Supreme Court of India
8,449 judgments
Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Sushil Kumar Gupta
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken, even if compensation remains unpaid, overruling earlier contrary precedents.
Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Sushil Kumar Gupta
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken, even if compensation was not paid, overruling earlier contrary precedent.
Bar Council of India v. Bonnie Foi Law College & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the Bar Council of India has the statutory authority to prescribe pre-enrolment and post-enrolment bar examinations under the Advocates Act, overruling the earlier V. Sudeer decision and validating the All India Bar Examination regime.
Bar Council of India v. Bonnie Foi Law College & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the Bar Council of India has the statutory authority to prescribe pre-enrolment examinations for advocates, overruling the earlier V. Sudeer judgment and affirming the validity of the All India Bar Examination.
Gas Point Petroleum India Limited v. Rajendra Marothi
The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with mandatory deposit rules in execution sales and prior ownership of the property invalidate the auction sale, allowing the appeal and setting aside the High Court's order.
Gas Point Petroleum India Limited v. Rajendra Marothi
The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with mandatory deposit requirements under Order 21 Rules 84 and 85 CPC and prior ownership of the property invalidated the auction sale in execution proceedings.
State of Haryana v. Subhash Chander
The Supreme Court partly allowed the State's appeal by reducing the enhanced land acquisition compensation from Rs. 2.98 crore to Rs. 2.88 crore per acre, holding that a 10% cumulative increase over the 2008 base compensation is just and supported by market evidence.
State of Haryana v. Subhash Chander
The Supreme Court partly allowed the State's appeal by reducing the enhanced land acquisition compensation awarded by the High Court from Rs. 2.98 crore to Rs. 2.88 crore per acre, applying a 10% cumulative increase on the 2008 valuation as just compensation.
राष्ट्रीय वैद्यकीय आयोग v. अण्णासाहेब चुडामर् िाटीि मेमोररयि वैद्यकीय महानवद्यािय
The Supreme Court allowed continuation of 100 MBBS admissions for 2021-22 at a medical college subject to a Rs. 2.5 crore deposit, upholding regulatory authority to withdraw increased seat permissions due to infrastructural deficiencies.
राष्ट्रीय वैद्यकीय आयोग v. अण्णासाहेब चुडामर् िाटीि मेमोररयि वैद्यकीय महानवद्यािय
The Supreme Court upheld the National Medical Commission's withdrawal of approval for increased MBBS intake at a medical college due to serious deficiencies, restricting admissions to 100 seats with conditions to protect students' interests.
National Medical Commission v. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College
The Supreme Court upheld the withdrawal of increased intake permission for a medical college due to deficiencies, stayed the High Court's order permitting admissions, but conditionally allowed 100 admissions already made subject to a penalty deposit.
Anna Mathews and Others v. Supreme Court of India and Others
The Supreme Court held that judicial review of High Court judge appointments under Article 217 is limited to eligibility and effective consultation, excluding suitability or merit from justiciability, and dismissed the writ petitions challenging the appointment.
G.T.C. INDUSTRIES LTD v. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of section 9-D of the Central Excise Act and dismissed the appellants' challenge regarding procedural breaches, emphasizing that no lis remained pending for adjudication.
G.T.C. INDUSTRIES LTD v. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of section 9-D of the Central Excise Act and dismissed the appellants' challenge as no lis remained pending, emphasizing the requirement of reasoned opinion and opportunity to be heard before invoking section 9-D.
Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited v. Satpal
The Supreme Court modified the High Court's enhanced compensation awards in a land acquisition case, emphasizing valuation based on market value prior to the earliest notification and rejecting reliance on post-notification sale deeds.
Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited v. Satpal
The Supreme Court modified the High Court’s enhanced compensation awards for land acquired for industrial development and expressway projects, emphasizing valuation based on pre-notification market values and proper application of sale deed evidence.
Delhi Development Authority v. Narvada Devi
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if either possession has been taken or compensation paid, and set aside the High Court's declaration of lapse.
Delhi Development Authority v. Narvada Devi
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if either possession has been taken or compensation paid, and set aside the High Court's declaration of lapse.
Debashis Sinha & Ors. v. M/s R.N.R. Enterprise
The Supreme Court held that developers have a statutory duty to obtain Completion Certificates and provide promised amenities, remanding a consumer complaint for fresh consideration after finding the consumer forum erred in dismissing it.
राज्य सरकार v. शक़ील अहमद
The Supreme Court clarified that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act merely due to non-possession or non-payment of compensation before 2014, overruling earlier contrary decisions.