Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Dinesh Kumar v. The State of Haryana and Ors.

17 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 163
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that allotments of housing flats by a government employees' welfare society must comply with eligibility criteria and principles of fairness, setting aside arbitrary preferential allotments and directing a fresh draw.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Societies Registration Act, 1860 Article 226 jurisdiction Preferential allotment Fiduciary duty

Parameshwari v. State of Tamil Nadu

17 Feb 2026 · Rajesh Bindal; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 164
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's reduction of sentence in a grievous injury case, affirming that compensation cannot substitute appropriate punishment and sentencing must be proportionate to the gravity of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sentence reduction proportionality in sentencing compensation to victim Section 307 IPC

Rohit Jangde v. The State of Chhattisgarh

17 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 162
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction of a stepfather for his stepdaughter's murder due to flawed investigation, inadmissible Section 27 statement, incomplete DNA evidence, and failure to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 27 Indian Evidence Act last seen together theory DNA evidence

Gudipalli Siddhartha Reddy v. State C.B.I.

17 Feb 2026 · Rajesh Bindal; Manmohan · 2026 INSC 160

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for abetment of suicide and attempt to commit suicide, ruling death was due to poisoning and rejecting claims of manual strangulation or sexual assault.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant abetment of suicide organophosphate poisoning postmortem report manual strangulation

P. Suresh v. D. Kalaivani & Ors.

16 Feb 2026 · Aravind Kumar; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 121

The Supreme Court held that the High Court cannot exercise its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to strike off a plaint when a specific remedy under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is available, and set aside the High Court's order striking the plaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order VI Rule 16 CPC supervisory jurisdiction

Tiruchirappalli District Cricket Association v. Anna Nagar Cricket Club

13 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 154

The Supreme Court held that governance reforms mandated in S. Nithya do not apply to district cricket associations governed by BCCI norms, clarifying the limited scope of judicial intervention in sports administration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Sports governance District cricket association BCCI Constitution S. Nithya directions

Pawan Kumar v. Union of India

13 Feb 2026 · J. K. Maheshwari; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 156
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed regularization of casual workers in the Income Tax Department who rendered continuous service, emphasizing fairness over strict adherence to Umadevi's ten-year criterion.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization of casual workers continuous service Umadevi judgment irregular vs illegal appointment

Manoj v. State of Maharashtra; Prakash v. State of Maharashtra

13 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 152
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court set aside convictions under the Essential Commodities Act for possession of cement, holding that statutory control over cement was withdrawn before the alleged offence, rendering the prosecution unsustainable.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Cement Control Order, 1967 Statutory decontrol Section 3 and Section 7 E.C. Act

Balmukund Singh Gautam v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.

13 Feb 2026 · J.B. Pardiwala; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 157

The Supreme Court set aside anticipatory bail granted to an absconding accused, holding that such relief is generally not available to fugitives and acquittal of co-accused does not entitle bail on parity grounds.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail absconding accused Section 438 CrPC proclaimed offender

Harbinder Singh Sekhon & Ors. v. The State of Punjab & Ors.

13 Feb 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 159
Cites 0 · Cited by 40

The Supreme Court held that a Change of Land Use contrary to the operative Master Plan is illegal and cannot be retrospectively validated by administrative approvals, quashing the CLU and related environmental permissions granted for a cement grinding unit in Punjab.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Change of Land Use Master Plan Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 Environmental clearance

State Bank of India v. Union of India

13 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 153

The Supreme Court held that spectrum is a natural resource owned by the Government and while spectrum usage rights are intangible assets subject to insolvency, Government dues cannot be wiped off and spectrum transfer requires prior governmental approval.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Spectrum ownership Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Telecom licences Operational debt

R. SAVITHRI NAIDU v. M/S THE COTTON CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED

12 Feb 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 150
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a purchaser acquiring property after institution of arbitration proceedings and passing of an arbitral award is a transferee pendente lite barred from resisting execution, dismissing the appeal challenging attachment of the property for realisation of the award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant transferee pendente lite Order XXI Rule 102 CPC arbitral award enforcement lis pendens

Union of India v. SGT Girish Kumar

12 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 149

The Supreme Court held that arrears of disability pension, once judicially affirmed, cannot be restricted by limitation or delay and must be paid from the date they became due, dismissing the Union of India's appeals.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension broad banding arrears limitation

B. PRASHANTH HEGDE v. STATE BANK OF INDIA

12 Feb 2026 · P. S. Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2026 INSC 155
Cites 0 · Cited by 20

The Supreme Court upheld the admission of a Section 7 IBC application as within limitation, holding that debt acknowledgments through restructuring agreements and balance sheets restart the limitation period and minor procedural omissions do not warrant rejection.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Section 7 IBC limitation period acknowledgment of debt Section 18 Limitation Act

Hemlata Eknath Pise v. Shubham Bahu-uddeshiya Sanstha Waddhamna

11 Feb 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2026 INSC 147

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's partial remand order and directed a comprehensive reconsideration of all issues in the disciplinary dismissal case, emphasizing the need to decide all points with reasons.

civil appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings principles of natural justice remand reinstatement

Zeba Khan v. State of U.P. & Others

11 Feb 2026 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 144
Cites 1 · Cited by 33

The Supreme Court set aside bail granted to an accused involved in a forged law degree racket, emphasizing strict judicial scrutiny of bail orders and rejecting transfer of investigation absent exceptional circumstances.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail forgery criminal antecedents fabricated degrees

N. MANOHARAN v. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

11 Feb 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 143

The Supreme Court held that employees of the Heavy Water Plant, Department of Atomic Energy, are excluded from the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, as they are Central Government employees governed by CCS Pension Rules.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Heavy Water Plant Department of Atomic Energy

HERO CYCLES LIMITED & ANOTHER v. HERO ECOTECH LIMITED & OTHERS

10 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 169

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court and trial court orders for improper adjudication under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC and restored the application for fresh trial ensuring procedural fairness.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC Section 151 CPC Article 227 Constitution Contempt proceedings

Abdul Khalek & Others v. The State of Assam & Others

10 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 140

The Supreme Court upheld the State’s constitutional duty to remove unauthorized encroachments from reserved forests while mandating fair procedural safeguards including notice, hearing, and speaking orders before eviction.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant reserved forest unauthorized encroachment environmental protection constitutional obligation

J. Muthurajan & Anr. v. S. Vaikundarajan & Ors.

10 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 139
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a suit challenging a partition deed and a purported conciliation award on grounds of fraud and coercion discloses a prima facie cause of action and cannot be dismissed at the threshold, restoring the suit for trial alongside execution objections.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Partition Deed Conciliation Award Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Order VII Rule 11 CPC