Supreme Court of India
8,449 judgments
M/S. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED v. M/S. INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORP LTD.
The Supreme Court upheld the invalidation of contractual clauses imposing loss of transportation charges by a monopolistic public sector undertaking as arbitrary and discriminatory, allowing refund limited by limitation period.
M/S. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED v. M/S. INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORP LTD.
The Supreme Court upheld the invalidation of contractual clauses imposing loss of transportation charges on IPCL by GAIL as arbitrary and discriminatory under Article 14, allowing refund limited by limitation period.
Vibhuti Shankar Pandey v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that regularization requires valid appointment by a competent authority against a sanctioned post, which the appellant lacked.
Vibhuti Shankar Pandey v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that regularization requires appointment by a competent authority against a sanctioned post, and mere long service or qualification relaxation does not confer such right.
Mundra & Ors. v. Union of India Ministry of Finance
The Supreme Court corrected its earlier judgment to reflect amendments to the writ petition and held that discriminatory tax exemptions must be applied retrospectively, without commenting on Article 371-F's validity.
ITC LIMITED v. AASHNA ROY
The Supreme Court set aside an excessive compensation award for hair styling negligence due to lack of evidence and remanded the matter for fresh quantification based on proper proof.
Ropen Transportation Services Private Limited v. Central Government & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the Maharashtra State Government's prohibition on aggregation of non-transport vehicles pending policy review, dismissed the petitioner's challenge to license rejection, and allowed the petitioner to seek remedy before the High Court.
Roppen Transportation Services Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's authority to prohibit pooling of non-transport vehicles by aggregators pending committee review and directed challenges to such notifications be pursued under Article 226 before the High Court.
Ropen Transportation Services Private Limited v. Central Government and Others
The Supreme Court upheld the Maharashtra government's prohibition on aggregation of non-transport vehicles pending safety review, affirming state regulatory authority and directing challenges to be made before the High Court.
Roppen Transportation Services Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's authority to prohibit pooling of non-transport vehicles by aggregators pending detailed consideration, directing challenges to be pursued under Article 226 and refusing to entertain the petitioners' challenge under Article 32.
Rana Ayyub v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Supreme Court held that territorial jurisdiction in money-laundering cases under PMLA depends on the place where any constituent act of money-laundering occurred and that such jurisdictional issues require factual determination by the trial court.
Anushka Rengunthwar v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the restriction of OCI cardholders' eligibility for medical admissions to only NRI quota seats, holding it a valid sovereign classification not violating constitutional rights.
Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Employees Union v. Maharashtra State
The Supreme Court held that excluding pre-cut-off date retirees from Fifth Pay Commission salary benefits by MSFC is unconstitutional discrimination under Article 14, directing extension of benefits with arrears to all eligible retirees except VRS beneficiaries.
Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Former Employees Association v. Maharashtra State
The Supreme Court held that excluding MSFC employees retired between 01.01.2006 and 29.03.2010 from Fifth Pay Commission salary revision benefits is discriminatory and directed payment of arrears with interest, while upholding the cut-off date for others.
Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Employees Association v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court held that excluding employees who retired between 01.01.2006 and 29.03.2010 from Fifth Pay Commission pay revision arrears violates Article 14, allowing them arrears with interest, while denying such benefits to VRS employees.
Shyam Kumar Gupta v. Shubham Jain
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal setting aside an ex parte decree for rent arrears and eviction, holding that partial compliance with Section 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act coupled with bona fide deposit entitles the defendant to contest the suit on merits.
Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld Section 33(7) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, ruling that Parliament's legislative policy permitting candidates to contest from up to two constituencies simultaneously does not violate fundamental rights.
Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 33(7) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, ruling that Parliament's legislative policy permitting candidates to contest from up to two constituencies simultaneously is not unconstitutional.
Snehasis Giri v. Subhasis Mitra
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of madrasa teacher appointments made during pendency of appeals subject to verification of eligibility and recruitment norms, limiting contempt jurisdiction to enforcing explicit judgment directions and constituting a committee to verify claims.
Snehasis Giri v. Subhasis Mitra
The Supreme Court held that appointments under the West Bengal Madrasa Service Commission Act are valid subject to verification of eligibility and recruitment norms, limiting contempt jurisdiction to enforcing explicit directions and constituting a committee to verify claims before releasing salaries.