Supreme Court of India

15,092 judgments

Year:

Avtar Singh v. State of Punjab

02 Aug 2023 · Hima Kohli; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants of rape charges due to inherent improbabilities, contradictions in prosecution evidence, and acquittal of a co-accused breaking the chain of events.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape sexual assault prosecutrix credibility acquittal of co-accused

Nirmala Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh

01 Aug 2023 · B. R. Gavai; J. B. Pardiwala · 2023 INSC 662
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court converted the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, recognizing grave and sudden provocation and mitigating circumstances.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC culpable homicide grave and sudden provocation

bc6e836291b14a2a55f425994294beb66816f9927496f2a05404117d5b90435b

01 Aug 2023 · A. S. Bopanna; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of amendments to Rajasthan's mineral concession rules replacing 'first come, first served' with auction and lottery, holding no vested right exists in prior applicants and emphasizing the State's regulatory authority.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant mining leases Mines and Minerals Act 1957 Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules 1986 auction and lottery

The State of Rajasthan v. Sharwan Kumar Kumawat

01 Aug 2023 · A. S. Bopanna; M. M. Sundresh · 2023 INSC 661

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of amendments introducing auction and rejecting pending mining lease applications, holding no vested or fundamental right arises from mere applications and legitimate expectation cannot override public interest and statutory powers.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant mining lease vested right legitimate expectation Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules

Ashok Kumar v. U India E Yours Company Limited

31 Jul 2023 · J. K. Maheshwar; K. V. Venathan

The Supreme Court held that delay in intimation and leaving ignition key in the vehicle do not constitute fundamental breaches justifying outright rejection of insurance claims, allowing the appeal and directing proportional claim settlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance claim vehicle theft policy condition breach delay in intimation

Ashok Kumar v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd

31 Jul 2023 · J.K. Maheshwari; K.V. Viswanathan · 2023 INSC 659

The Supreme Court held that immediate police intimation satisfies insurance policy conditions in theft cases and breach of policy by leaving keys in ignition is not fundamental, allowing claim settlement on a non-standard basis despite earlier complaint withdrawal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance claim theft of vehicle breach of policy conditions Condition No.1

मो. असफाक आलम v. झारखंड राज्य एवं अन्य

31 Jul 2023 · एस. रर्वीन्र भट्ट; अरत्रर्वंद कुमार

The Supreme Court held that arrest under Section 498A IPC should not be automatic and granted anticipatory bail, directing strict adherence to procedural safeguards to prevent arbitrary arrests.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 498A IPC arrest guidelines personal liberty

MD. ASFAK ALAM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

31 Jul 2023 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; ARAVIND KUMAR · 2023 INSC 660
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's rejection of anticipatory bail in a matrimonial offence case, emphasizing procedural safeguards against arbitrary arrest and directing strict compliance with arrest protocols under Sections 41 and 41A CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC Section 41 CrPC Section 41A CrPC

Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors.

28 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 653

The Supreme Court held that suspension of a medical license is not a permissible punishment under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and restored the appellant's license suspended during contempt proceedings.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 suspension of medical license National Medical Commission Act, 2019 professional misconduct

Sandeep Kumar v. State of Haryana & Anr.

28 Jul 2023 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2023 INSC 654
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that under Section 319 CrPC, courts must summon additional accused if prima facie evidence appears during trial, and set aside the High Court's order that prematurely assessed evidence to deny summoning.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning additional accused unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC

Vernon v. Maharashtra State

28 Jul 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court granted bail to appellants charged under UAPA, holding that mere membership of a banned organization without prima facie evidence of terrorist acts does not justify denial of bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act bail prima facie evidence terrorist organization membership

Vernon Gonsalves v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

28 Jul 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2023 INSC 655
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed bail appeals of Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira under UAPA, holding that the materials prima facie establish their involvement in terrorist activities, justifying denial of bail under Section 43D(5).

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Section 43D(5) UAPA bail under UAPA prima facie true

B.P. Naagar v. Raj Pal Sharma

28 Jul 2023 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2023 INSC 657
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court remanded a suit concerning valuation and court fee payable for declaration and cancellation of deeds, clarifying the scope of rejection of plaint orders and supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.

civil other Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Court fee valuation Declaration suit Cancellation of deed

Ex Sepoy Madan Prasad v. Union of India and Others

28 Jul 2023 · Hima Kohli; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 656

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of an army personnel for habitual overstaying of leave, affirming the Summary Court Martial's authority to impose dismissal under the Army Act, 1950.

military_law appeal_dismissed Significant Army Act 1950 Section 39(b) Summary Court Martial overstaying leave

Nk Gursewak Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

27 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 648
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court reduced the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, modifying the sentence to the period already served.

criminal sentence_modified Significant exception 4 to Section 300 IPC culpable homicide not amounting to murder sudden fight heat of passion

Dilip Kumar v. Brajraj Shrivastava & Anr.

26 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 670

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate must record statements of all witnesses named in a complaint before dismissing it under Section 203 Cr.P.C., and upheld the High Court's remand for proper inquiry.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 202 Cr.P.C. Section 203 Cr.P.C. complaint dismissal Magistrate inquiry

Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited v. Suresh Chand Jain

26 Jul 2023 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra

The Supreme Court held that special leave petitions under Article 136 against NCDRC orders are not maintainable as a matter of routine and must be preceded by exhaustion of alternative remedies under the Consumer Protection Act or writ jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Article 136 Constitution of India Consumer Protection Act 1986 Consumer Protection Act 2019 National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

M/S UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD v. SURESH CHAND JAIN & ANR.

26 Jul 2023 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 649
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that appeals under Article 136 lie only against original orders of the National Consumer Commission and directed the petitioner to approach the High Court under Articles 226/227 to challenge appellate orders, dismissing the Special Leave Petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Article 136 Constitution Consumer Protection Act 1986 Consumer Protection Act 2019 National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Suresh Thipmppa Shetty v. State of Maharashtra

26 Jul 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court overturned the convictions of appellants for murder conspiracy due to reasonable doubt arising from acquittal of main accused and insufficient evidence linking them to the crime.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal conspiracy murder reasonable doubt presumption of innocence

Hem Raj v. The New India Assurance Company Limited

25 Jul 2023 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjwal Bhuyan
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an insurer must pay medical expenses under a valid motor insurance policy if supported by credible evidence, allowing the appellant’s appeal to that extent with interest and costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor vehicle insurance medical expenses claim consumer dispute redressal insurance repudiation