Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

State of Rajasthan v. Surendra Singh Rathore

· Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 248

The Supreme Court held that a second FIR is maintainable if it discloses new facts or a larger conspiracy distinct from the first FIR and set aside the High Court's order quashing the second FIR in a corruption case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant second FIR quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Prevention of Corruption Act

Tomorrowland Limited v. Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited

· Surya Kant; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 207

The Supreme Court held that HUDCO breached its contractual obligations and must refund the forfeited amount to the appellant, but denied interest due to the appellant's unclean hands and forum shopping.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contractual breach forfeiture refund specific relief

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Mahadeo Krishna Naik

· Dipankar Datta; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 218
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that suppression of material evidence by the employer justified review and set aside of dismissal, awarding partial back wages to the wrongfully terminated employee.

labor appeal_allowed Significant suggestio falsi suppressio veri fraud on court back wages

Om Prakash Gupta alias Lalloowa v. Satish Chandra

· Dipankar Datta; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 183
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that an application for substitution by heirs is valid regardless of who files it, set aside abatement orders, and directed the High Court to decide long-pending second appeals on merits, emphasizing a liberal approach to condoning delay and procedural compliance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant substitution of parties abatement condonation of delay Order XXII CPC

Puja Ferro Alloys P Ltd. v. State of Goa

· Dipankar Datta; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 217

The Supreme Court upheld the State of Goa's recovery of electricity tariff rebates granted under rescinded notifications, dismissing industrial consumers' claims based on entitlement after rescission and applying res judicata and public interest principles.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant electricity tariff rebate government notification rescission of notification Goa Electricity Act

SHAHJAHAN v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

· Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 528

The Supreme Court allowed the wife's appeal for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, holding that she was entitled to maintenance from the date of application and clarifying that religious fatwas have no legal enforceability in India.

family appeal_allowed Significant Section 125 CrPC maintenance wife's right to maintenance living separately without sufficient cause

Vinubhai Mohanlal Dobaria v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

· J.B. Pardiwala; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 155

The Supreme Court held that an offence under Section 276CC is committed immediately after the due date for filing returns, and subsequent offences after issuance of a show cause notice are not compoundable as first offences under the 2014 guidelines.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 276CC Income Tax Act, 1961 compounding of offences first offence

Atul Kumar Aggarwal v. Mahendra Pratap Kakan

· K. V. Viswanathan; M. M. Sundresh · 2025 INSC 564
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the bona fide need of the landlord and allowed eviction of long-term tenants, permitting legal heirs to continue proceedings under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act, 1972.

property appeal_allowed Significant bona fide need eviction Section 21(1)(a) Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act, 1972

Muppidi Lakshmi Narayana Reddy & Ors. v. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.

· Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 562
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against husband’s relatives in a dowry case due to vague allegations and absence of specific involvement, emphasizing caution against misuse of legal provisions in matrimonial disputes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings dowry harassment Section 498A IPC

Amruddin Ansari v. Afajal Ali

· J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 566

The Supreme Court held that after dismissal of a suit under Order IX Rule 2 or 3 and rejection of restoration application under Rule 4, a fresh suit is maintainable and not barred by res judicata.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order IX Rule 4 CPC fresh suit maintainability restoration of suit res judicata

├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ v. │ Investigation,3 it was observed as under: - │

· Bela M. Trivedi; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 477

The Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail in serious economic offences involving evasion of process and non-bailable warrants is an extraordinary remedy to be granted sparingly, setting aside High Court orders that ignored mandatory bail conditions and accused conduct.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail economic offences Section 447 Companies Act Section 212(6) Companies Act

STATE (NCT) OF DELHI v. RAJEEV SHARMA

· BELA M. TRIVEDI; PRASANNA B. VARALE · 2025 INSC 456

The Supreme Court held that offences prescribing only maximum imprisonment without a minimum sentence do not qualify for extended detention under Section 167(2)(a)(i) Cr.P.C., entitling the accused to default bail after 60 days.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant default bail Section 167(2) CrPC minimum sentence Official Secrets Act

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Pankaj Babulal Kotecha

· Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 792

The Supreme Court allowed MCGM's appeal, holding that a century-old lake transformed into a functional recreational park need not be restored, balancing environmental protection with sustainable urban development and public welfare.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant public trust doctrine environmental protection recreational park water body restoration

Bindu Kapurea v. Subhashish Panda

· Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 784

The Supreme Court held the DDA guilty of criminal contempt for unauthorized tree felling in the Delhi Ridge, ordered remedial ecological restoration, disciplinary action, and emphasized strict compliance with environmental and judicial safeguards.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant contempt of court Delhi Ridge tree felling environmental protection

Ravinder Singh Sidhu v. State of Punjab

· B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 727

The Supreme Court directed consolidation of multiple FIRs within each State by merging subsequent FIRs with the earliest FIR, rejecting transfer across States, and clarified procedural aspects of investigation, trial, and bail in such consolidated cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant clubbing of FIRs consolidation of criminal cases multiple FIRs special enactments

South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. SMS Limited

· Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 693
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the dispute resolution clauses in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi’s Concession Agreements do not constitute valid arbitration agreements under the Arbitration Act but prescribe mediation, setting aside conflicting High Court rulings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement dispute resolution clause mediation Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Hanumantharaju B v. M Akram Pasha

· Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 682

The Supreme Court held that pension cannot be deducted from salary for compensation calculation in motor accident claims, accepted a higher disability assessment, mandated addition of future prospects, and enhanced the compensation accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation calculation disability assessment pension deduction

Krishan Kumar v. State of Haryana

· Surya Kant; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 638
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that compensation for lands acquired in adjacent villages Kukrola and Fazalwas must be equitable, upheld the belting method for valuation, and enhanced Kukrola's inner belt compensation to match Fazalwas at INR 1.21 crore per acre.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation belting method development cut

DAIVSHALA & ORS v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR

· Manoj Misra; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 904

The Supreme Court held that a fatal accident occurring to an employee while commuting to work arises out of and in the course of employment under the Employees’ Compensation Act, applying the clarificatory and retrospective Section 51E of the ESI Act by analogy.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 accident arising out of and in the course of employment commuting accident

K. Purushottam Reddy v. Union of India

· Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 894

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional freeze on delimitation in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana until after the 2026 census, dismissing claims of discrimination based on the distinct constitutional regime governing Jammu and Kashmir as a Union Territory.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Delimitation Article 170 Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act Union Territory Jammu and Kashmir