Supreme Court of India
18,256 judgments
Delhi Development Authority v. Krishan Lal Arora
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken, even if compensation has not been paid, overruling the High Court's contrary decision.
The State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Maroti s/o Kashinath Pimpalkar
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashment of FIR and charge-sheet against a doctor accused of failing to report sexual offences under the POCSO Act, holding that such quashment at the threshold was improper and the case must proceed to trial.
Delhi Development Authority v. Bhagwat Singh
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken, even if compensation has not been paid, overruling earlier contrary precedent.
D. KRISHNA MOHAN v. HON’BLE SECRETARY
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of merit and denied permission for in-person arguments, reaffirming the limited scope of review petitions.
Korukanti Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition against its earlier dismissal of the Special Leave Petition upholding convictions under Sections 376, 302, and 309 IPC, finding no error apparent on record.
Korukanti Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition against dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, holding no error apparent on record in upholding convictions under Sections 376, 302, and 309 IPC.
D. LAXMAMMA v. S. HALAPPAAND
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition due to an unexplained delay of 975 days, refusing to condone the delay on limitation grounds.
D. LAXMAMMA v. S. HALAPPAAND
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition due to an unexplained delay of 975 days, refusing to condone the delay on limitation grounds.
International Merchandising Company v. Commissioner, Service Tax, New Delhi
The Supreme Court held that service tax applies to manpower supply services without requiring employer-employee relationship but reversed tax on programme producer services and disallowed extended limitation and penalty in a dispute involving interpretation of statutory provisions.
L. NARASIMHAIAH v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record, after condoning the delay in filing.
L. Narasimhaiah v. The Divisional Controller
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record, condoning delay but refusing to interfere with its earlier decision in the Special Leave Petition.
State of Gujarat v. Pravinkumar R. Patel
The Supreme Court dismissed a Review Petition due to an unexplained delay of 794 days, refusing to condone the delay on limitation grounds.
State of Gujarat v. Pravinkumar R. Patel
The Supreme Court dismissed a Review Petition due to an unexplained delay of 794 days, refusing to condone the delay.
Naveen v. State of Haryana & Others
The Supreme Court held that the power to summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC is extraordinary and requires strong evidence, and set aside the High Court’s order summoning the appellant due to insufficient evidence of complicity.
Naveen v. State of Haryana & Others
The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in summoning the appellant as an additional accused under Section 319 CrPC without strong and cogent evidence, and set aside the order summoning him.
D. KRISHNA MOHAN v. HON’BLE SECRETARY
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition and refused permission to list it in open court, holding that no grounds existed to justify interference with the earlier order.
The State of Jharkhand v. Shailendra Kumar Rai @ Pandav Rai
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on a credible dying declaration recorded by police, rejecting the High Court's acquittal and deprecated the use of the two-finger test in rape cases.
Union of India v. Munshi Ram
The Supreme Court held that Commission Vendors absorbed into regular Railway service are entitled to count 50% of their pre-absorption service as qualifying service for pensionary benefits, affirming uniform treatment across Railway zones and upholding constitutional equality.
Union of India v. Munshi Ram
The Supreme Court held that Commission Vendors absorbed into regular Railway service are entitled to count 50% of their pre-absorption service as qualifying service for pensionary benefits, affirming parity with similarly situated employees across Railway zones.
Aroon Purie v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Supreme Court held that an Editor-in-Chief cannot be held liable for defamation without specific allegations of control, quashed proceedings against him and public servants, but allowed trial against the article's author.