Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. M/S Tata Communications Ltd.

22 Sep 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that BSNL's revised infrastructure charges circular cannot be applied retrospectively but allowed a notional annual increase prospectively from 2013, modifying the Tribunal's orders accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant infrastructure charges retrospective applicability telecom service providers interconnection agreements

Gopi @ Goverdhannath v. Sri Ballabh Vyas

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; C.T. Ravikumar · 2022 INSC 1000

The Supreme Court upheld eviction of tenants who malafidely denied the landlord's title supported by a registered sale deed and affirmed the landlord's bona fide requirement under the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant eviction registered sale deed malafide denial of title Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960

Gopi @ Goverdhannath v. Sri Ballabh Vyas

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld eviction of tenants who mala fide denied the landlord's title established by a registered sale deed, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement and concurrent findings of lower courts.

property appeal_dismissed Significant eviction registered sale deed mala fide denial of title Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960

D. Swamy v. Karnataka State Pollution Control Board

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of ex post facto Environmental Clearance and dismissed the appeal seeking closure of a bio-medical waste treatment facility operating with valid consent despite lack of prior clearance.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant Environmental Clearance EIA Notification 2006 ex post facto clearance Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

D. Swamy v. Karnataka State Pollution Control Board

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of ex post facto Environmental Clearance under the Environment (Protection) Act and dismissed the appeal seeking closure of a Bio-Medical Waste Treatment Facility operating with valid consent despite lack of prior clearance.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant Environmental Clearance Ex post facto clearance Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2006 Environment (Protection) Act 1986

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD v. AJAY BHATIA

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; A.S. Bopanna
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that execution of a possession decree must be confined to the specifically identified suit property with proper demarcation, and mesne profits are payable from lawful termination of tenancy until possession is relinquished.

civil appeal_allowed Significant possession decree mesne profits execution of decree demarcation of suit property

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD v. AJAY BHATIA

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; A.S. Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that execution of a possession decree must be confined to the specifically described suit property, directing fresh demarcation and computation of mesne profits from lawful tenancy termination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant possession decree mesne profits execution of decree immovable property

K. Priyadharshini v. M/s Gammon India Limited

22 Sep 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by awarding future prospects at 40% and upheld Income Tax Returns as valid evidence for calculating the deceased's income.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation future prospects Income Tax Return

Maitreya Doshi v. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd. and Anr.

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the initiation of insolvency proceedings against Doshi Holdings as a co-borrower under the loan agreements despite no direct loan disbursement to it, distinguishing pledge from financial debt.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process financial debt pledge

Maitreya Doshi v. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd. and Anr.

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the initiation of insolvency proceedings against Doshi Holdings as a co-borrower under the loan agreements, distinguishing pledgor status from financial debtor liability under the IBC.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process financial debt pledge

Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India

22 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli; Pamidighantam Sri Nara...

The Supreme Court upheld its 2017 final compensation order under Article 142, dismissing claims for increased compensation based on actual landholding, holding that the settlement is binding and not subject to modification.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Article 142 Constitution Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal Award Project Affected Families Resettlement and Rehabilitation

Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India

22 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli; Pamidighantam Sri Nara...
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking enhancement of compensation beyond the fixed Rs 60 lakhs per family determined in its 2017 order as a full and final settlement under Article 142.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal resettlement and rehabilitation project affected families Article 142 Constitution

Ashok G. Rajani v. Beacon Trusteeship Ltd.

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that an insolvency application admitted under Section 7 of the IBC can be withdrawn before constitution of the Committee of Creditors, and directed the NCLT to consider the pending settlement application accordingly.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 7 IBC Section 12A IBC Committee of Creditors

M/s. DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY LIMITED v. OSCAR INVESTMENTS LIMITED

22 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee; K.M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held respondents and associated entities guilty of contempt for violating orders restraining alienation of shares, emphasizing strict compliance with court undertakings to protect enforcement of a foreign arbitral award.

civil contempt_found_and_proceedings_initiated Significant Foreign Arbitral Award enforcement Contempt of Court Shareholding status quo Pledge and encumbrance of shares

LRS. & ORS v. SARASWATI & ORS

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court restored the First Appellate Court's finding of valid adoption and ownership, holding that the High Court erred in entertaining a Second Appeal without a substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Second Appeal Substantial Question of Law Adoption

LRS. & ORS v. SARASWATI & ORS

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court restored the First Appellate Court's finding of valid adoption and ownership, holding that the High Court erred in entertaining a Second Appeal without a substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Second Appeal Substantial Question of Law Adoption

NKD Maritime Limited v. The Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a vessel sold under Admiralty jurisdiction vests free of prior encumbrances, but the purchaser is liable for port dues and anchorage charges accruing from the date of sale sanction and possession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Admiralty sale vessel sale encumbrances anchorage charges

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Central Cooperative Housing Society and Others

22 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld that land sold in violation of Section 154 UP Act vests in the State, validated NOIDA's cancellation of allotments, and directed allotment of apartments to 844 eligible cooperative society members to settle protracted litigation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 Section 154 excess land cooperative society

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Kendriya Karamchari Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti

22 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee; K.M. Joseph

The Supreme Court directed NOIDA to allot flats to 844 verified members of a cooperative society, settling long-pending land ceiling disputes and clarifying that land transfers violating Section 154 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition Act do not automatically vest in the State without statutory declaration.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 154 U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act land ceiling laws cooperative society land holdings NOIDA land allotment

Vinay Prakash Singh v. Sameer Gehlaut

22 Sep 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that custody undergone in connection with another case cannot be set off against a sentence in a contempt petition, and the imprisonment term commences from the date of the sentencing order.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Court Section 428 CrPC Custody Set off detention