Supreme Court of India

17,536 judgments

Year:

Delhi Development Authority v. Shakuntla Devi

20 Jan 2023 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is taken or compensation is tendered, overruling the High Court's contrary decision.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 24(2) possession

Saurav Das v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Jan 2023 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that chargesheets under Section 173 Cr.P.C. are not required to be published on State websites, distinguishing them from FIRs, and dismissed the petition seeking such public access.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant chargesheet Section 173 Cr.P.C. public access FIR publication

Elumalai @ Venkatesan v. M. Kamala

19 Jan 2023 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that a Release Deed executed by a father for valuable consideration estops his heirs from claiming a share in the grandfather's separate property despite their status as Class I heirs under Hindu law.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Release Deed Equitable Estoppel Spes Successionis Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act

Jasbir Singh v. State of Punjab

19 Jan 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court converted the appellant's murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, recognizing his right to private defence against an aggressor party.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant self-defence Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part I IPC right to private defence

Gajanand Sharma v. Adarsh Siksha Parisad Samiti

19 Jan 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that prior approval of the Director of Education under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Non-Governmental Educational Institutions Act, 1989 is mandatory before terminating an employee of a recognized institution, even after disciplinary enquiry, and set aside the High Court's contrary decision.

labor appeal_allowed Significant prior approval Director of Education termination disciplinary enquiry

Union of India v. Const Sunil Kumar

19 Jan 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 1 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a CRPF personnel for misconduct, ruling that criminal classifications of offences do not limit disciplinary penalties and that judicial interference in such punishments is limited to cases of striking disproportion.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant CRPF Act 1949 disciplinary enquiry misconduct insubordination

John Anthonisamy @ John v. State

19 Jan 2023 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on strong circumstantial evidence including recovery of the dead body and stolen car parts at the accused's instance, despite inconclusive post-mortem and unrelied upon extra judicial confession.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence recovery at instance of accused extra judicial confession post-mortem inconclusive

John Anthonisamy @ John v. State

19 Jan 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder based on strong circumstantial evidence including recovery of the dead body and stolen vehicle parts at the accused's instance, dismissing the appeal challenging the reliability of confessional evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence recovery of dead body extra-judicial confession Section 302 IPC

Alpine Housing Development Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Ashok S. Dhariwal

19 Jan 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order permitting additional evidence in a pre-2019 arbitration award challenge under Section 34, applying pre-amendment provisions and emphasizing summary nature and exceptional circumstances.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 34 Arbitration Act additional evidence ex-parte award public policy

Alpine Housing Development Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Ashok S. Dhariwal

19 Jan 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order permitting additional evidence in a pre-2019 amendment Section 34 arbitration challenge, emphasizing the applicability of pre-amendment provisions and exceptional allowance of evidence to ensure justice without defeating arbitration's speedy disposal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 34 Arbitration Act additional evidence ex-parte award public policy

Natthu Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

19 Jan 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable sole witness testimony recorded after an unexplained delay, granting benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC benefit of doubt single witness testimony delay in recording statement

Natthu Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

19 Jan 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable sole eyewitness testimony and lack of corroboration, granting benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC benefit of doubt uncorroborated testimony delay in recording statements

Gajanand Sharma v. Adarsh Siksha Parisad Samiti

19 Jan 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that prior approval of the Director of Education is mandatory under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Non-Governmental Educational Institutions Act, 1989 before terminating an employee, even after disciplinary enquiry, and set aside the High Court's contrary decision.

labor appeal_allowed Significant prior approval Director of Education Section 18 Rajasthan Non-Governmental Educational Institutions Act, 1989

Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel v. State

18 Jan 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants of murder charges due to unreliable eye witness testimony and flawed identification parade, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural safeguards in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant eye witness testimony Test Identification Parade identification evidence reasonable doubt

Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel v. State

18 Jan 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants of murder charges due to unreliable eye witness evidence and flawed identification parade procedures, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural safeguards in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant eye witness testimony test identification parade TIP procedure benefit of doubt

Rajaram S/O Sriramulu Naidu v. Maruthachalam

18 Jan 2023 · B.R. Gavai; M.M. Sundresh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to successful rebuttal of presumption by the accused, while upholding civil recovery decrees with modification based on amounts deposited.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 139 Cheque bounce

Rajaram S/O Sriramulu Naidu v. Maruthachalam

18 Jan 2023 · B.R. Gavai; M.M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the accused successfully rebutted the presumption of debt discharge by adducing credible evidence, while upholding the civil decrees with modification.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 139 Cheque bounce

Jabir v. State of Uttarakhand

17 Jan 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

The Supreme Court set aside the murder conviction based solely on the 'last seen' theory due to inconsistencies, unexplained FIR delay, and incomplete circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant last seen theory circumstantial evidence delay in FIR chain of evidence

Delhi Development Authority v. Manpreet Singh

16 Jan 2023 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent purchaser acquiring land after the 2013 Land Acquisition Act has no locus to challenge acquisition proceedings or lapsing thereof, setting aside the High Court's order in favor of the purchaser.

property appeal_allowed Significant subsequent purchaser locus standi land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013

Delhi Development Authority v. Manpreet Singh

16 Jan 2023 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent purchaser post-2013 Act has no locus to challenge land acquisition lapsing under Section 24(2), setting aside the High Court's order in favor of the purchaser.

property appeal_allowed Significant subsequent purchaser locus standi land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013