Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Suday Shankar Jha v. State of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking a fixed-time disposal direction, holding that case management and disposal timelines are within the Trial Court’s discretion considering its workload.
Kartar Kaur v. Satbir Singh Dahiya
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition seeking early hearing of a permanent injunction suit filed by an elderly woman, granting liberty to file a fresh application to be heard by the trial court.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr. v. Atul Verma
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order granting non-functional upgradation without hearing the petitioners and directed a fresh adjudication after providing opportunity to be heard.
Master Harmanpreet Singh v. Directorate of Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a valid income certificate at the time of application is mandatory for EWS category admission and directed the DoE to issue admission guidelines in multiple languages to aid disadvantaged parents.
Smt. Manjira Devi Ayurveda Medical College and Hospital v. Uttrakhand University of Ayurveda & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by an Uttarakhand Ayurveda medical college on territorial jurisdiction grounds, directing it to approach the Uttarakhand High Court instead.
Adity A Birla Fashion and Retail Limited v. Mrs Saroj Tandon
The Delhi High Court held that mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act applies equally to counter-claims in commercial suits, but the counter-claim filed before the prospective cut-off date cannot be rejected for non-compliance.
Arvind Kejriwal & Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of Arvind Kejriwal and others for defamation against BJP, ruling that a political party is a definite entity capable of being defamed and that the complaint by its authorized representative is maintainable.
Rajendra Kumar Tripathi v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for regular bail under section 436-A Cr.P.C. due to the petitioner’s failure to honor settlement, absconding, and deceptive conduct despite having served over three years in custody.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Sumitomo Corporation India (P) Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that passing final income tax assessment orders without issuing mandatory draft assessment orders under Section 144C is invalid and that limitation under Section 153 must be strictly observed.
ORBIT IN TE RIO v. AMERICAN EPAY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court referred the petition seeking interim relief to the appointed arbitrator to be disposed of under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Hav Jyoti Kumar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that diseases arising post-entry are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer, and clarified the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction over such tribunal decisions.
Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the arbitrator's mandate by two months under Section 29(A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondent.
SPML Infra Limited v. Power Grid Corporation of India Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the mandate of the arbitral tribunal by six months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
SPML Infra Limited v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court granted a three-month extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to counsel's unavailability and prior adjournments.
9560995495 v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the State and pharmaceutical companies to ensure timely access, transparent pricing, and proper distribution of medicines for minors suffering from Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, emphasizing the constitutional right to health.
Dimeco Formerly Known As Dimeco Alipresse v. Central Organisation for Modernization of Workshops Through Controller of Stores & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the arbitrator's mandate by six months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondents.
Bhadra International India Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Airports Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that there is no bar to granting a second extension of an arbitrator's mandate under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and extended the arbitrator's mandate by six months.
TATA PROJECTS LIMITED v. OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED
The Delhi High Court extended the arbitrator's mandate by three months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable the passing of the reserved award.
M/S JMC-CHEC JOINT VENTURE v. DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the learned Arbitrator by four months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
M/S AOM ADVERTISING PVT. LTD v. M/S DELHI TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court extended the arbitrator's mandate by six months under Sections 29A(4) and 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing continuation of arbitration proceedings with no objection from the respondent.