Supreme Court of India
8,449 judgments
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited
The Supreme Court upheld that deallocation of Lohara Coal Blocks post bid cut-off date constitutes a 'Change in Law' event entitling Adani Power to compensation based on the bid-identified coal source including transportation costs, dismissing Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company's appeal.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited
The Supreme Court held that cancellation of coal linkage due to regulatory buffer zone notification constitutes a 'change in law' entitling compensation under PPAs, affirming MERC and APTEL's methodology and decisions.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited
The Supreme Court upheld that deallocation of coal blocks after bid submission constitutes a 'Change in Law' event entitling the power generator to compensation based on the bid-identified coal cost including transportation.
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited v. Adani Power (Mundra) Limited
The Supreme Court upheld tariff relief granted to Adani Power due to change in coal allocation policy, dismissing Haryana Utilities' appeal and affirming the binding nature of regulatory and appellate tribunal decisions under the Electricity Act, 2003.
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and Another v. Adani Power (Mundra) Limited and Another
The Supreme Court upheld the regulatory authorities' decision that the SHAKTI Policy constitutes a Change in Law entitling Adani Power to relief under the PPAs, dismissing the appeal by Haryana Utilities.
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and Another v. Adani Power (Mundra) Limited and Another
The Supreme Court upheld regulatory authorities' concurrent findings that the SHAKTI Policy constitutes a Change in Law entitling the power generator to relief, dismissing the appeal by Haryana Utilities.
Bishanbhar Prasad v. Messrs Arafat Petrochemicals Private Limited
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of arbitrary cancellation of industrial land permissions and lease deeds without due process, affirming the necessity of natural justice and legitimate expectation protections.
Bishambhar Prasad v. M/s Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's and RIICO's authority to cancel industrial land allotment permissions granted to Respondent No. 1, emphasizing adherence to statutory rules, natural justice, and public interest.
Amod Kumar Kanth v. Association of Victim of Uphaar Tragedy
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a public servant for lack of mandatory sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C., emphasizing that prosecution without such sanction is illegal even if an offence is prima facie committed in discharge of official duties.
Amod Kumar Kanth v. Association of Victim of Uphaar Tragedy
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a public servant for lack of mandatory sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C., affirming that cognizance without such sanction is illegal even in cases of serious offences.
District Bar Association Dehradun v. Ishwar Shandilya
The Supreme Court directed all High Courts to constitute Grievance Redressal Committees to address advocates' genuine grievances and prevent illegal strikes, reaffirming that advocates must not abstain from court work.
District Bar Association Dehradun v. Ishwar Shandilya
The Supreme Court directed all High Courts to constitute Grievance Redressal Committees to address advocates' genuine grievances and prevent illegal strikes and boycotts disrupting court functioning.
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited v. Adani Power (Mumbai) Limited
The Supreme Court held that the coal inter-plant transfer arrangement dated 19 June 2013 is not a 'change in law' under the PPA, but directed the regulatory commission to assess and pass on related benefits to consumers.
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and Another v. Adani Power (Mundra) Limited and Another
The Supreme Court held that Coal India Limited's communication permitting Inter Plant Transfer of coal constitutes a 'Change in Law' event under power purchase agreements, remitting the matter to CERC to quantify compensation.
Kashi Nath Singh @ Kallu Singh v. The State of Jharkhand
The Supreme Court modified the life sentence without remission awarded for brutal rape and murder of a minor to a fixed 30-year imprisonment term without remission, balancing reformation prospects and public interest.
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited v. Adani Power (Mundra) Limited
The Supreme Court upheld regulatory commissions' orders granting tariff relief to Adani Power due to change in coal allocation policy, dismissing Haryana Utilities' appeal and affirming the principle of compensation for change in law under the Electricity Act, 2003.
Sanjay Raghunath Agarwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Supreme Court granted bail to the appellant accused of money laundering under PMLA, emphasizing the need to balance prolonged detention without charge-sheet and flight risk with appropriate bail conditions.
Problems and Miseries of Migrant Labourers v. Order
The Supreme Court directed States and Union Territories to expedite issuance of ration cards to migrant workers registered on the eShram portal to ensure their access to welfare benefits under the National Food Security Act.
SAP LABS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE 6
The Supreme Court held that the High Court can examine under Section 260A IT Act whether the Tribunal followed statutory guidelines in determining arm's length price and can interfere if perversity is shown, rejecting the absolute finality of Tribunal's determination.
SAP LABS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE 6
The Supreme Court held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's determination of arm's length price is subject to judicial scrutiny under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act if perversity or non-compliance with statutory guidelines is demonstrated, and remitted the appeals for fresh consideration accordingly.