J.K. Maheshwari; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that joint consumer complaints by multiple allottees are maintainable despite pendency of registration challenges, directing the National Commission to proceed expeditiously on merits.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 joint complaint pecuniary jurisdiction

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. v. M/S. SATHYANARAYANA SERVICE STATION

· K.M. Joseph; B.V Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld the arbitration award validating termination of a petrol pump dealership by notice, rejected the withdrawal of resignation, and set aside the High Court's order restoring the dealership.

civil appeal_allowed Significant dealership agreement termination by notice arbitration award Section 34 Arbitration Act

Kanimozhi Karunanidhi v. A. Santhana Kumar & Ors.

· Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court dismissed an election petition for failure to plead material facts showing how alleged non-disclosure of spouse's income tax details materially affected the election result, emphasizing strict compliance with pleading requirements under the Representation of the People Act.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Election Petition Representation of the People Act, 1951 Section 83(1)(a) Material Facts

Union of India v. Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP

· M. R. Shah
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the validity and maintainability of Section 140(5) petitions to remove fraudulent auditors and impose a five-year ban, restoring SFIO's criminal proceedings and overruling the High Court's contrary order.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act 2013 Section 140(5) Auditor removal Fraudulent conduct

Lilpa Naik v. Varun Srilanvasan

· 2023 INSC 468

The Supreme Court held that while the six-month waiting period for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act is generally mandatory, it may be waived in exceptional cases under Article 142 to grant complete justice.

family appeal_allowed Significant Article 142 Constitution of India Section 13-B Hindu Marriage Act Divorce by mutual consent Six-month waiting period

Hem Raj v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

· B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2023 INSC 644
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that an insurer must indemnify the insured for undisputed medical expenses incurred for third-party treatment under a valid vehicle insurance policy and allowed the appeal directing payment with interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance indemnification medical expenses consumer protection third-party insurance claim

Yogendra Prasad Singh v. Ram Bachan Devi

· Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 658

The Supreme Court held that a registered Sale Deed with recitals of transfer of title and possession operates as an absolute sale unless the local practice of ta khubzul badlain applies, invalidating the unilateral cancellation and upholding the plaintiff's ownership.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Sale Deed Transfer of Property Act, 1882 ta khubzul badlain title transfer

Bheem Rao Baswant Rao Patil v. K. Madan Mohan Rao & Ors.

· S. Ravindra Bhat; Arvind Kumar

The Supreme Court upheld the necessity of full disclosure of criminal antecedents by election candidates under Section 33A of the Representation of the People Act and ruled that election petitions disclosing valid causes cannot be dismissed at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Representation of the People Act, 1951 Section 33A disclosure Election petition Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Madan Prasad v. Union of India & Ors.

· Vihma Kohli; Ramesh Vimbdal

The court upheld the dismissal of a soldier for unauthorized absence beyond sanctioned leave, affirming the Summary Court Martial's authority and the proportionality of the punishment under the Army Act, 1950.

military_law appeal_dismissed Significant Army Act 1950 Section 39(b) unauthorized absence Summary Court Martial

Uttar Pradesh State v. Sonu Kushwaha

· Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court upheld the mandatory minimum 10-year sentence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child below 12 years, reversing the High Court's reduction of conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act 2012 Section 6 POCSO Aggravated penetrative sexual assault Minimum sentence

District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan v. Manveer Singh and Others

· Sanjiv Khanna; S.V.N. Bhatti

The Supreme Court held that unauthorized construction of a new Panchayat building on a school playground without sanction is illegal, directed disciplinary action against officials, and ordered remedial measures preserving the playground's use.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Gram Panchayat illegal construction playground public amenities

Asma Shaw v. The Islamia College of Science & Commerce Srinagar Kashmir & Ors.

· Abhay S. Oka; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2023 INSC 690

The Supreme Court held that an employee appointed on a substantive tenure basis is entitled to pay protection under Article 77-D of Jammu & Kashmir Civil Service Regulations when appointed to another government service, setting aside the High Court Division Bench's contrary decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pay protection Article 77-D Jammu & Kashmir Civil Service Regulations tenure post