Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. G.R. Meghwal

23 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal and High Court orders directing reconsideration of promotion by excluding an adverse, inconsistent, and improperly communicated ACR grading, affirming the requirement of fair opportunity to represent against adverse entries.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Annual Confidential Report ACR communication natural justice promotion

Union of India v. G.R. Meghwal

23 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal and High Court orders directing reconsideration of promotion eligibility excluding an arbitrary adverse ACR grading given without timely communication or opportunity to represent.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Annual Confidential Report ACR grading promotion natural justice

Jigar @ Jimmy Pravinchandra Adatiya v. State of Gujarat

23 Sep 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka · 2022 INSC 1013
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that extension of investigation period under the 2015 Act requires producing the accused before the Special Court and informing them, failing which the extension is illegal and default bail must be granted.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant default bail Section 167 CrPC extension of investigation period Article 21

Jigar @ Jimmy Pravinchandra Adatiya v. State of Gujarat

23 Sep 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that extension of investigation period under the Gujarat Control of Terrorism Act without producing the accused before the Court and informing them violates Article 21, entitling the accused to default bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant default bail Section 167 CrPC extension of investigation period production of accused

Navika Kumar v. Union of India

23 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court ordered transfer and clubbing of all FIRs against the petitioner arising from the same incident to a single investigating agency and restrained coercive action temporarily, emphasizing uniform investigation and parity among co-accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant transfer of FIR single investigating agency IFSO Unit Delhi Police multiple FIRs

Radhamohan Hembram & Ors. v. State of Odisha & Ors.

23 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court directed early disposal of a writ petition challenging ASO seniority and allowed provisional promotions subject to its outcome, balancing administrative needs and pending litigation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant seniority fixation Assistant Section Officers promotions interim order

Sulakshna v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

23 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that payment of insurance premium to an authorized agent before the insured's death triggers insurance cover from that date, and the insurer cannot deny claim liability due to delayed remittance by the agent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance premium payment authorized agent insurance cover commencement consumer dispute

Sulakshna v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

23 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court held that insurance coverage commences from the date premium is paid to the authorized intermediary, and the insured cannot be prejudiced by delayed remittance of premium to the insurer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance premium payment authorized intermediary insurance coverage commencement consumer dispute

Aminuddin v. State of Uttar Pradesh

23 Sep 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court set aside bail granted solely on parity grounds in a brutal daylight murder case, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders balancing liberty and public interest.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail parity serious offence daylight murder

Aminuddin v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

23 Sep 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order granted solely on parity with co-accused whose bail was disapproved, emphasizing the need for reasoned consideration in serious offences like murder.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail parity serious offence murder

USHA GOPIRATHNAM v. P.S. RANGANATHAN

23 Sep 2022 · B.R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a partner's retirement by notice to the acting partner and ruled that legal heirs do not automatically become partners, while directing partial allotment of land to heirs to promote family harmony.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partnership retirement legal heirs as partners Indian Partnership Act 1932 Section 24 Partnership Act

Jeetubha Khansangji Jadeja v. Kutchh District Panchayat

23 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court held that illegal termination under the Industrial Disputes Act entitles reinstatement with continuity and backwages, setting aside a lower court order substituting reinstatement with compensation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 illegal termination reinstatement backwages

Jeetubha Khansangji Jadeja v. Kutchh District Panchayat

23 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court held that illegal termination of a workman entitles reinstatement with continuity and backwages unless exceptional circumstances exist, setting aside a High Court order substituting reinstatement with compensation after protracted litigation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 illegal termination reinstatement backwages

Balram Singh v. Kelo Devi

23 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari · 2022 INSC 1011

The Supreme Court held that a suit for permanent injunction based solely on an unregistered agreement to sell is not maintainable and restored the trial Court's dismissal of such suit and allowance of possession counter-claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant unregistered agreement to sell permanent injunction specific performance Registration Act

Balram Singh v. Kelo Devi

23 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a suit for permanent injunction cannot be decreed on the basis of an unregistered agreement to sell when specific performance is barred, allowing the appeal and restoring the trial Court's judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant unregistered agreement to sell permanent injunction specific performance Registration Act

Inspector of Panchayats and District Collector, Salem v. S. Arichandran

23 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that where a disciplinary inquiry is vitiated by breach of natural justice, the matter must be remitted for fresh inquiry rather than direct reinstatement, and set aside the High Court's reinstatement order accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry natural justice misappropriation reinstatement

Harpal Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab

23 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation amounts for land acquisition in Punjab appeals, denied interest due to delay, and ordered payment of enhanced compensation with solatium within three months.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation enhancement solatium statutory benefits

Narayan & Ors. v. Manager Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

22 Sep 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including future prospects and increasing the interest rate to 7.5%, modifying the High Court's award accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim future prospects compensation multiplier method

Narayan & Ors. v. Manager Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

22 Sep 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including future prospects and increasing the interest rate to 7.5%, allowing the appeal of the claimants.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim future prospects compensation enhancement rate of interest

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. M/S Tata Communications Ltd.

22 Sep 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that BSNL's revised infrastructure charges cannot be applied retrospectively from 2009 but allowed a notional 10% annual increase to be charged prospectively from 2013.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant infrastructure charges retrospective effect telecom service providers interconnection agreements