Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

The State of Jammu & Kashmir v. Shubam Sangra

16 Nov 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court held that in case of contradictory age evidence, referral to a medical board for age determination is mandatory, and set aside lower courts' orders holding the accused as juvenile in the Kathua rape case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice age determination medical board Rule 74

The State of Jammu & Kashmir v. Shubam Sangra

16 Nov 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court held that in cases of contradictory age evidence, referral to a medical board for age determination is mandatory, setting aside lower courts' juvenile finding and remanding for fresh age inquiry.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice age determination contradictory documentary evidence medical board opinion

Wg Cdr A U Tayyaba v. Union of India

16 Nov 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli; J B Pardiwala · 2022 INSC 1206
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that women SSCOs released before the Babita Puniya judgment without filing petitions are not entitled to reinstatement but must be granted pensionary benefits to remedy past gender discrimination.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Permanent Commission Short Service Commissioned Officers Legitimate Expectation Gender Discrimination

Wg Cdr A U Tayyaba v. Union of India

16 Nov 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli; J B Pardiwala
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that women SSCOs released before the Babita Puniya judgment and not party to its proceedings are not entitled to reinstatement but must be granted pensionary benefits to remedy past gender discrimination.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Permanent Commission Short Service Commissioned Officers Women in Armed Forces Legitimate Expectation

Sidram v. The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.

16 Nov 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's enhanced compensation award in a motor accident claim involving 45% permanent disability, emphasizing just compensation principles and rejecting unproven claims for further enhancement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability loss of earning capacity future prospects

M.P. Power Management Company Limited v. M/s Sky Power Southeast Solar India Private Limited

16 Nov 2022 · K.M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy · 2022 INSC 1208

The Supreme Court held that a Power Purchase Agreement by a government company is not a statutory contract and upheld judicial review against arbitrary termination without procedural compliance.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Statutory contract Judicial review Article 226

M.P. Power Management Company Limited v. M/s Sky Power Southeast Solar India Private Limited

16 Nov 2022 · K.M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a Power Purchase Agreement by a government company is not a statutory contract and that termination for breach of contractual conditions is subject to contractual procedure and limited judicial review, allowing the appeal and upholding termination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Statutory contract Judicial review Article 226

Sidram v. The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.

16 Nov 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's enhanced compensation award in a motor accident claim, emphasizing evidence-based assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity under the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability loss of earning capacity future prospects

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. & ANR. v. RUBFILA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

15 Nov 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that exemption from enhanced power tariff under the Kerala Government Order is available only from the date of commercial production, not energisation, and rejected the respondent's parity claim based on a withdrawn concession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Government Order 6th February 1992 enhanced power tariff exemption date of commercial production date of energisation

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. & ANR. v. RUBFILA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

15 Nov 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that exemption from enhanced power tariff under the Kerala Government Order is from the date of commercial production, not energisation, and rejected the respondent's claim to parity based on a withdrawn benefit granted to another unit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant enhanced power tariff commercial production date of energisation Government Order 1992

M/s Bombay Chemical Industries v. Deputy Labour Commissioner

14 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that the Labour Court under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act lacks jurisdiction to decide disputed employer-employee relationships and set aside orders directing payment of wage difference without prior adjudication.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Section 33(C)(2) Industrial Disputes Act Labour Court jurisdiction employer-employee relationship dispute difference of wages

Singapore Airlines Ltd. v. C.I.T., Delhi

14 Nov 2022 · Surya Kant; M.M. Sundresh · 2022 INSC 1201
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that supplementary commission earned by travel agents under a principal-agent relationship with airlines constitutes commission under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, mandating TDS deduction by airlines.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 194H Income Tax Act Tax Deduction at Source Commission Principal-Agent Relationship

Singapore Airlines Ltd. v. C.I.T., Delhi

14 Nov 2022 · Surya Kant; M.M. Sundresh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that supplementary commission earned by travel agents under a principal-agent relationship with airlines constitutes commission liable to TDS deduction under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, overruling contrary High Court decisions.

tax appeal_allowed Landmark Section 194H Income Tax Act Tax Deduction at Source Principal-Agent Relationship Supplementary Commission

Vivanod Katara v. Uttar Pradesh State

12 Nov 2022 · Vidnesh Maheshwari; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court directed a proper age determination inquiry for a convict claiming juvenile status at the time of offence, emphasizing statutory safeguards under the Juvenile Justice Act and ensuring juveniles are not treated as adults in criminal proceedings.

criminal other Significant juvenile justice age determination juvenile status claim juvenile justice act 2000

Vivanod Katara v. Uttar Pradesh State

12 Nov 2022 · Vidnesh Maheshwari; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a juvenile claim can be raised at any stage and directed age verification through documentary and medical evidence, granting the petitioner the benefit of juvenile justice laws if found juvenile at the time of offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice age determination juvenile at time of offence juvenile justice act 2000

Amit Singh v. Ravindra Nath Pandey & Ors.

11 Nov 2022 · B. R. Gavai; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the application of the rota system under the 1992 Rules for determining seniority between promotees and direct recruits appointed in the same recruitment year, dismissing the appeal challenging the seniority list.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant seniority direct recruitment promotion rota system

Gireesan Nair & Ors. v. State of Kerala

11 Nov 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside convictions based on vitiated Test Identification Parades where accused were shown to witnesses prior to TIPs and police presence compromised the identification process, leading to acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Test Identification Parade TIP Identification evidence Delay in TIP

Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. v. VCK Shares & Stock Broking Services Ltd.

10 Nov 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that civil courts retain jurisdiction over independent suits filed by borrowers against banks under the RDB Act, and such suits cannot be transferred to the DRT without the plaintiff's consent.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 Debts Recovery Tribunal Civil Court jurisdiction Counterclaim

Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. v. VCK Shares & Stock Broking Services Ltd.

10 Nov 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that the jurisdiction of Civil Courts to try suits filed by borrowers against banks is not ousted by the RDB Act, and such suits cannot be transferred to the DRT without the plaintiff's consent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 Debts Recovery Tribunal Civil Court jurisdiction Counterclaim and set-off

Suresh G. Ramnani v. Aurelia Ana de Piedade Miranda @ Ariya Alvares & Ors.

10 Nov 2022 · Aniruddha Bose; Vikram Nath · 2022 INSC 1196

The Supreme Court held that review petitions should be heard by the original Judge if available, and where not, the matter must be referred to the Chief Justice for administrative assignment, setting aside the High Court order rejecting transfer of the review petition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant review petition Order 47 Rule 5 CPC Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules Chief Justice