Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Gian Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh

18 May 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC, ruling that minor discrepancies in eyewitness testimony do not create reasonable doubt when corroborated by medical evidence and the defence version is inherently contradictory.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 304 Part II IPC eyewitness testimony minor discrepancies medical evidence

Salem Muslim Burial Ground Protection Committee v. State of Tamil Nadu

18 May 2023 · V. Ramasubramanian; Pankaj Mithal

The Supreme Court held that the suit land is not a wakf property due to lack of valid creation and procedural compliance, and dismissed the appeal upholding the grant of possession under Section 19A of the Tamil Nadu Abolition Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant wakf property Section 19A Tamil Nadu Abolition Act ryotwari patta Muslim law

Sakshi Arha v. Rajasthan High Court

18 May 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 INSC 559

The Supreme Court held that in absence of explicit rules, caste/category certificates for reservation need not be submitted by the last date of application and candidates producing valid certificates when demanded cannot be denied reservation benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reservation category certificate last date of application eligibility cut-off

Sakshi Arha v. Rajasthan High Court

18 May 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court held that in absence of explicit rules, valid category certificates produced after the last date of application but before final selection entitle candidates to reservation benefits in recruitment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reservation category certificate last date of application eligibility

Ravi Mandal v. State of Uttarakhand

18 May 2023 · Hrishikesh Roy; Manoj Misra

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants in a murder case due to unreliable chance witness testimony, procedural lapses in weapon recovery, and failure to prove the chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant last seen evidence chance witness delay in disclosure recovery of weapon

Ravi Mandal v. State of Uttarakhand

18 May 2023 · Hrishikesh Roy; Manoj Misra

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a murder case due to unreliable chance witness testimonies, procedural lapses in weapon recovery, and failure to strictly scrutinize prosecution evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant last seen evidence chance witness delayed disclosure recovery of weapon

Madhupandit Das v. State of West Bengal

18 May 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against ISKCON leaders for alleged bus theft due to inordinate delay, lack of prima facie evidence, and abuse of process of law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of criminal proceedings Section 482 CrPC abuse of process inordinate delay

Sebil Elanjimpally v. State of Odisha

18 May 2023 · K. M. Joseph; Aravind Kumar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the non-surrender of a co-accused cannot be a valid ground to deny bail and directed the High Court to reconsider the appellant's bail application expeditiously.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail co-accused Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 20(b)(ii)(C)

M/S B AND T AG v. MINISTRY OF DEFENCE

18 May 2023 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala · 2023 INSC 549

The Supreme Court held that bona fide bilateral negotiations suspend limitation for invoking arbitration, and allowed the petition for appointment of arbitrator under Section 11(6) as not time barred.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Limitation Act, 1963 Article 137

M/S B AND T AG v. MINISTRY OF DEFENCE

18 May 2023 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court held that a Section 11(6) petition for appointment of arbitrator is not barred by limitation if filed within three years from the 'breaking point' after bona fide bilateral negotiations, and limitation and arbitrability issues are generally for the arbitral tribunal to decide.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Limitation Act, 1963 Article 137

Government of NCT of Delhi v. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors.

18 May 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that a purchaser of land after issuance of Section 4 notification under the 1894 Act cannot claim lapse of acquisition under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, as such sale transactions are void and confer no rights against the State.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 4 notification Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 24(2)

Government of NCT of Delhi v. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors.

18 May 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that a purchaser of land after issuance of Section 4 notification under the 1894 Act has no right to claim lapse of acquisition under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, as such sale transactions are void and do not confer title.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Right to Fair Compensation Act 2013 Section 24(2) Section 4 notification

The Animal Welfare Board of India v. Union of India

18 May 2023 · K. M. Joseph; Ajay Rastogi; Aniruddha Bose; Hrishikesh Roy;...
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of State Amendments legalizing traditional bovine sports, holding they do not violate animal welfare laws or fundamental rights and constitute a valid exercise of legislative power.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Jallikattu Bullock Cart Race Kambala

Indian Oil Corporation v. Ajit Kumar Singh

17 May 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that judicial review of departmental inquiries is limited to procedural fairness and upheld disciplinary punishment for tampering with tender documents based on sufficient evidence.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial review departmental inquiry disciplinary proceedings tampering

M/S. JERMYN CAPITAL LLC DUBAI v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

17 May 2023 · KRISHNA MURARI; SANJAY KUMAR

The Supreme Court modified its earlier order to permit the appellant to unconditionally withdraw ₹38.52 crore along with accrued fixed deposit interest, setting aside the bank guarantee condition.

criminal appeal_allowed bank guarantee fixed deposit interest sale proceeds Securities Appellate Tribunal

Y. BALAJI v. KARTHIK DESARI

16 May 2023 · KRISHNA MURARI; V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order directing de novo investigation wiping out earlier probe in a job-for-cash scam, affirming the exceptional nature of such orders and upholding victims' locus standi.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant de novo investigation Section 173 CrPC Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 job-for-cash scam

Jini Dhanrajgir v. Shibu Mathew

16 May 2023 · A. S. Bopanna; Dipankar Datta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the executing court's order holding third-party objections maintainable in execution proceedings, directing enquiry on merits and dismissing the appeal seeking immediate possession delivery.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Execution of decree Order XXI Rule 97 CPC Objections by third parties Lis pendens

Meenal Bhargava v. Naveen Sharma & Ors.

16 May 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court held the contemnor guilty of civil and criminal contempt for disobeying its order to return the minor child to India, imposing imprisonment and a fine while emphasizing its unrestricted power under Article 129.

criminal conviction_upheld Significant contempt of court inherent jurisdiction Article 129 Constitution of India civil contempt

M/s Super Label Mfg. Co. v. New India Assurance Company Limited

16 May 2023 · A.S. Bopanna; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court held that the accidental fire and extinguishment caused damage to insured machinery, overruling the narrow rusting-time argument, and directed the insurer to pay the appellant substantial compensation beyond the surveyor's limited assessment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant fire insurance claim surveyors report proximate cause rusting and corrosion

M/s D.N. Singh v. Commissioner of Income Tax

16 May 2023 · Hrishikesh Roy · 2023 INSC 543
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a carrier cannot be deemed owner of goods for invoking Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, setting aside additions made on alleged short delivery of bitumen.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 69A Income Tax Act ownership common carrier bitumen