Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Dinesh Kumar v. The State of Haryana

04 May 2023 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Sanjay Kumar
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction based on weak circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the prosecution's duty to establish a complete chain of evidence and the trial court's active role in clarifying crucial facts.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory Section 27 Evidence Act Section 165 Evidence Act

Delhi Development Authority v. Narendra Kumar Jain

04 May 2023 · M.R. Shah; Ahsanuddin Amanullah

The Supreme Court held that subsequent purchasers have no locus to challenge land acquisition or claim deemed lapse under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, setting aside the High Court's contrary decision.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition locus standi subsequent purchaser deemed lapse

Kailash Vijayvargiya v. Rajlakshmi Chaudhuri

04 May 2023 · M. R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna · Crl.A. No.1581/2021 Etc. 2023 INSC 494

The Supreme Court held that at the Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. stage, the Magistrate cannot verify the truth of allegations and must direct FIR registration if a cognizable offence is prima facie disclosed, dismissing the appeal against the High Court’s order quashing the Magistrate’s dismissal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. FIR registration Cognizable offence Preliminary inquiry

Kailash Vijayvargiya v. Rajlakshmi Chaudhuri

04 May 2023 · M.R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that at the Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. stage, the Magistrate cannot verify the truth of allegations and must direct FIR registration if a cognizable offence is prima facie disclosed, dismissing the appeal against the High Court order directing investigation into rape allegations.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. FIR registration cognizable offence Lalita Kumari judgment

M/S VISTRA ITCL (INDIA) LTD & ORS. v. MR. DINKAR VENKATASUBRAMANIAN & ANR.

04 May 2023 · M. R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that a secured creditor holding pledged shares without direct financial debt is not a financial creditor under the IBC but is entitled to rights under Sections 52 and 53, and a resolution plan cannot extinguish such rights.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant secured creditor financial creditor pledge Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

M/S TRIMURTHI FRAGRANCES (P) LTD. v. GOVT.OF N.C.T OF DELHI

04 May 2023 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; DIPANKAR DATTA

The Supreme Court upheld state sales tax on pan masala and gutkha, ruling that these products are distinct from tobacco under central excise laws and validly taxable by states despite prior exemptions.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant pan masala gutkha sales tax Central Sales Tax Act, 1956

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Glowshine Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd.

04 May 2023 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court remanded the tax appeal for fresh consideration on whether the sale of development rights constituted capital asset transfer or stock-in-trade, emphasizing comprehensive factual analysis beyond mere accounting entries.

tax appeal_allowed Significant sale of capital asset stock-in-trade development rights income tax assessment

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Glowshine Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd.

04 May 2023 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court remanded the tax appeal for fresh consideration on whether the sale of development rights was business income or capital gains, emphasizing the need to examine all relevant factors and accounting treatment.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Capital Asset Stock in Trade Development Rights

Official Liquidator v. Ujjain Nagar Palika Nigam

04 May 2023 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that the Official Liquidator is liable to pay post-liquidation municipal taxes incurred before confirmation of sale of company assets, absent clear notice transferring such liability to the purchaser.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Official Liquidator post-liquidation liabilities property tax water tax

Yamal Manojbhai v. Union of India

04 May 2023 · Krishna Murari; Sanjay Karol
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court resolved conflicting High Court judgments to hold that accused caught smuggling goods within the customs area are entitled to seek settlement under Section 127B of the Customs Act, and upheld the maintainability of the writ petition under Article 32 to protect fundamental rights.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 123 Section 127B Settlement Commission

Nagarathinam v. State through the Inspector of Police

04 May 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Ahsanuddin Amanullah

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction but allowed the appellant's premature release, rejecting the State's denial as unjustified given her mental state and long incarceration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 300 IPC Exception 1 culpable homicide not amounting to murder premature release

Government of Tamil Nadu & Others v. R. Thamraiselevam

04 May 2023 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna · 2023 INSC 490

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of Tamil Nadu Government Orders constituting Anti Land Grabbing Special Cells due to absence of statutory definitions and guidelines, emphasizing the need for clear legislation to prevent arbitrary police action.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant land grabbing Anti Land Grabbing Special Cells Government Order Article 14

Government of Tamil Nadu v. R. Thamraiselevam

04 May 2023 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of Tamil Nadu Government Orders constituting Anti Land Grabbing Special Cells due to absence of statutory definitions and guidelines, emphasizing the need for clear legislation to prevent arbitrary police powers.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant land grabbing Anti Land Grabbing Special Cells arbitrariness Article 14

Delhi Development Authority v. Narendra Kumar Jain

04 May 2023 · M. R. Shah; Ahsanuddin Amanullah

The Supreme Court held that subsequent purchasers have no locus to challenge land acquisition or claim deemed lapse under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, setting aside the High Court's contrary decision.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition locus standi subsequent purchaser deemed lapse

Damodhar Narayan Sawale v. Shri Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske & Ors

04 May 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar · 2023 INSC 491

The Supreme Court held that a duly registered sale deed carries a presumption of valid ownership transfer which cannot be negated without clear evidence, and that civil courts lack jurisdiction to decide issues under the Fragmentation Act without referring to the competent authority, thereby restoring possession decree in favor of the plaintiff.

civil appeal_allowed Significant registered sale deed possession Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Damodhar Narayan Sawale v. Shri Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske & Ors

04 May 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that a duly registered sale deed carries a presumption of valid ownership transfer and civil courts have jurisdiction to decide possession suits unless barred by statute, setting aside the High Court's voidance of the sale deed under the Fragmentation Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant registered sale deed possession Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act Transfer of Property Act

Kunti and Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.

03 May 2023 · Krishna Murari; Sanjay Karol
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings arising from an alleged breach of an agreement to sell land, holding that mere breach of contract without dishonest intention does not constitute a criminal offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant breach of contract criminal prosecution quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC

Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, Hyderabad v. Ashwani Homeo Pharmacy

03 May 2023 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court upheld the classification of 'Aswini Homeo Arnica Hair Oil' as a medicament under Chapter 30, rejecting reclassification as a cosmetic despite tariff amendments.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant classification medicament cosmetic Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. v. Varla Ramaiah

03 May 2023 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court allowed the State's appeal against the High Court's interim stay on investigation orders, holding that the executive has power to investigate alleged corruption by previous Governments and directed the High Court to decide the writ petitions on merits after impleading the Union of India.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant executive power Government Order Special Investigation Team corruption allegations

The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. v. Varla Ramaiah

03 May 2023 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the State's appeal against the High Court's interim stay on investigation orders, directing expeditious disposal of writ petitions and impleadment of the Union of India as a necessary party.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant executive power Government Orders Special Investigation Team interim stay