Supreme Court of India
17,536 judgments
Korukanti Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition against its earlier dismissal of the Special Leave Petition upholding convictions under Sections 376, 302, and 309 IPC, finding no error apparent on record.
Korukanti Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition against dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, holding no error apparent on record in upholding convictions under Sections 376, 302, and 309 IPC.
D. LAXMAMMA v. S. HALAPPAAND
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition due to an unexplained delay of 975 days, refusing to condone the delay on limitation grounds.
D. LAXMAMMA v. S. HALAPPAAND
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition due to an unexplained delay of 975 days, refusing to condone the delay on limitation grounds.
International Merchandising Company v. Commissioner, Service Tax, New Delhi
The Supreme Court held that service tax applies to manpower supply services without requiring employer-employee relationship but reversed tax on programme producer services and disallowed extended limitation and penalty in a dispute involving interpretation of statutory provisions.
L. NARASIMHAIAH v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record, after condoning the delay in filing.
L. Narasimhaiah v. The Divisional Controller
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record, condoning delay but refusing to interfere with its earlier decision in the Special Leave Petition.
State of Gujarat v. Pravinkumar R. Patel
The Supreme Court dismissed a Review Petition due to an unexplained delay of 794 days, refusing to condone the delay on limitation grounds.
State of Gujarat v. Pravinkumar R. Patel
The Supreme Court dismissed a Review Petition due to an unexplained delay of 794 days, refusing to condone the delay.
Naveen v. State of Haryana & Others
The Supreme Court held that the power to summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC is extraordinary and requires strong evidence, and set aside the High Court’s order summoning the appellant due to insufficient evidence of complicity.
Naveen v. State of Haryana & Others
The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in summoning the appellant as an additional accused under Section 319 CrPC without strong and cogent evidence, and set aside the order summoning him.
D. KRISHNA MOHAN v. HON’BLE SECRETARY
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition and refused permission to list it in open court, holding that no grounds existed to justify interference with the earlier order.
The State of Jharkhand v. Shailendra Kumar Rai @ Pandav Rai
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on a credible dying declaration recorded by police, rejecting the High Court's acquittal and deprecated the use of the two-finger test in rape cases.
Union of India v. Munshi Ram
The Supreme Court held that Commission Vendors absorbed into regular Railway service are entitled to count 50% of their pre-absorption service as qualifying service for pensionary benefits, affirming uniform treatment across Railway zones and upholding constitutional equality.
Union of India v. Munshi Ram
The Supreme Court held that Commission Vendors absorbed into regular Railway service are entitled to count 50% of their pre-absorption service as qualifying service for pensionary benefits, affirming parity with similarly situated employees across Railway zones.
Aroon Purie v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Supreme Court held that an Editor-in-Chief cannot be held liable for defamation without specific allegations of control, quashed proceedings against him and public servants, but allowed trial against the article's author.
Aroon Purie v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Supreme Court held that an Editor-in-Chief can be held liable for defamation only on specific allegations of control and knowledge, quashed proceedings against the Editor-in-Chief and public servants, but upheld summons against the article's author.
Directorate of Enforcement v. Padmanabhan Kishore
The Supreme Court held that a person handing over money with intent to bribe is liable under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act as involved in proceeds of crime, allowing prosecution to continue.
Directorate of Enforcement v. Padmanabhan Kishore
The Supreme Court held that a person handing over money with intent to bribe a public servant is liable under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act as the money constitutes proceeds of crime.
Chander Prakash Wadhwa v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner to file fresh bail applications on new medical grounds and directed the Trial Court to consider such applications with the aid of a Medical Board if necessary.