Supreme Court of India

17,536 judgments

Year:

Board of Governors in Supersession of Medical Council of India v. Dr. Priyambada Sharma & Others

17 Oct 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 0 · Cited by 20

The Supreme Court held that strict adherence to the Medical Council of India's admission schedule and merit-based counselling is mandatory, quashing High Court orders permitting provisional postgraduate medical admissions beyond the cut-off date.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant postgraduate medical admission NEET-PG Medical Council of India Regulations admission schedule

Gurmail Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

17 Oct 2022 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 302/149 IPC, affirming that membership in an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit murder attracts vicarious liability even without overt acts by the accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly vicarious liability constructive liability

Gurmail Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

17 Oct 2022 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sudhanshu Dhulia
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 302/149 IPC of an appellant as a member of an unlawful assembly with common object to commit murder, affirming vicarious liability despite non-recovery of weapons and death of co-accused during appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC vicarious liability constructive liability

M/s. Fashion World v. Banshidhar Multi Builders Pvt. Ltd.

17 Oct 2022 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar · 2022 INSC 1099

The Supreme Court allowed the tenant's appeal by setting aside orders striking off defence for non-payment of GST after deposit of dues and directed payment of enhanced rent as per lease terms.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 13(6) M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 tenant defence GST liability rent enhancement

M/s. Fashion World v. Banshidhar Multi Builders Pvt. Ltd.

17 Oct 2022 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court allowed the tenant's appeal setting aside orders striking off its defence for non-payment of GST after deposit of the amount and directed payment of rent with periodic enhancements as per the lease.

civil appeal_allowed Significant M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 Section 13(6) tenant defence GST liability

Sarup Singh @ Ram Sarup v. HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd.

17 Oct 2022 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident death claim by applying 40% future prospects, appropriate deductions, and fixed interest at 7.5% per annum, clarifying principles for loss of dependency and consortium.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of dependency future prospects

M/S HERO MOTOCORP LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

17 Oct 2022 · B.R. Gavai; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot override a valid legislative enactment rescinding earlier tax exemptions under the CGST Act, dismissing appeals seeking continuation of 100% excise duty exemption post-GST implementation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant promissory estoppel tax exemption CGST Act, 2017 Office Memorandum 2003

M/S HERO MOTOCORP LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

17 Oct 2022 · B.R. Gavai; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that promissory estoppel cannot override a valid legislative rescission of tax exemptions under the CGST Act, dismissing appeals seeking continuation of 100% excise duty exemption post-GST implementation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant promissory estoppel tax exemption CGST Act, 2017 Office Memorandum 2003

Radhey Sham v. State of Haryana

17 Oct 2022 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that landowners are entitled to compensation at least at Rs. 1,000 per square yard as per the Reference Court's award not challenged by the State, setting aside the High Court's reduction of compensation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value Reference Court

Radhey Sham v. State of Haryana

17 Oct 2022 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that landowners are entitled to compensation at least at Rs. 1,000 per square yard as accepted by the State, setting aside the High Court's order reducing compensation below that amount.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value Reference Court

Manoj Kumar Tiwari v. Manish Sisodia & Ors.

17 Oct 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; V. Ramasubramanian · 2022 INSC 1104

The Supreme Court held that a public servant can file a private complaint for defamation without following the special procedure under Section 199(4) CrPC, and dismissed appeals challenging the summoning orders in a defamation case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant defamation Section 199 CrPC special procedure public servant

Manoj Kumar Tiwari v. Manish Sisodia & Ors.

17 Oct 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that public servants can file defamation complaints individually under Section 199(6) CrPC without following the special procedure under Section 199(4), and summoning orders based on such complaints should be upheld if the allegations constitute an offence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant defamation Section 199 CrPC special procedure public servant

Talalkena Gowdra Parameshwarappa v. The Branch Manager

16 Oct 2022 · Nagarathna J.

The Supreme Court clarified the correct approach to assess compensation for permanent disability in motor accident claims, enhancing the award to Rs.11,67,405 based on the actual impact on earning capacity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 permanent disability loss of earning capacity compensation assessment

Kapil Kumar v. Raj Kumar

14 Oct 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court decree holding that concurrent findings on execution of a promissory note cannot be disturbed on second appeal merely due to non-examination of attesting witness when other evidence proves execution and consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant promissory note execution of document concurrent findings Section 100 CPC

Kapil Kumar v. Raj Kumar

14 Oct 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court restored the trial court decree holding that concurrent findings on execution of a promissory note cannot be upset in second appeal merely due to non-examination of attesting witness when other evidence proves execution and consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant promissory note execution of negotiable instrument Section 100 CPC Section 118 Negotiable Instruments Act

Roopwati & Ors. v. Ram Kishan & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2022 INSC 1089

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s enhanced compensation award in a motor accident claim by applying the correct age multiplier and granting future prospects with increased interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim compensation multiplier future prospects

Roopwati & Ors. v. Ram Kishan & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's enhanced compensation award in a motor accident claim by correctly applying the multiplier based on the deceased's actual age and allowing future prospects.

civil appeal_dismissed motor accident claim compensation multiplier future prospects

M/s Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. Ltd v. State of U.P

14 Oct 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; A.S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that mandatory payment of 80% estimated compensation before possession under Section 17(3A) is a pre-condition for absolute vesting of land, and Section 11A applies to acquisitions under Section 17, causing lapse if no award is passed within two years when payment is not made.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 17(3A) Section 11A compensation

M/s Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. Ltd v. State of U.P

14 Oct 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; A.S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that mandatory payment of 80% estimated compensation before possession under Section 17(3A) is essential for absolute vesting of land, and non-compliance leads to lapse of acquisition under Section 11A, protecting landowners' rights in urgent land acquisitions.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 17(3A) Section 11A compensation

Kesar Bai v. Genda Lal

14 Oct 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that a party cannot claim title both by Sale Deed and adverse possession simultaneously and set aside the decree granting permanent injunction based on adverse possession when title by Sale Deed was negated.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession registered Sale Deed permanent injunction title claim