Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

Suresh G. Ramnani v. Aurelia Ana de Piedade Miranda @ Ariya Alvares & Ors.

10 Nov 2022 · Aniruddha Bose; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that applications for transfer of review petitions must be referred to the Chief Justice for administrative assignment rather than decided judicially by another judge, setting aside the impugned order rejecting such transfer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant review petition Order 47 Rule 5 CPC Bombay High Court Rules Chief Justice

Prof. Narendra Singh Bhandari v. Ravindra Jugran

10 Nov 2022 · M.R. Shah; M.M. Sundresh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of the appellant’s appointment as Vice-Chancellor for non-compliance with mandatory eligibility and procedural requirements under the University Act, 2019 and UGC Regulations, 2018.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Vice-Chancellor appointment University Grants Commission Regulations 2018 Soban Singh Jeena University Act 2019 Search-cum-Selection Committee

Registrar of Assurances v. ASL Vyapar Private Ltd.

10 Nov 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Section 47A of the Indian Stamp Act does not empower the Registering Officer to demand additional stamp duty beyond the court-approved sale price in court-monitored public auctions, preserving the sanctity of such sales.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Section 47A Indian Stamp Act court-monitored public auction market value stamp duty

Registrar of Assurances v. ASL Vyapar Private Ltd.

10 Nov 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that the Registering Officer cannot determine market value for stamp duty purposes in court-monitored public auctions, and the sale price fixed by the court must be accepted as the true market value.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Section 47A Indian Stamp Act court-monitored public auction market value stamp duty

The State of Uttarakhand v. Nalanda College of Education

10 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's policy decision refusing recognition to new B.Ed. colleges based on surplus graduates and employment concerns, reversing the High Court's quashing of that decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant State Government policy B.Ed. course recognition NCTE Regulations 2014 arbitrariness

Mahatma Gandhi University v. Rincymol Mathew

10 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala High Court’s order directing the University to count the respondent’s continuous past service from 1998 for CAS benefits under UGC Regulations despite initial temporary appointment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Career Advancement Scheme UGC Regulations past service counting temporary appointment

Mahatma Gandhi University v. Rincymol Mathew

10 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of a university employee to have her continuous past service, including temporary and probationary periods, counted for Career Advancement Scheme benefits under UGC Regulations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Career Advancement Scheme UGC Regulations past service counting temporary appointment

RAVI NAMBOOTHIRI v. K.A. BAIJU

09 Nov 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that non-disclosure of a minor past conviction under the Kerala Police Act in election nomination forms does not amount to corrupt practice or fake disclosure warranting voiding of election under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Panchayat Raj Act Section 52(1A) Section 102(1)(ca) corrupt practice

S. Shankaraiah Thr. GPA Holder & Ors. v. The Land Acquisition Officer and Revenue Divisional Officer Peddapali Karimnagar Dist. & Ors.

09 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that when land is acquired solely for coal mining, compensation must be awarded based on full market value without deduction for development charges, affirming additional compensation for sub-soil mineral rights.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation enhancement sub-soil mineral rights coal excavation

S. Shankaraiah Thr. GPA Holder & Ors. v. The Land Acquisition Officer and Revenue Divisional Officer Peddapali Karimnagar Dist. & Ors.

09 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that when land is acquired solely for coal mining, compensation must be awarded at full market value without deduction for development charges, affirming compensation for sub-soil mineral rights.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation enhancement sub-soil mineral rights development charges deduction

Sumer Corporation v. Vijay Anant Gangan

09 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh · 2022 INSC 1188

The Supreme Court held that compensation during stay of eviction must be based on the rent the landlord could have earned, not on purchase price, and remanded the matter for fresh determination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mesne profits compensation for use and occupation eviction decree stay of eviction

Sumer Corporation v. Vijay Anant Gangan

09 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that compensation payable during stay of eviction must be based on the rent the landlord could have earned, not on purchase price, and remanded the matter for fresh determination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mesne profits compensation for use and occupation eviction decree stay of eviction

Delhi Development Authority v. Asha Jain

09 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is taken even without payment of compensation, and a subsequent purchaser cannot claim lapse of acquisition.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act land acquisition lapse possession and compensation subsequent purchaser rights

Delhi Development Authority v. Asha Jain

09 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is taken or compensation is paid, overruling Pune Municipal Corporation and dismissing lapse claims by subsequent purchasers.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act land acquisition possession compensation

M/s Texco Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. TATAAIG General Insurance Company Ltd.

09 Nov 2022 · Surya Kant; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that an insurer cannot rely on an undisclosed exclusion clause that negates coverage, affirming the insurer's duty of good faith and the consumer forum's power to declare unfair contract terms and grant relief.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant insurance contract exclusion clause adhesion contract good faith

V.S. Ramakrishnan v. P.M. Muhammed Ali

09 Nov 2022 · M.R. Shah; M.M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that readiness and willingness must be specifically adjudicated in specific performance suits and that a cheque dishonoured due to an attachment order is not worthless, remanding the case for fresh trial on these issues.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness post-dated cheque dishonour of cheque

P. Seshareddy v. State of Karnataka

09 Nov 2022 · B. R. Gavai; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an agent with an interest in the contract under an assignment deed and irrevocable power of attorney can continue arbitration proceedings despite the principal's death, restoring the trial court's order and setting aside the High Court's judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant General Power of Attorney Assignment of contract Agency termination Section 202 Indian Contract Act

Narayana Medical College v. State of Andhra Pradesh

07 Nov 2022 · M. R. Shah; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court upheld the illegality of unilateral tuition fee enhancement by the State without AFRC's recommendations and directed refund of excess fees collected by private medical colleges.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant tuition fee fixation Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee Government Order fee enhancement

Narayana Medical College v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

07 Nov 2022 · M.R. Shah; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court upheld the illegality of unilateral tuition fee enhancement by the State without AFRC's recommendations and affirmed refund of excess fees collected by private medical colleges.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant tuition fee fixation Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee Andhra Pradesh Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee Rules, 2006 Government Order 06.09.2017

Bikram Chatterji v. Union of India

07 Nov 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court recalled its earlier orders reducing contractual interest rates for builders other than Amrapali Group, reaffirming the sanctity of contracts and limiting judicial interference to matters properly before the Court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contractual interest rates Noida Authority Greater Noida Authority Amrapali Group of Companies