Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

M/s Eminent Colonizers Private Limited v. Rajasthan Housing Board

04 Feb 2026 · J.B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 116

The Supreme Court held that under the pre-2015 Arbitration Act regime, the Section 11 court's order appointing an arbitrator conclusively decides the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement, barring parties from disputing it later, and set aside lower courts' orders invalidating awards on that ground.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment Arbitration agreement validity Clause 23 contract interpretation

U.P. Junior High School Council Instructor Welfare Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

04 Feb 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2026 INSC 117
Cites 0 · Cited by 17

The Supreme Court held that part time contractual instructors in Uttar Pradesh are entitled to periodic revision of honorarium, directed payment of Rs.17,000/- per month from 2017-18 onwards, and ruled that reduction of sanctioned honorarium amounts to prohibited forced labor.

labor appeal_allowed Significant part time contractual teachers honorarium revision Right to Education Act Project Approval Board

Pramod Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh

04 Feb 2026 · Rajesh Bindal; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 120
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that further investigation after submission of a final report under Section 173(2) CrPC requires prior judicial permission, and police or executive authorities cannot unilaterally order such investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 173(8) CrPC Further investigation Closure report Judicial permission

Sushil Kamalnayan Bharuka & Others v. State of Maharashtra & Others

03 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 168

The Supreme Court held that cancellation of an auction in favor of the highest bidder without material irregularity is unjustified and set aside the cancellation, directing allotment and sale deed execution consistent with prior High Court rulings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant auction cancellation highest bidder public auction judicial consistency

C. Velusamy v. K Indhera

03 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 112
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that courts can extend the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A even after an award is rendered post expiry of the statutory period, ensuring arbitration proceedings reach a conclusive award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 29A Arbitration and Conciliation Act extension of arbitrator mandate arbitral award validity arbitration timelines

SANDEEP SINGH BORA v. NARENDRA SINGH DEOPA

02 Feb 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 105

The Supreme Court held that courts cannot interfere in Panchayat election disputes except through election petitions as prescribed by law, setting aside the High Court's interim order allowing a disqualified candidate to contest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 243-O Panchayat elections Election petition Judicial review

The State of Tamil Nadu v. The State of Karnataka & Anr.

02 Feb 2026 · Vikram Nath; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 113
Cites 0 · Cited by 20

The Supreme Court directed the Central Government to constitute a Tribunal for adjudication of the Pennaiyar River water dispute after failed negotiations between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.

constitutional other Significant Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 Article 131 Constitution of India Pennaiyar River water dispute Water Disputes Tribunal

Rajia Begum v. Barnali Mukherjee

02 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 106

The Supreme Court held that disputes involving serious allegations of forgery of the arbitration agreement itself are non-arbitrable and must be adjudicated by courts before compelling arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement forgery fraud non-arbitrability

Yatendra Singh v. State of U.P. & Another

30 Jan 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 109

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and restored a complaint dismissed for default under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing the interest of justice over procedural default.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint dismissed for default restoration of complaint interest of justice

Kumar Bajaj v. Union of India

30 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 101

The Supreme Court set aside a biased selection committee's rejection of a candidate's appointment to ITAT, directing a fresh impartial selection process and condemning mala fide departmental actions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reasonable apprehension of bias natural justice compulsory retirement mala fide exercise of power

Bhola Nath v. The State of Jharkhand

30 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 99
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that long-serving contractual employees engaged after due selection are entitled to regularization, and the State's arbitrary refusal violates Article 14, directing immediate regularization.

labor appeal_allowed Significant contractual employment regularization Article 14 model employer

Rhythm County v. Satish Sanjay Hegde & Ors.

30 Jan 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 102

The Supreme Court upheld the NGT's authority to impose and quantify environmental compensation based on project cost and expert inputs, dismissing appeals challenging compensation orders against two real estate developers for environmental violations.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant Environmental Compensation National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 Polluter Pays Principle Environmental Clearance

Doniyar Vildanov v. The State of U.P.

30 Jan 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 95

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a narcotics case due to procedural lapses and discrepancies in prosecution evidence undermining lawful search and seizure.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act search and seizure consent letter reasonable doubt

YASH CHARITABLE TRUST v. UNION OF INDIA

30 Jan 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 96
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that stem cell therapy for Autism Spectrum Disorder cannot be offered as routine treatment outside approved clinical trials, emphasizing medical practitioners' duty of care and regulatory compliance.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant stem cell therapy Autism Spectrum Disorder New Drugs and Clinical Trial Rules, 2019 Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940

Usman Ali v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another

30 Jan 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2026 INSC 98

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's grant of bail to an accused in a murder case, holding that cancellation of bail requires exceptional circumstances which were absent here.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail cancellation of bail dying declaration pre-trial incarceration

Dr. S. Mohan v. Secretary to the Chancellor, Puducherry Technological University

30 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 100

The Supreme Court held that the Puducherry Technological University Act's provisions on Vice-Chancellor appointment violated mandatory UGC Regulations under exclusive Central legislative competence, invalidated the appointment but allowed the incumbent to complete his tenure to avoid disruption.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Puducherry Technological University Act, 2019 University Grants Commission Regulations, 2018 Search-cum-Selection Committee Vice-Chancellor appointment

M/S SAISUDHIR ENERGY LTD v. M/S NTPC VIDYUT VYAPAR NIGAM LTD

30 Jan 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 103
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court held that in public utility contracts, liquidated damages can be awarded without proof of actual loss and limited judicial modification of arbitral awards is permissible, restoring the Single Judge's award of reasonable compensation for delay in commissioning a solar power project.

civil appeal_allowed Significant liquidated damages public utility contract arbitration award modification Section 34 Arbitration Act

Monty Goyal v. Navrang Singh

29 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 94

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the disciplinary order against an advocate where the complainant had withdrawn the complaint by affidavit and no evidence was led to prove professional misconduct.

professional_misconduct / administrative appeal_allowed Significant professional misconduct advocates act disciplinary proceedings withdrawal of complaint

Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule & Ors.

29 Jan 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 92
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that applications for extension of arbitral award time under Section 29A lie before the Civil Court or High Court as defined in Section 2(1)(e), not before the High Court exercising jurisdiction under Section 11 for appointment of arbitrators.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A Section 11 Court definition

K.M. Shaji v. M. V. Nikesh Kumar

29 Jan 2026 · B.V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 111

The Supreme Court held that only the President of India can disqualify a candidate found guilty of corrupt practices under the RP Act, setting aside the High Court's order of disqualification while upholding the setting aside of the election.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Representation of the People Act, 1951 corrupt practices disqualification Section 8A