Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Tapas Kumar Das v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

· Dipankar Datta; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 225

The Supreme Court held that an LPG distributorship applicant's land located within the advertised block area satisfies eligibility when the advertisement does not explicitly restrict location to a specific mouza or Gram Panchayat, allowing the appeal and restoring the Single Judge's order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant LPG distributorship advertisement interpretation location eligibility Rurban Vitrak

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd.

· Aniruddha Bose; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 213

The Supreme Court dismissed a miscellaneous application seeking Late Payment Surcharge after final disposal of appeals, holding such applications impermissible to modify a final judgment without review or curative petition.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Late Payment Surcharge Power Purchase Agreement Electricity Act 2003 Change in Law

Satyanand Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

· Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 236
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of an Indian Army Havaldar wrongfully diagnosed with AIDS and discharged, directing pension and substantial compensation for the resultant harm.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant HIV diagnosis AIDS misdiagnosis Army Rules 1954 Invaliding Medical Board

Kumar @ Shiva Kumar v. State of Karnataka

· Bela M. Trivedi; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 156
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide due to lack of proximate instigation, contradictions in evidence, and failure to complete the evidentiary chain in a poisoning death case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC Abetment of suicide Instigation Contradictory evidence

District Appropriate Authority under the PNDT Act and Chief District Health Officer v. Jashmina Dilip Devda & Anr.

· J.K. Maheshwari; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 173

The Supreme Court held that suspension of registration under Section 20(3) of the PC&PNDT Act requires recorded reasons of public interest and cannot be exercised without notice and hearing under Sections 20(1) & (2), dismissing the appeal against suspension orders lacking such compliance.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant PC&PNDT Act Section 20 suspension public interest appropriate authority powers

Parteek Bansal v. State of Rajasthan

· Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 324

The Supreme Court quashed a second FIR lodged on the same allegations as a prior FIR after acquittal, holding it an abuse of process and imposed costs on the complainant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR abuse of process Section 482 CrPC multiple FIRs

State of Kerala v. Union of India

· Surya Kant; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 253

The Supreme Court dismissed Kerala's interim plea against Union-imposed borrowing limits, holding that the Union can regulate State borrowings under Article 293 and referred key constitutional questions to a larger Bench.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 293 Constitution State borrowing Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act Interim injunction

Level 9 Biz Pvt. Ltd. v. Himachal Pradesh Housing and Urban Development Authority

· Bela M. Trivedi; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 257

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court order permitting revival of a cancelled tender tainted by irregularities, holding that such revival without due process and opportunity to aggrieved parties is impermissible and amounts to misuse of court process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant tender cancellation Letter of Intent public procurement irregularities in tender

M/S RAJCO STEEL ENTERPRISES v. KAVITA SARAFF

· Aniruddha Bose; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 288

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a cheque dishonour case, holding that the petitioner failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt and the accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Presumption under Section 139 Legally enforceable debt

Union of India v. Barakathullah

· Bela M. Trivedi; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 452
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for PFI members charged under UAPA, holding that prima facie material justified denial of bail under Section 43D(5) of UAPA.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant UAPA Section 43D(5) bail prima facie case

Delhi Development Authority v. Tejpal

· 2024 INSC 456

The Supreme Court granted leave in multiple appeals by Delhi government entities challenging High Court orders declaring land acquisition proceedings lapsed, setting out principles for condonation of delay including fraud discovery, change of law, bureaucratic delay, and COVID-19 impact.

civil appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Limitation Act, 1963

Government of NCT of Delhi v. M/S BSK Realtors LLP

· 2024 INSC 455

The Supreme Court held that res judicata and merger doctrines do not bar fresh appeals challenging land acquisition lapses under the revised test in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal, emphasizing public interest and invoking Article 142 to harmonize conflicting precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition section 24(2) 2013 Act doctrine of merger res judicata

RAM BALAK SINGH v. STATE OF BIHAR

· Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 360

The Supreme Court held that a civil suit for declaration of rights based on a final order of the Consolidation Authority is not barred by Section 37 of the Bihar Consolidation Act and restored the trial court's decree recognizing the appellant's title and possession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Bihar Consolidation Act Section 37 Consolidation Act Consolidation Officer order Civil Court jurisdiction

Balasaheb Keshawrao Bhapkar & Ors. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Ors.

· Surya Kant; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 525

The Supreme Court constituted a High-Powered Sale Committee to expedite auction and liquidation of attached assets of Sai Prasad Group companies and ordered interim bail for Petitioners, balancing investor protection and justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant SEBI asset liquidation High-Powered Sale Committee Article 142 Constitution

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Harnand Singh

· Surya Kant; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 509

The Supreme Court revised compensation for land acquired by NOIDA to INR 403 per sq. yd. applying the principle of guesstimation, allowed parity applications in the interest of justice, and clarified the limited precedential value of the Bir Singh judgment.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Compensation enhancement Section 23(1) Section 28A

Dharmendra Kumar @ Dhamma v. State of Madhya Pradesh

· Surya Kant; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 480
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder based on credible eyewitness testimony, admissible dying declaration recorded under Section 161 CrPC, and voluntary disclosure leading to weapon recovery, dismissing the appellant's challenge on contradictions and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 161 CrPC statement Section 27 Indian Evidence Act disclosure statement

Maitreyee Chakraborty v. Tripura University

· J.K. Maheshwari; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 616

The Supreme Court held that an appointee selected against a lien vacancy must be confirmed upon vacation of the lien and satisfactory performance, and quashed the university's arbitrary denial of confirmation, directing regularization of the appellant's service.

civil appeal_allowed Significant lien vacancy regularization legitimate expectation arbitrariness

Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India

· Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 604
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court allowed bail to the appellant under UAPA, holding that the prosecution failed to establish reasonable grounds for believing the accusations were prima facie true as required under Section 43D(5).

criminal appeal_allowed Significant UAPA bail prima facie case Section 43D(5)

R. SHAMA NAIK v. G. SRINIVASIAH

· J. B. PARDIWALA; R. MAHADEVAN · 2024 INSC 927
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of specific performance relief due to the plaintiff's failure to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act, 1963 agreement of sale

Kirpal Singh v. Government of India, New Delhi & Ors.

· Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 944

The Supreme Court held that Section 14 of the Limitation Act applies to Section 34 applications under the Arbitration Act, allowing exclusion of delay periods and thereby condoning the appellant's delayed filing to challenge an arbitral award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 14 Limitation Act Section 34 Arbitration Act Limitation period Arbitral award