Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Priya Pramod Gajbe v. State of Maharashtra

11 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; J. B. Pardiwala · 2023 INSC 663
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that authentic pre-Constitutional documents establish Scheduled Tribe status and the Affinity Test cannot be the sole basis to reject such claims, allowing the appellant's claim to belong to the Mana Scheduled Tribe.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribe status Affinity Test Pre-Constitutional documents Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee

Amit Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Jul 2023 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 384
Cites 0 · Cited by 41

The Supreme Court held that police must register FIRs and conduct proper investigations into the suspicious deaths of two IIT Delhi students alleging caste-based atrocities, setting aside the High Court's refusal to direct FIR registration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant FIR registration Section 154 CrPC Section 174 CrPC SC/ST (POA) Act 1989

Pratibha Manchanda v. State of Haryana

07 Jul 2023 · Surya Kant; C.T. Ravikumar · 2023 INSC 612
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside anticipatory bail granted in a land forgery case, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and ordering a Special Investigation Team to ensure a thorough probe.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail forgery power of attorney land fraud

SRI LAKSHMANA GOWDA B.N. v. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

07 Jul 2023 · Surya Kant; Aravind Kumar · 2023 INSC 611

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by accepting credible evidence of higher income and greater disability, applying the multiplier method and awarding damages for loss of marriage prospects.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act compensation permanent disability loss of future income

Vinod Kumar v. District Magistrate Mau

07 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court held that disputes regarding apportionment of compensation under the National Highways Authority Act, 1956 must be referred to the Principal Civil Court, and the District Magistrate has no jurisdiction to decide such disputes.

property appeal_allowed Significant National Highways Authority Act, 1956 land acquisition compensation apportionment District Magistrate jurisdiction

Mohd. Naushad v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

06 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court upheld convictions of key accused in the 1996 Lajpat Nagar bomb blast case, commuted death sentence to life imprisonment, and affirmed principles on circumstantial evidence, confessional statements, and admissibility of pointing out.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence confessional statement pointing out Section 27 Indian Evidence Act

The Madras Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

06 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Sanjay Karol; Aravind Kumar · 2023INSC607
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board's unreasonable delay in approving the appellant's application to reduce contracted electricity demand was arbitrary under Article 14, entitling the appellant to a refund of excess charges paid.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contractual delay reasonable time Article 14 electricity supply agreement

Rahul Ganpatrao Sable v. Laxman Maruti Jadhav

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath · 2023 INSC 608

The Supreme Court enhanced motor accident compensation by holding that permanent disability entails 100% loss of income without deductions for uncertainties or personal expenses, applying correct multipliers, and awarding additional damages for attendant care, future medical expenses, and other heads.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability loss of income multiplier method

Rahul Ganpatrao Sable v. Laxman Maruti Jadhav

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in motor accident claims by holding that permanent disability entails 100% loss of income, applying correct multipliers, disallowing certain deductions, and awarding additional heads of damages including attendant charges and loss of consortium.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability loss of income multiplier

Pradeep v. The State of Haryana

05 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to unreliable testimony of a minor witness, inadequate judicial examination, and non-examination of crucial witnesses, emphasizing the need for careful scrutiny of child witness evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant minor witness child witness corroboration Section 118 Evidence Act

State of U.P. v. Sonu Kushwaha

05 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that penetrative sexual assault on a child below twelve years constitutes aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act, mandating the minimum sentence under Section 6, and restored the Trial Court's conviction and sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant aggravated penetrative sexual assault Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 mandatory minimum sentence child sexual abuse

S. NARAHARI v. S.R. KUMAR

05 Jul 2023 · Krishna Murari; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court held that Special Leave Petitions against High Court review orders are not maintainable under Order XLVII Rule 7 CPC and referred the question of filing subsequent SLPs after nonspeaking dismissals to a larger bench.

civil other Significant Special Leave Petition Order XLVII Rule 7 CPC Review petition Maintainability

Abdul Ansar v. State of Kerala

05 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court modified the appellant's conviction from attempt to culpable homicide under Section 308 IPC to negligence causing grievous hurt under Section 338 IPC, reducing the sentence and increasing compensation.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 308 IPC Section 338 IPC culpable homicide attempt negligence

Arun Dev Upadhyaya v. Integrated Sales Service Ltd. & Anr.

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath · 2023 INSC 610

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions and upheld the enforceability of a foreign arbitral award against a non-signatory, affirming the limited scope of judicial review under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant foreign arbitral award enforcement Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 44

ARUN DEV UPADHYAYA v. INTEGRATED SALES SERVICE LTD. & ANR.

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions and upheld the enforceability of a foreign arbitral award against a non-signatory, clarifying the limited scope of review and enforcement under Indian arbitration law.

civil petition_dismissed Significant foreign arbitral award enforcement Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 44

Pritinder Singh @ Lovely v. State of Punjab

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 614

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants in a firearm murder case due to failure of prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and lack of credible extra-judicial confession and ballistic expert evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence extra-judicial confession last seen theory ballistic expert evidence

Singrauli Super Thermal Power Station v. Ashwani Kumar Dubey

05 Jul 2023 · B.V. Nagarathna; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2023 INSC 618

The Supreme Court set aside the NGT order for violating natural justice by not allowing appellants to object to expert Committee reports and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Green Tribunal principles of natural justice expert Committee report fly ash management

Singrauli Super Thermal Power Station v. Ashwani Kumar Dubey

05 Jul 2023 · B.V. Nagarathna; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2023 INSC 618
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the NGT must comply with natural justice by allowing parties to object to expert Committee reports before issuing directions and cannot delegate its adjudicatory functions to such Committees, remanding the matter for reconsideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Green Tribunal principles of natural justice expert Committee fly ash management

Hari Prakash Shukla & Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

05 Jul 2023 · Krishna Murari; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the procedural right to be heard under the Banwasi Seva Ashram judgment applies to all claimants regardless of community, and the High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence to overturn concurrent findings of possession by lower courts, thereby setting aside the eviction order.

property appeal_allowed Significant Banwasi Seva Ashram judgment Forest Settlement Officer Section 4 Forest Act Article 226 Constitution

Hari Prakash Shukla & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

05 Jul 2023 · Krishna Murari; Ahsanuddin Amanullah

The Supreme Court held that the procedural right to be heard under the Banwasi Seva Ashram judgment applies to all claimants irrespective of community, and the High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and disturbing concurrent findings of possession by lower courts.

property appeal_allowed Significant Banwasi Seva Ashram judgment Forest Act Section 4 Article 226 jurisdiction re-appreciation of evidence