Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. v. Nizamuddin

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court modified the compensation awarded for loss of use of a hypothecated vehicle illegally sold, directing reasonable damages limited to a fixed period with interest, emphasizing the need for evidence-based and proportionate compensation.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant compensation consumer forum hypothecated vehicle loss of use

State Bank of India v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

04 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court held that LTC exemption under Section 10(5) applies only to domestic travel and upheld the employer's liability to deduct TDS on LTC payments involving foreign travel, dismissing SBI's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Leave Travel Concession LTC exemption Tax Deducted at Source Section 10(5) Income Tax Act

State Bank of India v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

04 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudhanshu Dhulia
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld that LTC payments involving foreign travel are not exempt under Section 10(5) and employers must deduct TDS under Section 192(1), dismissing SBI's appeal against default liability.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Leave Travel Concession Tax Deducted at Source Section 10(5) Income Tax Act Section 192(1) Income Tax Act

Delhi Development Authority v. Damini Wadhwa

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh · 2022 INSC 1174

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent purchaser cannot claim lapse of land acquisition under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and acquisition does not lapse where possession and compensation are impeded by pending litigations.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) Act 2013 lapse of acquisition subsequent purchaser

Delhi Development Authority v. Damini Wadhwa

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent purchaser cannot claim lapse of land acquisition under Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013, and acquisition does not lapse where possession or compensation is prevented by pending litigation.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) of Act 2013 lapse of acquisition subsequent purchaser

State Bank of India v. Arvindra Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that High Courts cannot extend payment deadlines under OTS schemes beyond sanctioned terms under Article 226, affirming that OTS benefits and extensions are not a matter of right but subject to contractual terms and eligibility criteria.

civil appeal_allowed Significant One Time Settlement OTS Scheme Article 226 Extension of time

Employees Provident Fund Organisation v. Sunil Kumar B.

04 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Aniruddha Bose; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2022 INSC 1171
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the 2014 amendments to the Employees’ Pension Scheme except the additional employee contribution requirement, holding the amendments valid under the Act and Constitution except that the 1.16% employee contribution is ultra vires.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Pension Scheme, 1995 Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 6A Section 7

Employees Provident Fund Organisation & Anr. v. Sunil Kumar B. & Ors.

04 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Aniruddha Bose; Sudhanshu Dhulia
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the 2014 amendments to the Employees’ Pension Scheme increasing pensionable salary ceiling and changing pension computation, but struck down the requirement for additional employee contributions without legislative sanction.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Pension Scheme 1995 Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 Section 6A Section 7

Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences v. Dr. Yerra Trinadh & Others

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that in absence of any statutory provision, courts cannot order re-evaluation of examination answer scripts under Article 226, quashing the High Court's re-evaluation orders while protecting declared results.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant re-evaluation digital evaluation Article 226 examination results

Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences v. Dr. Yerra Trinadh

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that in absence of any provision for re-evaluation, courts cannot order re-evaluation of examination answer scripts under Article 226, quashing the High Court's re-evaluation orders while upholding declared results.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant re-evaluation digital evaluation Article 226 examination results

Shakeel Ahmed v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Nov 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court directed the Maharashtra Government to implement the Justice B.N. Srikrishna Commission's recommendations on riot victims' compensation, police reforms, and prosecution, including payment of interest for delayed compensation.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Justice B.N. Srikrishna Commission Mumbai riots 1992-1993 communal violence compensation to victims

M/s. OCL INDIA LTD. v. STATE OF ORISSA

04 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that industrial townships excluded from municipal limits under Article 243-Q remain local areas for entry tax levy, upholding the constitutional validity of such taxation.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant local area entry tax industrial township Article 243-Q

OCL INDIA LTD. v. STATE OF ORISSA

04 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 31

The Supreme Court held that industrial townships excluded from municipal limits under Article 243-Q remain local areas for entry tax levy, upholding the constitutional validity of such taxation by States.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant local area entry tax industrial township Article 243-Q

VGP Marine Kingdom Pvt Ltd v. Kay Ellen Arnold

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that at the Section 11(6) stage, the Court must appoint an arbitrator unless the dispute is manifestly non-arbitrable, and pendency of other proceedings is not a ground to refuse such appointment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator arbitrability Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement

B.A. Umesh v. Union of India

04 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...

The Supreme Court commuted the death sentence of B.A. Umesh to life imprisonment due to unlawful solitary confinement and delay in disposal of mercy petition, emphasizing constitutional protections under Article 21.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death sentence mercy petition solitary confinement Article 21

State Bank of India v. Arvindra Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot extend the time for payment under a One Time Settlement Scheme beyond the stipulated period as it amounts to contract modification requiring mutual consent, and thus set aside the High Court's order granting extension.

civil appeal_allowed Significant One Time Settlement OTS Scheme Article 226 Extension of time

VGP Marine Kingdom Pvt Ltd v. Kay Ellen Arnold

04 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, holding that pendency of other proceedings does not bar arbitration and arbitrability should be decided by the arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator arbitrability Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority

03 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court clarified that its judgment on tax exemption for charitable trusts is final for decided assessment years and that the Revenue must apply the law declared on a case-by-case basis for future years, dismissing the Revenue's application for broader reassessment powers.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 2(15) charitable trusts general public utility

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority

03 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...

The Supreme Court clarified that its prior judgment on charitable trusts under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act is final for decided assessment years, allowing the revenue to apply the law to future years without re-examining past assessments.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 2(15) Income Tax Act charitable trusts general public utility assessment years

Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi · (2011) 13 SCC 621
Cites 3 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition challenging the death sentence of Mohd. Arif alias Ashfaq, holding that call data records without mandatory Section 65B certification are inadmissible but affirming conviction based on other incriminating circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 65B Indian Evidence Act Call Data Records admissibility Circumstantial evidence Death sentence review