Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Coal India Limited v. Competition Commission of India

15 Jun 2023 · K. M. Joseph; B. V. Nagarathna; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Competition Act, 2002 applies to Coal India Limited and its subsidiaries despite their statutory monopoly status under the repealed Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, dismissing their claim of immunity.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Competition Act, 2002 Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973 Abuse of dominant position Statutory monopoly

Coal India Limited v. Competition Commission of India

15 Jun 2023 · K. M. Joseph; B. V. Nagarathna; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the Competition Act, 2002 applies to Coal India Limited and its subsidiaries despite their statutory monopoly status under the Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973 and Article 39(b) of the Constitution, dismissing their appeal against findings of abuse of dominant position.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Competition Act, 2002 Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973 Abuse of dominant position Statutory monopoly

M/S TRINITY INFRAVENTURES LTD. & ORS. v. M.S. MURTHY & ORS.

15 Jun 2023 · V. Ramasubramanian; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 581

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree partitioning the Khurshid Jah Paigah estate among heirs post-abolition of Jagirs, affirming heirs' rights and execution against State and third parties.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Paigah estate Mathruka property Jagir Abolition Regulation 1949 partition suit

M/S TRINITY INFRAVENTURES LTD. v. M.S. MURTHY

15 Jun 2023 · V. Ramasubramanian; Pankaj Mithal

The Supreme Court upheld the divisibility of the Khurshid Jah Paigah estate post-Jagir abolition, validated heirs' shares and assignments, but mandated due process for possession delivery involving third-party possessors.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Paigah estate Jagir Abolition Mathruka property Partition of estate

Aish Mohammad v. State of Haryana & Ors.

14 Jun 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah

The Supreme Court upheld the State's authority to reconstruct adverse police service records and compulsorily retire an officer, clarifying the limits of review powers under the Punjab Police Rules, 1934.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Punjab Police Rules, 1934 Compulsory retirement Adverse remarks Annual Confidential Report

Aish Mohammad v. State of Haryana & Ors.

14 Jun 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah

The Supreme Court upheld the authority of the Director General of Police to reconstruct adverse service records and order compulsory retirement, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the expunction and retirement orders under the Punjab Police Rules, 1934.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Punjab Police Rules 1934 compulsory retirement adverse remarks Annual Confidential Report

Bar Council of India v. Rabi Sahu & Anr.

09 Jun 2023 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Kumar

The Supreme Court held that the Bar Council of India has statutory authority to require law degrees from recognized colleges for enrolment as Advocates, overruling prior inconsistent precedent and setting aside the High Court's order directing enrolment of a candidate from an unrecognized college.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Bar Council of India enrolment as Advocate Advocates Act 1961 law college recognition

State of Himachal Pradesh v. M/s OASYS Cybernatics Pvt. Ltd.

06 Jun 2023 · Surya Kant; Ujjal Bhuyan; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 1355
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court held that a conditional Letter of Intent does not create binding contractual rights and upheld the lawful cancellation of the LoI by the State, emphasizing limited judicial review over administrative tender decisions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Letter of Intent public procurement arbitrariness natural justice

Jitendra Nath Mishra v. State of U.P. & Anr

02 Jun 2023 · Dipankar Datta; Pankaj Mithal
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the summoning of the appellant under Section 319 CrPC based on prima facie evidence implicating him, dismissing the appeal against the order summoning him to face trial under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 CrPC Summoning order Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Delay in FIR

Ghanshyam v. Yogendra Rathi

02 Jun 2023 · Dipankar Datta; Pankaj Mithal

The Supreme Court upheld the plaintiff's possessory rights under an agreement to sell and dismissed the defendant's appeal against eviction and mesne profits, clarifying that power of attorney and will do not confer title without registered sale deed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant agreement to sell possession memo power of attorney will

Rohit Bishnoi v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

02 Jun 2023 · J. B. V. Nagarathna; J. Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2023 INSC 642

The Supreme Court set aside cryptic High Court bail orders in a serious murder case, emphasizing the necessity of recorded reasons and consideration of prima facie evidence before granting bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 302 IPC heinous crime prima facie evidence

ARTI DIXIT & ANR v. SUSHIL KUMAR MISHRA & ORS

01 Jun 2023 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that failure to furnish valid and enforceable security as mandated under Section 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act renders an application to set aside an ex-parte decree incompetent, dismissing the appeal and upholding the eviction decree.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 17 Provincial Small Cause Courts Act Order IX Rule 13 CPC ex-parte decree security for performance of decree

Yadaiah and Anr. v. State of Telangana and others

01 Jun 2023 · Surya Kant; J.K. Maheshwari · 2023 INSC 664

The Supreme Court upheld the resumption of government land assigned to Scheduled Castes, ruling that unauthorized alienation under the 1977 Act justified cancellation despite prior litigation and that res judicata did not bar fresh proceedings.

property appeal_dismissed Significant res judicata land assignment Special Laoni Rules Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax Bangalore and Anr.

01 Jun 2023 · Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan

The Supreme Court upheld the Settlement Commission's grant of immunity from penalty and prosecution under Section 245H(1) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing limited judicial interference in the Commission's discretionary orders based on full and true disclosure and cooperation.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Settlement Commission Section 245H immunity from prosecution income tax

Prakash Nishad @ Kewat Zinak Nishad v. State of Maharashtra

19 May 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 561
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a child sexual assault and murder case due to multiple investigative lapses, unreliable DNA evidence, and failure to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence DNA evidence disclosure statement Section 53A CrPC

Prakash Nishad @ Kewat Zinak Nishad v. State of Maharashtra

19 May 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction and death sentence of the appellant in a child sexual assault and murder case due to procedural lapses, unreliable DNA evidence, and failure to establish an unbroken chain of circumstances pointing exclusively to his guilt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence DNA evidence disclosure statement Section 53A CrPC

The Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. v. M. Rama Rao & Ors.

19 May 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional limit of 50% reservation, quashed the Government Order providing 100% reservation to Scheduled Tribes, conditionally saved appointments made, and directed States not to exceed reservation limits in future.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant reservation Scheduled Tribes Government Order No.3 of 2000 100% reservation

K.J. Somaiya Medical College and Research Centre v. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences

19 May 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that medical college lecturers qualified at appointment cannot be terminated retrospectively under later regulations and awarded compensation in lieu of reinstatement due to delay and subsequent employment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Medical Council of India Regulations 1998 qualification for appointment retrospective application reinstatement

K.J. Somaiya Medical College and Research Centre v. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences

19 May 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that medical college lecturers qualified at appointment cannot be terminated based on later regulations, denied reinstatement due to delay, and awarded compensation in lieu thereof.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Medical Council of India Regulations 1998 qualification for appointment non-retroactivity reinstatement

CENTRAL GST DELHI - III v. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD

19 May 2023 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; DIPANKAR DATTA

The Supreme Court held that User Development Fee collected under Section 22A of the Airports Authority of India Act is a statutory levy and not a taxable service, dismissing the revenue's appeal for service tax on such fees.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant User Development Fee Service Tax Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 Section 22A