Supreme Court of India

17,536 judgments

Year:

Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences v. Dr. Yerra Trinadh

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that in absence of any provision for re-evaluation, courts cannot order re-evaluation of examination answer scripts under Article 226, quashing the High Court's re-evaluation orders while upholding declared results.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant re-evaluation digital evaluation Article 226 examination results

Shakeel Ahmed v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Nov 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court directed the Maharashtra Government to implement the Justice B.N. Srikrishna Commission's recommendations on riot victims' compensation, police reforms, and prosecution, including payment of interest for delayed compensation.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Justice B.N. Srikrishna Commission Mumbai riots 1992-1993 communal violence compensation to victims

M/s. OCL INDIA LTD. v. STATE OF ORISSA

04 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that industrial townships excluded from municipal limits under Article 243-Q remain local areas for entry tax levy, upholding the constitutional validity of such taxation.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant local area entry tax industrial township Article 243-Q

OCL INDIA LTD. v. STATE OF ORISSA

04 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 33

The Supreme Court held that industrial townships excluded from municipal limits under Article 243-Q remain local areas for entry tax levy, upholding the constitutional validity of such taxation by States.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant local area entry tax industrial township Article 243-Q

VGP Marine Kingdom Pvt Ltd v. Kay Ellen Arnold

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that at the Section 11(6) stage, the Court must appoint an arbitrator unless the dispute is manifestly non-arbitrable, and pendency of other proceedings is not a ground to refuse such appointment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator arbitrability Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement

B.A. Umesh v. Union of India

04 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...

The Supreme Court commuted the death sentence of B.A. Umesh to life imprisonment due to unlawful solitary confinement and delay in disposal of mercy petition, emphasizing constitutional protections under Article 21.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death sentence mercy petition solitary confinement Article 21

State Bank of India v. Arvindra Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot extend the time for payment under a One Time Settlement Scheme beyond the stipulated period as it amounts to contract modification requiring mutual consent, and thus set aside the High Court's order granting extension.

civil appeal_allowed Significant One Time Settlement OTS Scheme Article 226 Extension of time

VGP Marine Kingdom Pvt Ltd v. Kay Ellen Arnold

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, holding that pendency of other proceedings does not bar arbitration and arbitrability should be decided by the arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator arbitrability Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority

03 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court clarified that its judgment on tax exemption for charitable trusts is final for decided assessment years and that the Revenue must apply the law declared on a case-by-case basis for future years, dismissing the Revenue's application for broader reassessment powers.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 2(15) charitable trusts general public utility

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority

03 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...

The Supreme Court clarified that its prior judgment on charitable trusts under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act is final for decided assessment years, allowing the revenue to apply the law to future years without re-examining past assessments.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 2(15) Income Tax Act charitable trusts general public utility assessment years

Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi · (2011) 13 SCC 621
Cites 3 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition challenging the death sentence of Mohd. Arif alias Ashfaq, holding that call data records without mandatory Section 65B certification are inadmissible but affirming conviction based on other incriminating circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 65B Indian Evidence Act Call Data Records admissibility Circumstantial evidence Death sentence review

Perry Kansagra v. Smriti Kansagra

03 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court convicted Perry Kansagra for civil and criminal contempt for willfully disobeying custody orders, breaching undertakings, misleading the Court, and obstructing justice in a transnational child custody dispute.

family conviction_upheld Significant contempt of court civil contempt criminal contempt child custody

Maringmei Acham v. M Maringmei Khuripou

03 Nov 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that substitution of legal representatives in an interlocutory appeal enures for the entire suit, preventing abatement despite non-substitution in the original suit, and allowed the appeal to proceed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant abatement legal representatives substitution Order XXII CPC

Maringmei Acham v. M Maringmei Khuripou

03 Nov 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that bringing legal representatives on record in an interlocutory appeal prevents abatement of the suit after the death of the sole plaintiff, allowing continuation of the suit and appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant abatement legal representatives Order XXII CPC interlocutory appeal

Mahanadi Coal Fields Ltd. v. Mathias Oram

03 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld a uniform cut-off date for compensation under the CBA Act, clarified limited applicability of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, and directed strict compliance with compensation and rehabilitation for tribal landowners displaced by coal mining acquisitions.

property appeal_allowed Significant Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 land acquisition compensation determination

Delhi Development Authority v. Krishan Lal Arora

02 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken, even if compensation has not been paid, overruling the High Court's contrary decision.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act land acquisition possession compensation

Delhi Development Authority v. Krishan Lal Arora

02 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken, even if compensation has not been paid, overruling the High Court's contrary decision.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 land acquisition lapse possession and compensation Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal

The State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Maroti s/o Kashinath Pimpalkar

02 Nov 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C.T. Ravikumar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashment of FIR and charge-sheet against a doctor accused of failing to report sexual offences under the POCSO Act, holding that such quashment at the threshold was improper and the case must proceed to trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC POCSO Act failure to report offence sexual offences against children

Delhi Development Authority v. Bhagwat Singh

02 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken, even if compensation has not been paid, overruling earlier contrary precedent.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 land acquisition lapse possession and compensation Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal

D. KRISHNA MOHAN v. HON’BLE SECRETARY

01 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; M.R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna · 2022 INSC 1149

The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of merit and denied permission for in-person arguments, reaffirming the limited scope of review petitions.

constitutional petition_dismissed Review Petition Supreme Court Legal Service Committee Inherent Jurisdiction Permission to appear in person