Supreme Court of India
16,355 judgments
Delhi Development Authority v. Rambir
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken prior to its commencement, even if compensation was not tendered or deposited.
Delhi Development Authority v. Bhagi Singh
The Supreme Court held that valid possession taken before the 2013 Act prevents lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2), allowing the Delhi Development Authority's appeal against the High Court's declaration of lapse.
Delhi Development Authority v. Bhagi Singh
The Supreme Court held that possession taken prior to the 2013 Act precludes lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2), setting aside the High Court's contrary decision.
Delhi Development Authority v. Nem Chand Sharma
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken or compensation tendered, overruling earlier contrary precedents and allowing the Delhi Development Authority's appeal.
Manubhai Sendhabhai Bharwad v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld the continuation of temporary acquisition but directed ONGC to complete permanent acquisition within a year, emphasizing that prolonged temporary acquisition violates landowners' constitutional rights.
Manubhai Sendhabhai Bharwad v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld temporary acquisition of land by ONGC but directed completion of permanent acquisition within 12 months and recognized landowners' right to fair compensation under Article 300A.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Om Prakash
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken, even if compensation was not fully paid.
Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission v. Hage Mamung
The Supreme Court held that a Public Service Commission’s decision to cancel questions with wrong answer keys and award pro-rata marks to all candidates is lawful, and courts cannot order re-evaluation of select candidates’ papers absent statutory authority.
Delhi Development Authority v. Shakuntla Devi
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken, even if compensation has not been paid or tendered.
Delhi Development Authority v. Shakuntla Devi
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is taken or compensation is tendered, overruling the High Court's contrary decision.
Saurav Das v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that chargesheets under Section 173 Cr.P.C. are not required to be published on State websites, distinguishing them from FIRs, and dismissed the petition seeking such public access.
Elumalai @ Venkatesan v. M. Kamala
The Supreme Court held that a Release Deed executed by a father for valuable consideration estops his heirs from claiming a share in the grandfather's separate property despite their status as Class I heirs under Hindu law.
Jasbir Singh v. State of Punjab
The Supreme Court converted the appellant's murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, recognizing his right to private defence against an aggressor party.
Gajanand Sharma v. Adarsh Siksha Parisad Samiti
The Supreme Court held that prior approval of the Director of Education under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Non-Governmental Educational Institutions Act, 1989 is mandatory before terminating an employee of a recognized institution, even after disciplinary enquiry, and set aside the High Court's contrary decision.
Union of India v. Const Sunil Kumar
The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a CRPF personnel for misconduct, ruling that criminal classifications of offences do not limit disciplinary penalties and that judicial interference in such punishments is limited to cases of striking disproportion.
John Anthonisamy @ John v. State
The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on strong circumstantial evidence including recovery of the dead body and stolen car parts at the accused's instance, despite inconclusive post-mortem and unrelied upon extra judicial confession.
John Anthonisamy @ John v. State
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder based on strong circumstantial evidence including recovery of the dead body and stolen vehicle parts at the accused's instance, dismissing the appeal challenging the reliability of confessional evidence.
Alpine Housing Development Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Ashok S. Dhariwal
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order permitting additional evidence in a pre-2019 arbitration award challenge under Section 34, applying pre-amendment provisions and emphasizing summary nature and exceptional circumstances.
Alpine Housing Development Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Ashok S. Dhariwal
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order permitting additional evidence in a pre-2019 amendment Section 34 arbitration challenge, emphasizing the applicability of pre-amendment provisions and exceptional allowance of evidence to ensure justice without defeating arbitration's speedy disposal.
Natthu Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable sole witness testimony recorded after an unexplained delay, granting benefit of doubt.