Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Sunil Kumar v. State of U.P. & Anr.

· Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 INSC 668

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant arising from a trivial workplace altercation, holding that continuing such proceedings would amount to harassment and abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of chargesheet trivial offence harassment abuse of process

Paul Rubber Industries Private Limited v. Amit Chand Mitra & Anr.

· Aniruddha Bose; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that an unregistered lease deed for a term exceeding one year is inadmissible as evidence to determine lease duration and purpose, affirming that the tenancy was month-to-month requiring fifteen days' notice, and dismissed the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant unregistered lease deed Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Registration Act, 1908 lease for manufacturing purposes

Sweety Kumari v. State of Bihar and Others

· J. K. Maheshwari; K. V. Viswanathan

The Supreme Court held that non-production of original certificates at interview is not a mandatory ground for disqualification if true photocopies are submitted and directed the State to accommodate meritorious candidates by adjusting vacancies.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Bihar Judicial Service Examination character certificate production of original documents eligibility vs proof

Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd. v. The Assessing Officer, Trivandrum

· B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank not carrying on banking business as defined under the Banking Regulation Act is not a "co-operative bank" under Section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act and is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 80P Income Tax Act co-operative bank definition Banking Regulation Act 1949 NABARD Act 1981

Union of India v. Uzair Imran & Ors.

· Bela M. Trivedi; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 901

The Supreme Court held that exclusion of a candidate from appointment based on an executive order inconsistent with statutory recruitment rules is arbitrary and directed appointment with conditions, emphasizing fairness and non-arbitrariness in public employment selection.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment rules vocational stream administrative tribunals Article 14

Dr. Nirmal Singh Panesar v. Mrs. Paramjit Kaur Panesar

· Aniruddha Bose; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 SCC Online SC 544

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not an automatic ground for divorce under Article 142 and that the appellant failed to prove cruelty or desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Marriage Act 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) Section 13(1)(ib) Article 142 Constitution of India

C.I.T., DELHI v. BHARTI HEXACOM LTD

· B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2023 INSC 917

The Supreme Court held that the variable licence fee under the New Telecom Policy, 1999 is revenue expenditure deductible under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, while the one-time licence fee paid up to 31 July 1999 is capital expenditure amortisable under Section 35ABB.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant variable licence fee New Telecom Policy 1999 capital expenditure revenue expenditure

UNIBROS v. ALL INDIA RADIO

· S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 931
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s setting aside of an arbitral award for loss of profit due to lack of credible evidence, affirming that such awards must comply with the public policy of India under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant loss of profit Hudson’s formula arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration Act

Commissioner, Customs Central Excise and Service Tax, Patna v. M/s Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd.

· S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court upheld that IIT Patna and NIT Rourkela qualify as governmental authorities exempt from service tax on construction services, dismissing Revenue's appeals and affirming refund claims by the contractor.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant governmental authority service tax exemption Mega Service Tax Exemption Notification construction services

M/S. IFCI LIMITED v. SUTANU SINHA

· Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2023 INSC 1023

The Supreme Court held that compulsorily convertible debentures are equity instruments and not debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, dismissing the appellant's claim as a financial creditor.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Compulsorily Convertible Debentures Equity vs Debt Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 Financial Creditor

P. Kishore Kumar v. Vittal K. Patkar

· Bela M. Trivedi; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 1009
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that occupancy rights under the Mysore Inam Abolition Act cannot be established by revenue records contrary to the Commissioner’s order, and dismissed the plaintiff’s suit for title, restoring the first appellate court’s decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Mysore Inam Abolition Act 1954 occupancy rights revenue records mutation entries

Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka and Ors.

· B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2023 INSC 1008
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC can only be granted by courts having territorial jurisdiction over the FIR, allowing the appeal and setting aside the bail granted by a court outside such jurisdiction while recognizing limited transit anticipatory bail as interim relief.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC territorial jurisdiction transit anticipatory bail

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Jindal Steel & Power Limited

· B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2023 INSC 1053

The Supreme Court held that for deduction under Section 80 IA, the market value of electricity supplied by captive power plants is the rate charged by the State Electricity Board to industrial consumers, not the lower contracted rate for surplus power sold to the Board.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 80 IA Income Tax Act market value captive power generation electricity pricing

M/S MANGALAM PUBLICATIONS v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

· Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 53

The Supreme Court held that reassessment under Section 147 requires tangible material beyond mere change of opinion and that reopening is barred if the assessee has fully and truly disclosed all material facts within the limitation period.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 147 Section 148 Reassessment

Asma Lateef & Anr. v. Shabbir Ahmad & Ors.

· B. R. Gavai; Dipankar Datta; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 36
Cites 0 · Cited by 13

The Supreme Court held that a decree passed without jurisdiction under Rule 10 of Order VIII, CPC is a nullity and inexecutable, dismissing the appeal and upholding the High Court's order quashing execution proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Rule 10 Order VIII CPC Section 47 CPC jurisdiction nullity of decree

Shadakshari v. State of Karnataka

· Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 42
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that absence of sanction under Section 197 CrPC does not justify quashing a complaint against a public servant accused of fabricating documents unless the act is shown to be in discharge of official duty, and set aside the High Court's quashing order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 CrPC sanction to prosecute public servant fabrication of documents

State of NCT of Delhi v. Raj Kumar @ Lovepreet @ Lovely

· Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 11
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that lawful extensions of investigation under section 43D(2)(b) of UAPA with valid reasons preclude default bail under section 167(2) CrPC and set aside the High Court's grant of default bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant default bail section 167(2) CrPC section 43D(2)(b) UAPA investigation extension

Dr. Mrs. Suman v. Marwadi Sammelan through its Secretary and Others

· J.K. Maheshwari; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 127

The Supreme Court held that a prospective resignation can be withdrawn before its effective date unless accepted with prior consent, and directed regularization of service for pension benefits accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant prospective resignation withdrawal of resignation locus poenitentiae unilateral acceptance

Anun Dhawan v. Union of India

· Bela M. Trivedi; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 136

The Supreme Court held that existing statutory schemes under the National Food Security Act adequately ensure food security and declined to direct implementation of Community Kitchens, emphasizing limited judicial review over policy matters.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Right to food Article 21 National Food Security Act, 2013 Community Kitchens

Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India

· Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud · 2024 INSC 113
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that anonymous and unlimited corporate political funding under the Electoral Bond Scheme violates constitutional principles of transparency and equality, striking down key provisions of the Finance Act 2017.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Electoral Bond Scheme political funding right to information Article 19(1)(a)