Supreme Court of India

17,536 judgments

Year:

DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD. v. AIRPORT ECONOMIC REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

11 Jul 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court upheld that Fuel Throughput Charges are aeronautical revenues subject to tariff regulation and affirmed the regulatory framework for tariff determination including the calculation of the Hypothetical Regulatory Asset Base.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Fuel Throughput Charges Aeronautical services Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act Tariff determination

DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD. v. AIRPORT ECONOMIC REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

11 Jul 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court upheld that Fuel Throughput Charges are aeronautical revenues subject to tariff regulation by AERA and affirmed the regulatory framework and tariff calculation methodology including the Hypothetical Regulatory Asset Base.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Fuel Throughput Charges Aeronautical services Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Tariff determination

Mohammad Irfan v. State of Karnataka

11 Jul 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Hemant Gupta; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of accused persons for conspiracy to wage war against the Government of India and terrorist activities linked to Lashkar-e-Toiba, affirming the sufficiency of evidence including recoveries, confessions, and incriminating literature.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant conspiracy waging war against Government of India Lashkar-e-Toiba terrorist activities

Mohammad Irfan v. State of Karnataka

11 Jul 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Hemant Gupta; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld convictions of accused for conspiring to wage war against India and engaging in terrorist activities based on recovered arms, literature, confessions, and documentary evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant conspiracy waging war against Government of India terrorist activities Lashkar-e-Toiba

R.M. Sundaram v. Sri Kayarohanasamy and Neelayadhakshi Amman Temple

11 Jul 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court upheld the specific endowment of 26 jewellery items to a temple deity, dismissing the appellant's ownership claim and affirming the temple's right to possession and use during religious festivals.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific endowment religious endowment Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Kudavarai

Nanda Dulal Pradhan & Anr. v. Dibakar Pradhan & Anr.

11 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that defendants who failed to file a written statement cannot file it after setting aside an ex-parte decree but may participate in trial proceedings, restoring the First Appellate Court's order and setting aside the High Court's judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte decree setting aside ex-parte decree written statement Order IX Rule 13 CPC

Nanda Dulal Pradhan & Anr. v. Dibakar Pradhan & Anr.

11 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that defendants who failed to file a written statement may still participate in suit proceedings after setting aside an ex-parte decree, restoring the First Appellate Court’s order and setting aside the High Court’s contrary decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte decree setting aside ex-parte judgment written statement Order IX Rule 13 CPC

Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Sunil Krishna Khaitan and Others

11 Jul 2022 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court clarified that Regulation 10 of the SEBI Takeover Regulations applies only when combined shareholding of an acquirer and persons acting in concert crosses 15% from below, upholding the Securities Appellate Tribunal's interpretation and limiting SEBI's directions accordingly.

administrative appeal_partly_allowed Significant SEBI Takeover Regulations 1997 Regulation 10 Regulation 11(1)

Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Sunil Krishna Khaitan and Others

11 Jul 2022 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court clarified that under SEBI Takeover Regulations, the obligation to make a public announcement arises only when combined shareholding of an acquirer and persons acting in concert crosses 15%, and the Securities Appellate Tribunal cannot substitute directions for open offers with monetary penalties.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant SEBI Takeover Regulations 1997 Regulation 10 interpretation persons acting in concert public announcement obligation

Utpal Trehan v. DLF Home Developers Ltd

11 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that the allottee is not liable to pay maintenance charges to the builder absent a claim by the maintenance agency and restored the builder’s liability to pay delayed possession compensation from the date of booking until a valid offer of possession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Apartment Buyers Agreement Delayed possession compensation Maintenance charges Consumer dispute

Utpal Trehan v. DLF Home Developers Ltd

11 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that the builder must pay delayed possession compensation from the date of booking until fresh offer of possession and set aside directions requiring the allottee to pay maintenance charges absent a valid claim by the association.

civil appeal_allowed Significant delayed possession compensation maintenance charges Apartment Buyers’ Agreement Timely Payment Rebate

HCMI Education v. Narendra Pal Singh

11 Jul 2022 · Abhay S. Oka; M. M. Sundresh
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an admission facilitator cannot be held liable for a foreign government's policy abolishing an academic program, setting aside consumer forum orders against the facilitator.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant consumer protection foreign educational institution authorized representative abolition of MBBS program

HCMI Education v. Narendra Pal Singh

11 Jul 2022 · Abhay S. Oka; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that a facilitator securing admission to a foreign medical college is not liable for the foreign government's policy abolishing the MBBS program, dismissing the consumer complaint against the facilitator.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant consumer protection foreign educational institution facilitator liability policy decision

Perry Kansagra v. Smriti Madan Kansagra

11 Jul 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

The Supreme Court held Perry Kansagra guilty of contempt for violating solemn undertakings and court orders in a child custody dispute, recalled prior custody orders, and directed enforcement measures to secure the child's custody and presence.

family contempt_proceedings_initiated Significant contempt of court child custody mirror order fraud on court

Perry Kansagra v. Smriti Madan Kansagra

11 Jul 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

The Supreme Court held Perry Kansagra guilty of criminal contempt for violating solemn undertakings and court orders in a child custody dispute, recalled earlier custody orders, and initiated contempt proceedings while directing enforcement measures to secure the child's custody.

family contempt_proceedings_initiated Significant contempt of court child custody mirror order jurisdiction

State Bank of India and Ors. v. Dr. Vijay Mallya

11 Jul 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held Vijay Mallya guilty of criminal contempt for violating restraint orders by transferring US$ 40 million, imposed imprisonment and fine, declared the transactions void, and directed recovery of the funds to uphold the majesty of law.

criminal conviction_upheld Significant contempt of court restraint orders asset disclosure criminal contempt

State Bank of India and Ors. v. Dr. Vijay Mallya

11 Jul 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...

The Supreme Court held Dr. Vijay Mallya guilty of contempt for violating restraint orders and non-disclosure of assets, imposed imprisonment and fine, declared related transactions void, and directed recovery of funds to enforce decrees.

criminal conviction_upheld Significant contempt of court restraint orders asset disclosure purging contempt

State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. v. Akhil Sharda & Ors.

11 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashing of criminal proceedings under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, holding that serious allegations and interconnected FIRs require further investigation and trial without conducting a mini trial at the pre-trial stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings criminal breach of trust cheating

HSBC PI Holdings (Mauritius) Limited v. Pradeep Shantipershad Jain

11 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court held the respondents guilty of wilful contempt for disobeying orders to maintain USD 60 million in a bank account, affirming that non-compliance of Section 9 orders is punishable despite executability and lack of liquid funds is no defense.

civil other Significant contempt of court wilful disobedience Section 9 Arbitration Act foreign arbitral award enforcement

Delhi Development Authority v. Diwan Chand Anand & Ors.

11 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of DDA's appeal as abated for non-substitution of legal representatives of deceased respondents and remanded the matter for merits hearing after proper enquiry under Order 22 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Order 22 CPC abatement of appeal legal representatives substitution