Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

Ravi Sharma v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

11 Jul 2022 · Abhay S. Oka; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal, holding that the High Court erred in reversing it without disproving the trial court's plausible view on circumstantial evidence and motive.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 378 CrPC circumstantial evidence motive

Ravi Sharma v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

11 Jul 2022 · Abhay S. Oka; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal, holding that the High Court erred in reversing a plausible acquittal in a circumstantial evidence case lacking a complete chain and firm motive.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 378 CrPC circumstantial evidence motive

Gregory Patrao and Ors. v. Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited & Ors.

11 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that a post-acquisition allottee company under the KIAD Act is not a 'person interested' entitled to participate in compensation proceedings, restoring the Reference Court’s award and setting aside the High Court’s order allowing such participation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 post-acquisition allottee person interested land acquisition

Biju K.K. v. Cochin University of Science and Technology

11 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that courts must examine on merits challenges to Selection Committee decisions on experience and eligibility, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant judicial review selection committee eligibility criteria experience marks

Biju K.K. v. Cochin University of Science and Technology

11 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court remanded a service selection dispute for fresh judicial scrutiny of experience marks and eligibility criteria, emphasizing courts must examine such challenges on merits rather than defer to selection committees.

civil appeal_allowed Significant judicial review selection committee experience marks eligibility criteria

Asha Rani Gupta v. Sri Vineet Kumar

11 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that in eviction suits, a tenant must deposit admitted rent and monthly dues under Order XV Rule 5 CPC, and failure to do so justifies striking off defence despite denial of landlord-tenant relationship.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XV Rule 5 CPC striking off defence eviction suit rent deposit

ASHA RANI GUPTA v. SRI VINEET KUMAR

11 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that courts have discretionary power under Order XV Rule 5 CPC to strike off defence for non-payment of rent in eviction suits, and denial of landlord-tenant relationship does not exempt the tenant from depositing rent during litigation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XV Rule 5 CPC striking off defence eviction suit non-payment of rent

Talli Gram Panchayat v. Union of India

11 Jul 2022 · D. Y. Chandrachud; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that a single-member bench of the NGT is invalid under Section 4(4)(c) of the NGT Act, set aside its orders, and restored the appeal for fresh hearing before a properly constituted bench.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Green Tribunal Act 2010 Section 4(4)(c) environmental clearance single-member bench

Desh Raj & Ors. v. Rohtash Singh

11 Jul 2022 · Surya Kant; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that time was the essence of the contract, justified forfeiture of earnest money due to Respondent's failure to perform within stipulated time, and set aside the decree for refund of earnest money granted by lower courts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant time essence of contract forfeiture of earnest money specific performance Section 55 Indian Contract Act

Union Bank of India v. Rajat Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

11 Jul 2022 · Aniruddha Bose; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court dismissed the application seeking issuance of sale certificate after delayed payment beyond statutory timelines under SARFAESI Rules, holding such extensions impermissible and the application not maintainable.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Rule 9 sale certificate

Subhash Chander & Ors. v. M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

08 Jul 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that after expiry of the lease renewal under the Burmah Shell Act, respondents became statutory tenants under the Haryana Rent Act, barring Civil Court jurisdiction and permitting eviction only under the Rent Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant statutory tenancy lease renewal rent control act civil court jurisdiction

Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank v. Ramesh Chandra Meena

07 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that an employee facing departmental inquiry cannot be represented by a retired employee of the Bank as Defence Representative unless expressly permitted by binding service regulations, and set aside the High Court's order allowing such representation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry defence representative service regulation representation rights

Neilan International Co. Ltd v. Powerica Limited

06 Jul 2022 · J.K. MAHESHWARI

The Supreme Court held that territorial jurisdiction challenges in arbitration matters must be raised before the court where the petition is pending and dismissed the transfer petition seeking to move the Section 34 arbitration challenge from Bengaluru to Mumbai.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant transfer petition territorial jurisdiction Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 25 CPC

M/s. Martin & Harris Private Limited & Anr. v. Rajendra Mehta & Ors.

06 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari · 2022 INSC 663
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order fixing mesne profits at Rs. 2,50,000 per month, holding that the New Rajasthan Rent Control Act does not apply to eviction suits pending under the Old Act at its commencement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mesne profits Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 Section 32 savings

M/s. Martin & Harris Private Limited & Anr. v. Rajendra Mehta & Ors.

06 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that mesne profits in eviction suits pending under the repealed Rajasthan Premises Act must be governed by the old law, dismissing the appeal against the High Court's order fixing mesne profits at Rs. 2,50,000 per month.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mesne profits Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 Section 20

Abhimanyu Partap Singh v. Namita Sekhon & Another

06 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a claimant with 100% permanent disability from a motor vehicle accident, applying the multiplier method to ensure just and reasonable damages covering pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 permanent disability compensation

Karan Kapoor v. Madhuri Kumar

06 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 13

The Supreme Court set aside the decree passed on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in a landlord-tenant dispute involving Agreements to Sell, directing a full trial to adjudicate triable issues including rent arrears and ownership claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admission landlord-tenant relationship Agreement to Sell

SRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE AND INVESTMENT INDIA LTD. v. OMESH MISHRA MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST

06 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a bona fide purchaser from a decree holder who is in possession cannot file objections under Order XXI Rules 97 to 101 CPC in execution proceedings, affirming the finality of execution decrees and dismissing the appellant's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXI CPC execution proceedings bona fide purchaser decree holder

SRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE AND INVESTMENT INDIA LTD. v. OMESH MISHRA MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST

06 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a bona fide purchaser from a decree holder is not entitled to file objections under Order XXI Rules 97 to 101 CPC in execution proceedings and must seek remedy by a separate suit.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXI CPC execution proceedings bona fide purchaser purchaser pendente lite

Harpal Singh v. State of Punjab

05 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of Harpal Singh for murder and robbery based on credible eyewitness testimony, identification of recovered stolen articles, and corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed murder robbery criminal conspiracy recovery of stolen property