Supreme Court of India

17,536 judgments

Year:

Union Bank of India v. Rajat Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

11 Jul 2022 · Aniruddha Bose; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court dismissed the application seeking issuance of sale certificate after delayed payment beyond statutory timelines under SARFAESI Rules, holding such extensions impermissible and the application not maintainable.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Rule 9 sale certificate

Subhash Chander & Ors. v. M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

08 Jul 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that after expiry of the lease renewal under the Burmah Shell Act, respondents became statutory tenants under the Haryana Rent Act, barring Civil Court jurisdiction and permitting eviction only under the Rent Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant statutory tenancy lease renewal rent control act civil court jurisdiction

Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank v. Ramesh Chandra Meena

07 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that an employee facing departmental inquiry cannot be represented by a retired employee of the Bank as Defence Representative unless expressly permitted by binding service regulations, and set aside the High Court's order allowing such representation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry defence representative service regulation representation rights

Neilan International Co. Ltd v. Powerica Limited

06 Jul 2022 · J.K. MAHESHWARI

The Supreme Court held that territorial jurisdiction challenges in arbitration matters must be raised before the court where the petition is pending and dismissed the transfer petition seeking to move the Section 34 arbitration challenge from Bengaluru to Mumbai.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant transfer petition territorial jurisdiction Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 25 CPC

M/s. Martin & Harris Private Limited & Anr. v. Rajendra Mehta & Ors.

06 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari · 2022 INSC 663
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order fixing mesne profits at Rs. 2,50,000 per month, holding that the New Rajasthan Rent Control Act does not apply to eviction suits pending under the Old Act at its commencement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mesne profits Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 Section 32 savings

M/s. Martin & Harris Private Limited & Anr. v. Rajendra Mehta & Ors.

06 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that mesne profits in eviction suits pending under the repealed Rajasthan Premises Act must be governed by the old law, dismissing the appeal against the High Court's order fixing mesne profits at Rs. 2,50,000 per month.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mesne profits Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 Section 20

Abhimanyu Partap Singh v. Namita Sekhon & Another

06 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a claimant with 100% permanent disability from a motor vehicle accident, applying the multiplier method to ensure just and reasonable damages covering pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 permanent disability compensation

Karan Kapoor v. Madhuri Kumar

06 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 13

The Supreme Court set aside the decree passed on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in a landlord-tenant dispute involving Agreements to Sell, directing a full trial to adjudicate triable issues including rent arrears and ownership claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admission landlord-tenant relationship Agreement to Sell

SRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE AND INVESTMENT INDIA LTD. v. OMESH MISHRA MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST

06 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a bona fide purchaser from a decree holder who is in possession cannot file objections under Order XXI Rules 97 to 101 CPC in execution proceedings, affirming the finality of execution decrees and dismissing the appellant's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXI CPC execution proceedings bona fide purchaser decree holder

SRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE AND INVESTMENT INDIA LTD. v. OMESH MISHRA MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST

06 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a bona fide purchaser from a decree holder is not entitled to file objections under Order XXI Rules 97 to 101 CPC in execution proceedings and must seek remedy by a separate suit.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXI CPC execution proceedings bona fide purchaser purchaser pendente lite

Harpal Singh v. State of Punjab

05 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of Harpal Singh for murder and robbery based on credible eyewitness testimony, identification of recovered stolen articles, and corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed murder robbery criminal conspiracy recovery of stolen property

M/S RAMNATH EXPORTS PVT. LTD. v. VINITA MEHTA & ANR.

05 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a High Court must decide an application seeking permission to file a single appeal against consolidated suits before dismissing the appeal on maintainability grounds, thereby protecting the appellant's right to be heard on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant consolidated suits single appeal res judicata Section 96 CPC

M/S RAMNATH EXPORTS PVT. LTD. v. VINITA MEHTA & ANR.

05 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a single appeal against two separate decrees passed in consolidated suits requires prior permission, and remanded the matter for such decision before dismissing the appeal on maintainability grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant consolidation of suits single appeal res judicata Section 96 CPC

Aman Sharma & Anr. v. Umesh & Ors.

05 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the ownership of Plaintiffs based on a duly proved Will, dismissed the appeal of Defendants who failed to prove title, and held that a sale deed by a non-owner cannot transfer title.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will Legal heir Possession Bona fide purchaser

Aman Sharma & Anr. v. Umesh & Ors.

05 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the ownership and possession rights of Plaintiffs based on valid Will and succession, dismissing the appeal of purchasers who acquired property from a person without title.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will Legal heir Possession Bona fide purchaser

Malkeet Singh Gill v. The State of Chhattisgarh

05 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for criminal breach of trust and cheating, affirming concurrent sentences and limiting revisional interference with concurrent factual findings.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 409 IPC Section 420 IPC criminal breach of trust cheating

K. Ramya v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.

30 Jun 2022 · Surya Kant; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored and enhanced compensation for motor accident death by holding that income tax returns and audit reports reliably reflect the deceased's income including business ventures, rejecting the High Court's notional income approach.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of income income tax returns

K. Ramya v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.

30 Jun 2022 · Surya Kant; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored enhanced compensation to the deceased's dependents by holding that income tax returns and audit reports reliably determine loss of income, including income from active business ventures, while allowing managerial skill compensation for income from capital assets under the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of income income tax returns

Manoj Parihar v. State of Jammu & Kashmir

27 Jun 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that seniority of judicial officers appointed by direct recruitment must be fixed strictly on merit and not roster points, dismissing the petition challenging the High Court's order to that effect.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant seniority fixation roster system reservation merit list

Manoj Parihar v. State of Jammu & Kashmir

27 Jun 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that seniority of judicial officers must be fixed strictly on merit and not on roster points, dismissing the petition challenging the High Court's order quashing roster-based seniority fixation.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant seniority fixation roster system reservation merit