Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Ghulam Hassan Beigh v. Mohammad Maqbool Magrey & Ors.

26 Jul 2022 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Abhay S. Oka; J.B. Pardiwala
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that discharge of accused from murder charge solely on post mortem report without full trial evidence is impermissible and remanded for fresh framing of charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant framing of charge discharge of accused Section 302 IPC culpable homicide

Sharda Associates v. United India Insurance Company Ltd

25 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that loss caused by a landslide is covered under the insurance policy and the insurer's repudiation under IMT 47 was unjustified, restoring the consumer commission's award in favor of the insured.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Insurance policy interpretation IMT 47 Tool of trade Overturning exclusion

Sharda Associates v. United India Insurance Company Ltd

25 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that the insurer's repudiation under IMT 47 was unjustified as the excavator's loss was due to a landslide, not overturning as a tool, and restored the consumer commission's award in favor of the insured.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Insurance policy interpretation IMT 47 Excavator as tool of trade Overturning exclusion

Union of India v. Mahendra Singh

25 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that strict compliance with the prescribed language requirement in recruitment applications and examination answer sheets is mandatory, and violation warrants rejection of candidature.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment procedure mandatory condition language requirement application form

Union of India v. Mahendra Singh

25 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a candidate's failure to use the same language in the application form and examination answer sheet, as mandated by recruitment rules, justifies rejection of candidature.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment procedure application form language requirement handwriting verification

Kanchan Kumari v. State of Bihar

25 Jul 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy · 2022 INSC 746

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot pass peremptory directions adversely affecting third parties without notice in anticipatory bail proceedings and set aside such a direction cancelling the appellant's Post Office agent licence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. third party rights natural justice

Kanchan Kumari v. The State of Bihar & Anr.

25 Jul 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that a court granting anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. cannot issue adverse directions against third parties without notice, and set aside the High Court's order cancelling the appellant's Post Office agent licence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 438 Cr.P.C. anticipatory bail third party rights natural justice

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd v. M/s IVRCL AMR JOINT VENTURE

25 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that clause 15 of the contract did not constitute a valid arbitration agreement, invalidating the High Court's appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement Section 11(6) Arbitration Act dispute resolution clause contract interpretation

Sumitha Pradeep v. Arun Kumar C.K

25 Jul 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's grant of anticipatory bail in a serious POCSO sexual assault case, emphasizing the primacy of prima facie evidence and statutory presumption over custodial interrogation considerations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail POCSO Act Section 29 POCSO sexual assault minor

Prabha Tyagi v. Kamlesh Devi

23 Jul 2022 · B.V. Nagarathna; M.R. Shah · 2022 INSC 563
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a woman who has at any time lived in a shared household with the respondent is entitled to protection under the Domestic Violence Act, and a Domestic Incident Report is not mandatory when the aggrieved person files an application directly.

family appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Domestic Incident Report Shared household Domestic relationship

General Manager East Coast Railway Rail Sadan & Anr. v. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.

22 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that under Section 42 of the Arbitration Act, only the court where the first application was filed has jurisdiction over subsequent arbitration applications, quashing the Orissa High Court's appointment of an arbitrator for lack of jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 42 jurisdiction Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator Section 9 interim relief

General Manager East Coast Railway Rail Sadan & Anr. v. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.

22 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that under Section 42 of the Arbitration Act, only the Court where the first application was filed has jurisdiction over subsequent arbitration applications, quashing the Orissa High Court's appointment of an arbitrator for lack of jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 42 jurisdiction Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator Section 9 interim relief

Hemant Kumar Verma & Ors. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors.

22 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that junior resident doctors serving under bond in ESIC institutions are not 'in-service' doctors eligible for reservation in postgraduate medical courses, dismissing their writ petition seeking such inclusion.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Employees State Insurance Corporation Junior Resident Doctors In-service doctors Reservation in postgraduate medical courses

Hemant Kumar Verma & Ors. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors.

22 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that junior resident doctors serving under bond in ESIC institutions are not 'in-service' doctors eligible for reservation in postgraduate medical courses reserved for permanent ESIC medical officers.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant junior resident doctors in-service doctors reservation postgraduate medical education

Narinder Singh v. Divesh Bhutani

21 Jul 2022 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Abhay S. Oka; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that lands notified under the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 and recorded as forest in government records are forest lands under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, requiring prior Central Government approval for non-forest use.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Indian Forest Act, 1927 forest land definition

Narinder Singh v. Divesh Bhutani

21 Jul 2022 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Abhay S. Oka; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that lands notified under Section 4 of the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 and recorded as forest in government records qualify as forest lands under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, requiring prior Central Government approval for non-forest use.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Indian Forest Act, 1927 forest land definition

The Khasgi (Devi Ahilyabai Holkar Charities) Trust, Indore v. Vipin Dhanaitkar

21 Jul 2022 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Abhay S. Oka; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld that the Khasgi Trust properties vested in the State Government and that unauthorized alienations by Trustees without prior sanction under the Public Trusts Act are void, dismissing the Trust's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Khasgi Trust Public Trusts Act, 1951 alienation of trust property Article XII Covenant

X v. The Principal Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department & Anr

21 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; A S Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that unmarried women are entitled to terminate pregnancy up to 24 weeks under the MTP Act, affirming reproductive autonomy and interpreting Rule 3B purposively to include them.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Rule 3B MTP Rules 2003 unmarried women reproductive autonomy

X v. The Principal Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department & Anr

21 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; A S Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that unmarried women are entitled to terminate pregnancy up to 24 weeks under the MTP Act, affirming reproductive rights as part of personal liberty under Article 21 and striking down exclusionary interpretation of Rule 3B.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Rule 3B MTP Rules 2003 unmarried women termination of pregnancy

R. KRSNA MURTII v. R. R. JAGADESAN

21 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Aniruddha Bose · 2022 INSC 741

The Supreme Court held that a legal heir and registered Will beneficiary is entitled to be substituted as legal representative of a deceased plaintiff without outright dismissal of the application for non-impleadment of other heirs, mandating procedural inquiry under Order XXII Rule 5 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant substitution of legal representative registered Will legal heir Order XXII Rule 5 CPC