Supreme Court of India

17,536 judgments

Year:

Sidram v. The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.

16 Nov 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's enhanced compensation award in a motor accident claim involving 45% permanent disability, emphasizing just compensation principles and rejecting unproven claims for further enhancement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability loss of earning capacity future prospects

M.P. Power Management Company Limited v. M/s Sky Power Southeast Solar India Private Limited

16 Nov 2022 · K.M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy · 2022 INSC 1208

The Supreme Court held that a Power Purchase Agreement by a government company is not a statutory contract and upheld judicial review against arbitrary termination without procedural compliance.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Statutory contract Judicial review Article 226

M.P. Power Management Company Limited v. M/s Sky Power Southeast Solar India Private Limited

16 Nov 2022 · K.M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a Power Purchase Agreement by a government company is not a statutory contract and that termination for breach of contractual conditions is subject to contractual procedure and limited judicial review, allowing the appeal and upholding termination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Statutory contract Judicial review Article 226

Sidram v. The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.

16 Nov 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's enhanced compensation award in a motor accident claim, emphasizing evidence-based assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity under the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability loss of earning capacity future prospects

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. & ANR. v. RUBFILA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

15 Nov 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that exemption from enhanced power tariff under the Kerala Government Order is available only from the date of commercial production, not energisation, and rejected the respondent's parity claim based on a withdrawn concession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Government Order 6th February 1992 enhanced power tariff exemption date of commercial production date of energisation

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. & ANR. v. RUBFILA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

15 Nov 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that exemption from enhanced power tariff under the Kerala Government Order is from the date of commercial production, not energisation, and rejected the respondent's claim to parity based on a withdrawn benefit granted to another unit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant enhanced power tariff commercial production date of energisation Government Order 1992

M/s Bombay Chemical Industries v. Deputy Labour Commissioner

14 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the Labour Court under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act lacks jurisdiction to decide disputed employer-employee relationships and set aside orders directing payment of wage difference without prior adjudication.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Section 33(C)(2) Industrial Disputes Act Labour Court jurisdiction employer-employee relationship dispute difference of wages

Singapore Airlines Ltd. v. C.I.T., Delhi

14 Nov 2022 · Surya Kant; M.M. Sundresh · 2022 INSC 1201
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that supplementary commission earned by travel agents under a principal-agent relationship with airlines constitutes commission under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, mandating TDS deduction by airlines.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 194H Income Tax Act Tax Deduction at Source Commission Principal-Agent Relationship

Singapore Airlines Ltd. v. C.I.T., Delhi

14 Nov 2022 · Surya Kant; M.M. Sundresh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that supplementary commission earned by travel agents under a principal-agent relationship with airlines constitutes commission liable to TDS deduction under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, overruling contrary High Court decisions.

tax appeal_allowed Landmark Section 194H Income Tax Act Tax Deduction at Source Principal-Agent Relationship Supplementary Commission

Amit Singh v. Ravindra Nath Pandey & Ors.

11 Nov 2022 · B. R. Gavai; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the application of the rota system under the 1992 Rules for determining seniority between promotees and direct recruits appointed in the same recruitment year, dismissing the appeal challenging the seniority list.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant seniority direct recruitment promotion rota system

Gireesan Nair & Ors. v. State of Kerala

11 Nov 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside convictions based on vitiated Test Identification Parades where accused were shown to witnesses prior to TIPs and police presence compromised the identification process, leading to acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Test Identification Parade TIP Identification evidence Delay in TIP

Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. v. VCK Shares & Stock Broking Services Ltd.

10 Nov 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that civil courts retain jurisdiction over independent suits filed by borrowers against banks under the RDB Act, and such suits cannot be transferred to the DRT without the plaintiff's consent.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 Debts Recovery Tribunal Civil Court jurisdiction Counterclaim

Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. v. VCK Shares & Stock Broking Services Ltd.

10 Nov 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that the jurisdiction of Civil Courts to try suits filed by borrowers against banks is not ousted by the RDB Act, and such suits cannot be transferred to the DRT without the plaintiff's consent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 Debts Recovery Tribunal Civil Court jurisdiction Counterclaim and set-off

Suresh G. Ramnani v. Aurelia Ana de Piedade Miranda @ Ariya Alvares & Ors.

10 Nov 2022 · Aniruddha Bose; Vikram Nath · 2022 INSC 1196
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that review petitions should be heard by the original Judge if available, and where not, the matter must be referred to the Chief Justice for administrative assignment, setting aside the High Court order rejecting transfer of the review petition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant review petition Order 47 Rule 5 CPC Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules Chief Justice

Suresh G. Ramnani v. Aurelia Ana de Piedade Miranda @ Ariya Alvares & Ors.

10 Nov 2022 · Aniruddha Bose; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that applications for transfer of review petitions must be referred to the Chief Justice for administrative assignment rather than decided judicially by another judge, setting aside the impugned order rejecting such transfer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant review petition Order 47 Rule 5 CPC Bombay High Court Rules Chief Justice

Prof. Narendra Singh Bhandari v. Ravindra Jugran

10 Nov 2022 · M.R. Shah; M.M. Sundresh
Cites 1 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of the appellant’s appointment as Vice-Chancellor for non-compliance with mandatory eligibility and procedural requirements under the University Act, 2019 and UGC Regulations, 2018.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Vice-Chancellor appointment University Grants Commission Regulations 2018 Soban Singh Jeena University Act 2019 Search-cum-Selection Committee

Registrar of Assurances v. ASL Vyapar Private Ltd.

10 Nov 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Section 47A of the Indian Stamp Act does not empower the Registering Officer to demand additional stamp duty beyond the court-approved sale price in court-monitored public auctions, preserving the sanctity of such sales.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Section 47A Indian Stamp Act court-monitored public auction market value stamp duty

Registrar of Assurances v. ASL Vyapar Private Ltd.

10 Nov 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that the Registering Officer cannot determine market value for stamp duty purposes in court-monitored public auctions, and the sale price fixed by the court must be accepted as the true market value.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Section 47A Indian Stamp Act court-monitored public auction market value stamp duty

The State of Uttarakhand v. Nalanda College of Education

10 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's policy decision refusing recognition to new B.Ed. colleges based on surplus graduates and employment concerns, reversing the High Court's quashing of that decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant State Government policy B.Ed. course recognition NCTE Regulations 2014 arbitrariness

Mahatma Gandhi University v. Rincymol Mathew

10 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala High Court’s order directing the University to count the respondent’s continuous past service from 1998 for CAS benefits under UGC Regulations despite initial temporary appointment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Career Advancement Scheme UGC Regulations past service counting temporary appointment