Supreme Court of India

15,092 judgments

Year:

Ramathal & Ors. v. K. Rajamani

17 Aug 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2023INSC737
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the doctrine of non est factum to invalidate a fraudulently altered Power of Attorney and consequent sale deeds, restoring the plaintiffs' ownership rights over disputed land.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Power of Attorney non est factum fraudulent misrepresentation sale deed

Chimanlal Hargovindas v. Revenue Officer, Pune

17 Aug 2023 · Bela M. Trivedi; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's enhanced compensation for land acquisition, affirming the application of a one-third deduction for development costs as a correct judicial exercise under the Punjab Land Acquisition Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition market value development cost deduction Punjab Land Acquisition Act 1894

Mala v. State of Punjab

17 Aug 2023 · Bela M. Trivedi; Dipankar Datta · 2023INSC735
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's enhancement of compensation for land acquisition with a one-third deduction for development charges, dismissing the State's appeal under Article 136.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition market value development charges Land Acquisition Act 1894

Konkan Railway Corporation Limited v. Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking

17 Aug 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; J.B....
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting tax reimbursement claims, holding that limited judicial review under the Arbitration Act does not permit reinterpreting contracts if the arbitral view is reasonable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 contractual interpretation

Y.P. Lele v. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.

16 Aug 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah

The Supreme Court held that the explanation to Order XVII Rule 2 CPC does not apply to defendants who have not led evidence, allowing the setting aside of an ex parte decree under Order IX Rule 13 CPC and restoring the suit for adjudication on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte decree Order IX Rule 13 CPC Order XVII Rule 2 CPC withdrawal of Vakalatnama

H. Vasanthi v. A. Santha

16 Aug 2023 · Bela M. Trivedi; S.V.N. Bhatti

The Supreme Court held that an unmarried daughter's coparcenary status under Section 29A does not entitle her to partition of property effectively severed from the joint family estate by prior valid partition and sale.

property appeal_dismissed Significant coparcenary Hindu Succession Act Section 29A partition

Pesala Nookaraju v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

16 Aug 2023 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023INSC734
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court clarified that the three-month limit in Section 3(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act applies to delegation of power to issue detention orders, not the detention period itself, and upheld the validity of a 12-month preventive detention order following due procedure.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant preventive detention Section 3(2) Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act bootlegger public order

DHARMIN BAI KASHYAP v. BABLI SAHU

16 Aug 2023 · Bela M. Trivedi; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2023 INSC 712

The Supreme Court held that an election petition seeking only recounting of votes without claiming reliefs under Rule 6 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayats Rules, 1995 is not maintainable and dismissed the appeal challenging the High Court's order setting aside the recounting.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Election Petition Recounting of votes Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 Rule 6 of Rules of 1995

Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences & Anr. v. Bikartan Das & Ors.

16 Aug 2023 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court held that the enhanced retirement age of 65 years for AYUSH doctors under the Ministry of AYUSH does not automatically apply to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS whose retirement age is governed by their Bye-Laws.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant age of superannuation autonomous body Fundamental Rules 56(bb) Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences

State of Karnataka Lokayukta Police v. S. Subbegowda

16 Aug 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 INSC 669

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot discharge an accused under Section 482 CrPC after charges are framed and trial has progressed, without finding failure of justice due to sanction irregularity under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sanction for prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act Section 19(3) and (4) failure of justice

Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai v. 3I Infotech Ltd.

14 Aug 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 711

The Supreme Court held that service tax demands must be based on correct classification of taxable services, dismissed Revenue's appeal on erroneous classification, and upheld CESTAT's findings subject to reconsideration of SEZ exemption claims.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax Finance Act, 1994 Intellectual Property Service Information Technology Software

Manoj Kumar Soni v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

11 Aug 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 705
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside convictions under Sections 411 and 120-B IPC due to unreliable disclosure statements, hostile seizure witnesses, improper trial procedure, and absence of conspiracy agreement.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 411 IPC Section 120-B IPC disclosure statement Section 27 Evidence Act

M/S LARSEN AIR CONDITIONING AND REFRIGRATION COMPANY v. UNION OF INDIA

11 Aug 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 708

The Supreme Court held that courts lack jurisdiction to reduce the statutory 18% interest awarded by an arbitral tribunal under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and reinstated the original interest rate in the award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(7)(b) Interest rate on arbitral award Judicial interference in arbitration

Union of India v. K. Pushpavanam

11 Aug 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 701

The Supreme Court held that courts cannot compel the legislature or executive to enact laws or confer statutory status on bodies, limiting judicial mandamus to recommendations and advisory directions.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant writ of mandamus legislative mandate Law Commission of India Liability in Tort

Devesh Sharma v. Union of India

11 Aug 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Sudhanshu Dhulia
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Rajasthan High Court's quashing of the NCTE notification including B.Ed. degree holders as eligible primary teachers, holding that B.Ed. is not an appropriate qualification for primary education under the RTE Act and constitutional mandates.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 National Council for Teacher Education B.Ed. qualification Diploma in Elementary Education

Devesh Sharma v. Union of India

11 Aug 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2023 INSC 704
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Rajasthan High Court's quashing of the NCTE notification including B.Ed. as a qualification for primary school teachers, holding it arbitrary and contrary to the Right to Education Act and constitutional mandate for quality education.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Education Act, 2009 National Council for Teacher Education B.Ed. qualification Diploma in Elementary Education

Sathyan v. State of Kerala

11 Aug 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 703

The Supreme Court upheld conviction under Section 8 of the Abkari Act based on reliable official witnesses despite delay and absence of independent witnesses, but reduced the sentence considering the prolonged trial period.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 8 Abkari Act official witnesses independent witnesses delay in investigation

Kalubhai Khatubhai v. State of Gujarat

10 Aug 2023 · Bela M. Trivedi; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 713

The Supreme Court restored the Reference Court's higher compensation award for land acquired for the Narmada Project, emphasizing fair market value and equal treatment of similarly situated landowners.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value Reference Court

Balla @ Farhat v. State of Madhya Pradesh

10 Aug 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court acquitted accused for offences under Sections 411 and 120B IPC due to lack of evidence of conspiracy and recovery of stolen property, emphasizing that conspiracy requires agreement between two or more persons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal conspiracy Section 120B IPC dishonestly receiving stolen property Section 411 IPC

Imtiyaz Ahmad Malla v. The State of Jammu and Kashmir and Others

09 Aug 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 INSC 179

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of a police constable’s appointment due to criminal antecedents despite acquittal, emphasizing that only an honourable acquittal entitles reinstatement and the police authority’s suitability decision is final unless mala fide.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant honourable acquittal criminal antecedents police recruitment Screening Committee