Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

Digambar v. State of Maharashtra

28 Apr 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld murder convictions but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, holding the case did not meet the 'rarest of rare' threshold for capital punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC rarest of rare doctrine death penalty life imprisonment

Rajasthan v. Dr. Hameer Singh Chauhan & Ors.

28 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that permanent absorption of government employees into Dairy Federations terminates their lien with the State Government, disqualifying them from pension benefits from the State.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant lien permanent absorption pensionary benefits government service

State of Rajasthan v. Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan

28 Apr 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that permanent absorption in the Dairy Federations terminated the respondents’ lien with the State Government, denying them pensionary benefits from the State after retirement benefits were received from the Dairy Federations.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant lien permanent absorption pensionary benefits Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951

T.D. Vivek Kumar v. Ranbir Chaudhary

28 Apr 2023 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that a contractual clause providing for double earnest money as compensation excludes specific performance, allowing the appeal to restore the Trial Court's decree refusing specific performance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance sale agreement earnest money contractual clause

Prasanna and Others v. Mudegowda

27 Apr 2023 · Rajesh Bindal; Aravind Kumar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that a suit for possession filed within six months of prior litigation declaring title is not barred by limitation, confirming Mudegowda's valid title and possession over the property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant title declaration perpetual injunction possession suit limitation

Rajiv Kumar Jindal v. B. C. I. Staff Colony Residential Welfare Association

27 Apr 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 INSC 439

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of the sole bidder's offer for a sick company's asset sale due to non-compliance with mandatory bank guarantee and payment conditions, affirming the validity of the subsequent sale process under the Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Sick Industrial Companies Act 1985 Asset Sale Committee rules Bank guarantee Bid acceptance

Rajiv Kumar Jindal and Others v. BCI Staff Colony Residential Welfare Association and Others

27 Apr 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's setting aside of a defective auction sale of sick company assets due to non-compliance with mandatory procedural guidelines and absence of competitive bidding.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Sick Industrial Companies Act Asset Sale Committee guidelines auction sale bank guarantee

Rajiv Kumar Jindal v. B. C. I. Staff Colony Residential Welfare Association

27 Apr 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of the sole bidder's offer for sick company assets due to non-compliance with mandatory procedural rules, emphasizing the necessity of strict adherence to sale conditions under the Sick Industrial Companies Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Sick Industrial Companies Act Asset Sale Committee Bank Guarantee Public Auction

Rajiv Kumar Jindal and Others v. BCI Staff Colony Residential Welfare Association and Others

27 Apr 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's setting aside of auction confirmation due to non-compliance with statutory valuation and payment guidelines, emphasizing the necessity of competitive bidding and procedural fairness in asset sales under the Sick Industrial Companies Act.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 Asset Sale Committee guidelines auction sale competitive bidding

Uttar Pradesh State v. Rachna Wills & Ors.

27 Apr 2023 · N. V. Ramana; Sanjay Y. Chandrachud · 2023 INSC 441
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that teacher appointments in minority institutions under the Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act require mandatory approval by the District Inspector of Schools, and amended regulations apply to all pending selections, invalidating appointments without such approval.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 teacher selection District Inspector of Schools approval minority educational institutions

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rachna Hills

27 Apr 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that mandatory DIOS approval is essential for teacher appointments in minority institutions, rejecting the concept of deemed appointment and applying amended selection Regulations even to pending proposals.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act 1921 Section 16-FF District Inspector of Schools approval minority institutions

Uttar Pradesh State v. Rachna Wills & Ors.

27 Apr 2023 · Nanjay Y. Chandrachud; Narasimha

The Supreme Court held that teacher appointments in minority institutions require DIOS approval and that amendments to selection rules apply prospectively, protecting vested rights of candidates selected before the amendments.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant DIOS approval teacher appointment Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Rules minority educational institutions

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rachna Hills

27 Apr 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that teacher appointments in minority institutions under the Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act require mandatory DIOS approval, no deemed appointment arises from delay, and amended rules apply to pending selections.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 Section 16-FF District Inspector of Schools (DIOS) teacher appointment

Bothilal v. The Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau

26 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants in a heroin trafficking case due to inadmissibility of confessional statements, procedural lapses in sample drawing, and failure to prove possession beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act confessional statement Section 25 Indian Evidence Act search and seizure

Bothilal v. The Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau

26 Apr 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants in a narcotics case, holding that confessional statements to police officers are inadmissible, procedural safeguards in sample drawing were violated, and possession of contraband was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act confessional statement Section 25 Indian Evidence Act possession of contraband

Rakesh Sharma v. Kavita

26 Apr 2023 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court held that prolonged separation and acrimony amounting to mental cruelty justify divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, allowing the husband's appeal and restoring the divorce decree.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) cruelty mental cruelty

Rakesh Raman v. Kavita

26 Apr 2023 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court allowed the husband's appeal, holding that irretrievable breakdown of marriage evidenced by long separation and repeated failed reconciliations constitutes cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act, thereby justifying divorce and awarding permanent alimony.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 cruelty irretrievable breakdown divorce

Union of India v. Santosh Kumar Singh

26 Apr 2023 · Sanjiv Khanna; Aravind Kumar

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful discharge of a recruit from the Railway Protection Force before formal appointment based on adverse antecedents, holding that acquittal in criminal trial does not automatically entitle appointment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 antecedent verification discharge before formal appointment acquittal and employment

Union of India v. Santosh Kumar Singh

26 Apr 2023 · Sanjiv Khanna; Aravind Kumar

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of pre-appointment discharge of a recruit in the Railway Protection Force based on antecedent verification despite subsequent acquittal in criminal trial.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 antecedent verification discharge before appointment acquittal and employment

Vijay Kumar Ghai v. State of West Bengal

26 Apr 2023 · Krishna Murari; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2023 INSC 438

The Supreme Court held that its judgment is binding but must be applied after factual scrutiny in each case, dismissing the applicant's plea for blanket application and quashing of criminal proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 132 Section 135 abuse of process