Supreme Court of India
18,256 judgments
Gas Point Petroleum India Limited v. Rajendra Marothi
The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with mandatory deposit requirements under Order 21 Rules 84 and 85 CPC and prior ownership of the property invalidated the auction sale in execution proceedings.
State of Haryana v. Subhash Chander
The Supreme Court partly allowed the State's appeal by reducing the enhanced land acquisition compensation from Rs. 2.98 crore to Rs. 2.88 crore per acre, holding that a 10% cumulative increase over the 2008 base compensation is just and supported by market evidence.
State of Haryana v. Subhash Chander
The Supreme Court partly allowed the State's appeal by reducing the enhanced land acquisition compensation awarded by the High Court from Rs. 2.98 crore to Rs. 2.88 crore per acre, applying a 10% cumulative increase on the 2008 valuation as just compensation.
National Medical Commission v. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College
The Supreme Court upheld the withdrawal of increased intake permission for a medical college due to deficiencies, stayed the High Court's order permitting admissions, but conditionally allowed 100 admissions already made subject to a penalty deposit.
Anna Mathews and Others v. Supreme Court of India and Others
The Supreme Court held that judicial review of High Court judge appointments under Article 217 is limited to eligibility and effective consultation, excluding suitability or merit from justiciability, and dismissed the writ petitions challenging the appointment.
G.T.C. INDUSTRIES LTD v. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of section 9-D of the Central Excise Act and dismissed the appellants' challenge regarding procedural breaches, emphasizing that no lis remained pending for adjudication.
G.T.C. INDUSTRIES LTD v. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of section 9-D of the Central Excise Act and dismissed the appellants' challenge as no lis remained pending, emphasizing the requirement of reasoned opinion and opportunity to be heard before invoking section 9-D.
Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited v. Satpal
The Supreme Court modified the High Court's enhanced compensation awards in a land acquisition case, emphasizing valuation based on market value prior to the earliest notification and rejecting reliance on post-notification sale deeds.
Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited v. Satpal
The Supreme Court modified the High Court’s enhanced compensation awards for land acquired for industrial development and expressway projects, emphasizing valuation based on pre-notification market values and proper application of sale deed evidence.
Delhi Development Authority v. Narvada Devi
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if either possession has been taken or compensation paid, and set aside the High Court's declaration of lapse.
Delhi Development Authority v. Narvada Devi
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if either possession has been taken or compensation paid, and set aside the High Court's declaration of lapse.
Debashis Sinha & Ors. v. M/s R.N.R. Enterprise
The Supreme Court held that developers have a statutory duty to obtain Completion Certificates and provide promised amenities, remanding a consumer complaint for fresh consideration after finding the consumer forum erred in dismissing it.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Shakeel Ahmed
The Supreme Court overruled earlier precedent and held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken before its commencement, even if compensation was unpaid.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Shakeel Ahmed
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken or compensation paid prior to 2014, overruling earlier contrary decisions.
Karnavati Veneers Pvt. Ltd. v. New India Assurance Company Limited
The Supreme Court held that repudiation of a fire insurance claim solely on the ground of non-submission of documents is unsustainable when the insurer's surveyor has assessed the loss and the insurer does not dispute it, and accordingly allowed the insured's claim.
Karnavati Veneers Pvt. Ltd. v. New India Assurance Company Limited
The Supreme Court held that repudiation of a fire insurance claim solely on the ground of non-submission of documents is unsustainable when the insurer's surveyor's undisputed loss assessment exists, and directed payment of the assessed claim amount with interest.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ram Chander Singh
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition under the 1894 Act with possession taken and compensation tendered does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, overruling the High Court's contrary decision.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ram Chander Singh
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition under the 1894 Act cannot be deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken and compensation deposited, overruling prior contrary precedent.
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Priyanka
The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of the deceased employee's heirs to death-cum-retirement gratuity despite the employee not having exercised the mandatory retirement option before his death.
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Priyanka
The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of the deceased employee’s heirs to death-cum-retirement gratuity despite the employee not having exercised the mandatory retirement option before death.