Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Narender Singh v. State of Haryana

18 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal directing appointment of a meritorious candidate delayed by employer's failure to issue NOC, while protecting the incumbent's service by accommodating him in a vacant post.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant No Objection Certificate Government appointment Merit-based selection Delay in issuance of NOC

The State of Bihar v. Pawan Kumar

18 Jan 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court upheld interim mining permissions granted to Bihar State Mining Corporation pending fresh environmental clearances and rejected bidders' claims to vested rights based on prior contracts.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant mining activities District Survey Report environmental clearance National Green Tribunal

The State of Bihar v. Pawan Kumar

18 Jan 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of prior mining contracts and permitted interim mining under strict environmental safeguards pending fresh regulatory approvals in Bihar.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant mining activities District Survey Report environmental clearance National Green Tribunal

Jaibunisha v. Meherban & Ors.

18 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cryptic bail orders for accused in a murder case, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned bail orders considering the gravity of offences and prior absconding.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail grant of bail Section 319 CrPC absconding accused

Mamtaz v. Gulsuma Alias Kulusuma

18 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that a second appeal cannot quash an ex parte decree dismissed on limitation grounds and remand to Trial Court, but must remit to First Appellate Court to decide condonation of delay and appeal on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte decree condonation of delay Order IX Rule 13 CPC Section 96 CPC

Mamtaz v. Gulsuma Alias Kulusuma

18 Jan 2022 · M.R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that a second appeal cannot quash an ex parte decree dismissed on limitation grounds without following proper CPC procedure and allowed revival of the condonation application, remanding the matter to the First Appellate Court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte decree condonation of delay Order IX Rule 13 CPC Section 96 CPC

Ishwarji Nagaji Mali v. State of Gujarat

18 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a murder conspiracy case, emphasizing the need for judicial discretion and consideration of prima facie evidence in serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail murder criminal conspiracy circumstantial evidence

Ishwarji Nagaji Mali v. State of Gujarat

18 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a murder-conspiracy case, holding that bail cannot be granted mechanically without considering the prima facie evidence and seriousness of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail murder criminal conspiracy circumstantial evidence

Bijay Kumar Sinha v. Tripurari Sharan

18 Jan 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai · 2022 INSC 63

The Supreme Court held that the State of Bihar's failure to implement pension benefits as directed amounts to contempt and directed the State to show cause.

administrative other Significant contempt of court pensionary benefits pre-absorption service State of Bihar

BIJAY KUMAR SINHA v. TRIPURARI SHARAN

18 Jan 2022 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; B.R. GAVAI

The Supreme Court held that the State of Bihar's failure to grant pensionary benefits by counting prior service as directed amounts to wilful contempt and directed the State to show cause.

administrative other Significant contempt of court pensionary benefits prior service counting State of Bihar

Geeta Devi v. State of U.P. & Ors.

18 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that the High Court must independently reappreciate the entire evidence in appeals against acquittals and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after quashing the summary dismissal of the appeal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 378 CrPC reappreciation of evidence presumption of innocence

Sharmila Bagchi @ Gangopadhayay v. Sourav Gangopadhayay

18 Jan 2022 · Surya Kant

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a divorce petition to the family court in the petitioner’s place of residence for convenience and effective justice.

family appeal_allowed transfer petition divorce Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 family court

Sharmila Bagchi @ Gangopadhayay v. Sourav Gangopadhayay

18 Jan 2022 · Surya Kant

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a pending divorce suit to the Family Court in the petitioner's place of residence for convenience and effective adjudication.

family appeal_allowed transfer petition divorce suit Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 family court

Atlanta Limited v. Union of India

18 Jan 2022 · N. V. Ramana; A. S. Bopanna; Hima Kohli
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the arbitral award upholding extension of time, wrongful termination, and idle hire charges claims, emphasizing limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Act 1940 scope of judicial interference extension of time contract termination

Bhagwani v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

18 Jan 2022 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; B.R. GAVAI; B.V. NAGARATHNA

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for rape and murder of a child but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment after emphasizing the need to consider mitigating factors and fair trial safeguards.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence death sentence rarest of rare case Section 313 CrPC

Devas Multimedia Private Ltd. v. Antrix Corporation Ltd.

17 Jan 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld the winding up of Devas Multimedia Private Limited on grounds of fraud under Section 271(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, ruling that failure to advertise the petition did not vitiate proceedings and that the detailed findings of fraud justified winding up.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant winding up fraud Companies Act 2013 Section 271(c)

Devas Multimedia Private Ltd. v. Antrix Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

17 Jan 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld the winding up of Devas Multimedia Private Limited under Section 271(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 on grounds of fraud, ruling that advertisement of the petition is not mandatory in such cases and dismissing challenges on procedural and constitutional grounds.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant winding up fraud Companies Act 2013 Section 271(c)

Seethakathi Trust Madras v. Krishnaveni

17 Jan 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; M. M. Sundresh
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that a decree for specific performance obtained without impleading bona fide purchasers is not binding, and restored the dismissal of the respondent's suit for possession of disputed land.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance bona fide purchaser adverse possession Section 100 CPC

Seethakathi Trust Madras v. Krishnaveni

17 Jan 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that a decree for specific performance obtained without impleading bona fide purchasers is not binding on them and set aside the High Court's judgment allowing the respondent's suit for possession of disputed land.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance bona fide purchaser Section 19(b) Specific Relief Act Section 100 CPC

Ms Sarita Singh v. M/s Shree Infosoft Private Limited

12 Jan 2022 · D. Y. Chandrachud; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a transient business visit without formal deputation agreement does not constitute deputation, and thus the employer cannot recover deputation expenses from the employee.

civil appeal_allowed Significant deputation employment contract overseas deputation burden of proof