UNKNOWN COURT
476 judgments
ce004830a0ec40c2b6fb7c96112839f7ca976178eccec6e8706a1931486fde06
The court clarified the legal framework for land revenue and stamp duty assessments under Uttar Pradesh laws, emphasizing strict statutory compliance and procedural correctness, and partially allowed the appeal accordingly.
4640aca080c7ba20e36ccdf061b92b779b0be73e31b93144f881457eb9b13b6e
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of government notifications and revenue recovery actions under Uttar Pradesh land reform laws, emphasizing procedural compliance and stamp duty requirements while rejecting respondents' claims inconsistent with the statutes.
556ac25e978b14e73c5a1c575c8e820102e656c5ea75311807c9d6f01023fedd
The court dismissed the petition, holding that the respondent's actions complied with legal and procedural requirements, and the petitioner failed to prove any violation of rights.
f77bce7e22276823014f1acdaba5e3d6d8ffc276166ff90b836f3f39c2c05918
The court upheld the validity of land acquisition under Section 3 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1982, affirming procedural compliance and adequacy of compensation, while limiting judicial interference to statutory safeguards.
34730742b144ec4bb3d8c17e9f2a715c73ad0476669be170b31bac0ff12a322a
The court upheld the validity of land acquisition proceedings and compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Acts, emphasizing strict procedural compliance and fair compensation.
7b92e68269213c4477feed365553d9c53070d0402a72e35bd16cc86fb07c759a
The judgment clarifies that only the English version of the judgment is authoritative and enforceable, while the vernacular translation is for the litigant's understanding only.
15829d990abc375bf6f919834a3cb5d1a8a5a0e2c3580059771485eacac8c4ac
The judgment text provided is a disclaimer stating that only the English version of the judgment is authoritative and the vernacular translation is for litigant understanding only.
6094e5c432a966ee4613c17e487f6ed01ca580193df177d5065b828bb8e71016
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 304 IPC, affirming that the petitioner’s gross negligence in driving caused fatal accidents, warranting criminal liability.
421fc695e015ea8bf1e959aaef2afe744e70fe4d85957ddaf2fc9f5141fa8f14
The court upheld the conviction under Section 304 IPC for rash and negligent driving causing death, affirming that the accused's conduct was the proximate cause of the fatal accident.
73c79cb64fd96f1b3a6f8b8f719033db60bf74019e9615a43168e379c73ee76f
The High Court upheld the tax assessment and penalty orders under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1971, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the validity and correctness of the tax demands.
d85823db1e66457414a42408ddccce586e20a8ef9a5494d87558976c218522d5
The court upheld the conviction of the accused for murder under Section 302 IPC, rejecting the defense of self-defense and affirming the sufficiency of prosecution evidence.
cd4aeed02ded4685bafbbd11a5d3c13a40b5bce01d80e445648c66f3d12e7ef0
The court upheld the High Court’s dismissal of the petition to quash the FIR and criminal proceedings, affirming that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC are to be exercised sparingly and only in cases of manifest illegality.
59880055ef35c819ea06aa1231a5ffa280d923168e282a7cf71532370096cb1c
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the petitioner, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and no procedural irregularities vitiated the trial.
b2b29d2a913afd91948a10f5ff40253500808319669d9f33210021576bb6caa1
The court upheld the criminal convictions of the accused, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through credible evidence and a fair trial.
1b84e3b2dc84683efd4652aa4757cc5cee4d3eae972436ac02c854075ad16723
The High Court upheld the murder and cruelty convictions under Sections 302 and 498A IPC, affirming that a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and corroborative medical testimony sufficed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
7868546f1f88b976d962a3032514e25dbc16952bc22757e603f163595da062b4
The court directed authorities to implement statutory financial adjustments and benefits for 2013-17, affirming writ jurisdiction to enforce compliance and prevent arbitrary administrative action.
f1aa67b0df990af44eb4b4a59047e8c57d29c928d0435c0d321b757e326dc9f9
The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's appeal, upholding the conviction and sentence based on sufficient evidence and proper application of law.
57caca56007b6459770d84b615ca286356ed0d8e05f966ee6f483c64d1a15a33
The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence under Sections 406, 420, and 506(ii) IPC, affirming that the prosecution proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt.