Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

State of Andhra Pradesh v. State of Karnataka & Anr.

28 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court dismissed Andhra Pradesh's suit seeking injunctions against Karnataka's water projects, directing fresh proceedings under the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act after a 19-year delay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 interim injunction water disputes inter-state river water

Moreshar S/o Yadaorao Mahajan v. Vyankatesh Sitaram Bhedi

27 Sep 2022 · B. R. Gavai; C. T. Ravikumar · 2022 INSC 1027
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's denial of specific performance due to non-joinder of necessary parties in a joint family property sale dispute but affirmed refund of amounts paid with interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance necessary parties joint ownership agreement to sell

Moreshar S/o Yadaorao Mahajan v. Vyankatesh Sitaram Bhedi

27 Sep 2022 · B. R. Gavai; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in a suit for specific performance due to non-joinder of necessary parties who jointly owned the property, affirming refund of the amount paid with interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance necessary parties joint ownership non-joinder

Kolli Satyanarayana v. Valuripalli Kesava Rao Chowdary

27 Sep 2022 · B. R. Gavai; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld the denial of specific performance due to non-compliance with contractual time limits for statutory permission but enhanced the refund amount payable to the purchaser.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance Urban Land Ceiling Act time limit contractual conditions

Delhi Development Authority v. Shiv Kumar; Government of NCT of Delhi v. Shiv Kumar; Government of NCT of Delhi & Another v. Ombir Singh Sethi; Government of NCT of Delhi v. Vikas

26 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act unless both possession and compensation are absent for five years prior to the Act's commencement, setting aside High Court orders declaring lapse.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24(2) 2013 Act land acquisition lapse possession and compensation Right to Fair Compensation Act

Delhi Development Authority v. Shiv Kumar

26 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if either possession is taken or compensation is paid/tendered before the Act's commencement, setting aside High Court orders declaring lapse.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 land acquisition lapse possession and compensation Land Acquisition Act 1894

K. Madan Mohan Rao v. Bheemrao Baswanthrao Patil

26 Sep 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court set aside a High Court order dismissing an election petition due to non-availability of a reasoned judgment and restored the matter for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC reasoned judgment election petition Representation of the People Act, 1951

Satish Chandra Yadav v. Union of India

26 Sep 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of CRPF personnel for deliberately suppressing pending criminal cases in verification forms, affirming that such suppression justifies termination irrespective of subsequent acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant suppression of material facts verification form termination of service criminal antecedents

Satish Chandra Yadav v. Union of India

26 Sep 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court upheld termination of CRPF personnel for deliberate suppression of pending criminal cases during recruitment, emphasizing the high integrity standards required in disciplined forces.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant suppression of material facts verification form criminal antecedents termination from service

Balkrishna Rama Tarle v. Phoenix ARC Private Limited

26 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, the District Magistrate's role is ministerial to assist secured creditors in taking possession of secured assets without adjudicating tenancy disputes, which must be resolved separately before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 14 District Magistrate powers secured creditor

Balkrishna Rama Tarle v. Phoenix ARC Private Limited

26 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, the District Magistrate's role is ministerial to assist secured creditors in taking possession of secured assets without adjudicating tenancy disputes, which must be resolved before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 14 District Magistrate powers secured creditor

JAGDISH PRASAD SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

26 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court held that leave encashment forms part of salary payable jointly by State and aided institutions, while gratuity liability lies solely with the aided institution, and struck down arbitrary conditions denying these benefits upon absorption under the 2010 Rules.

labor appeal_allowed Significant leave encashment gratuity salary definition aided educational institutions

Jagdish Prasad Saini v. Rajasthan State

26 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhatt

The Supreme Court held that gratuity and cash payment in lieu of privilege leave form part of salary payable jointly by the State and aided institutions to employees absorbed under the 2010 Rules, setting aside the High Court's contrary order.

labor appeal_allowed Significant gratuity cash payment in lieu of privilege leave salary definition aided educational institutions

JAGDISH PRASAD SAINI & ORS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS

26 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that leave encashment forms part of salary payable by State and aided institutions, while gratuity liability lies solely with aided institutions, setting aside the High Court's rejection of these claims.

labor appeal_allowed Significant leave encashment gratuity salary definition aided educational institutions

M/s. Munjal Showa Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs

23 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld Customs Duty demand on forged DEPB licenses, affirming that fraud voids exemption and extended limitation applies, while buyer's knowledge affects only penalty, not duty liability.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Duty DEPB licenses forgery fraud

M/s. Munjal Showa Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs

23 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the demand of Customs Duty on forged DEPB licenses, affirming that fraud justifies invoking extended limitation and that duty liability arises regardless of the buyer's knowledge or intent.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Duty DEPB licenses forgery fraud

Kalavati v. Mirza Kaisar Baig; Chandrakala v. Mirza Kaisar Baig

23 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court enhanced motor accident compensation by fixing the deceased drivers' income at Rs.10,000 per month with future prospects, modifying the High Court's awards accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of dependency motor accident claim compensation enhancement future prospects

Kalavati v. Mirza Kaisar Baig; Chandrakala v. Mirza Kaisar Baig

23 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for loss of dependency in fatal accident claims by considering a higher monthly income, future prospects, and appropriate multipliers, partly allowing the appeals.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation loss of dependency future prospects multiplier

VESSEL M.V. POLARIS GALAXY v. BANQUE CANTONALE DE GENEVE

23 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that an order adding a party in an Admiralty Suit is not appealable under the Commercial Courts Act unless enumerated, and Gulf Petroleum FZC was neither a necessary nor proper party to the suit for misdelivery of cargo under the Bill of Lading.

commercial appeal_allowed Significant Admiralty Suit Bill of Lading Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017

Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai v. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd.

23 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that disputes over apportionment of compensation under the Land Acquisition Act must be resolved under Section 30 and quashed the High Court's order allowing a subsequent purchaser to be impleaded in an appeal challenging compensation enhancement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 30 apportionment of compensation impleadment